National Advertising Division Refers Comparative Advertising Claims made by Zscaler to Federal Trade Commission for Further Review
703.247.9330 / firstname.lastname@example.org
New York, NY – November 30, 2022 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs has referred advertising claims made by Zscaler, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after the company failed to respond substantively to a challenge into claims made for its Zero Trust Exchange Platform. NAD recommended that Zscaler discontinue claims about various privacy protection attributes and benefits of its Zero Trust Exchange platform versus the technical capabilities of Prisma Access, the platform of challenger Palo Alto Networks.
Although Zscaler contended that NAD did not have jurisdiction to consider this challenge, NAD determined that, pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures, it has jurisdiction over the advertising claims at issue in this case because:
- A non-disclosure agreement between the advertiser and an entity not party to these proceedings did not protect advertising claims contained within a marketing brochure from NAD’s review, although the advertiser argued the challenger tortiously interfered with a third-party confidentiality agreement. For policy reasons, it is important that advertisers not use a cloak of confidentiality to hide misleading advertising.
- The marketing brochure in which the challenged claims appear is a carefully prepared seventeen-page document with extensive design elements that suggest it was intended for broad dissemination. The advertiser acknowledged that it was provided to multiple recipients to promote the benefits of Zscaler’s security platform and, as a result, constitutes national advertising as defined in NAD/NARB Procedures.
NAD routinely considers challenges involving highly complicated technologies from many industries without issue and concluded that the issues in this case are not so technical that they are beyond NAD’s review.
Because Zscaler did not submit any argument or evidence to support its claims on the merits, the NAD/NARB Procedures allow NAD to conclude that Zscaler failed to meet its burden of providing a reasonable basis for its claims.
NAD/NARB Procedures further require advertisers to state in writing at the close of the case whether they intend to comply with NAD’s recommendations or appeal NAD’s findings. Zscaler declined to submit this written statement. Therefore, pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures, NAD referred this case to the FTC and other regulatory authorities for review and possible enforcement action.
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.
Mint Mobile Appeals National Advertising Division Recommendation to Discontinue or Modify Claim that its Unlimited Plan is “Now Just $15/Mo.”
New York, NY – October 4, 2023 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by AT&T, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Mint Mobile discontinue or modify the claim that its Unlimited Plan is “now just $15/mo.”
National Advertising Review Board Refers Smile Prep’s Clear Aligners Advertising to FTC After Compliance Review
New York, NY – September 27, 2023 – The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) has referred advertising claims made by Smile Prep to the FTC for review and possible enforcement action after the company declined to accept NARB recommendations to modify certain claims and disclosures on its website.
National Advertising Division Recommends MacuHealth Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Several Brands of Eye Health Dietary Supplements
New York, NY – September 21, 2023 – In a challenge brought by Vision Elements, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that MacuHealth modify or discontinue certain claims for its dietary supplement products.
National Advertising Division Refers Advertising by SBLA Beauty to the Federal Trade Commission for Review for Failure to Participate
New York, NY – September 21, 2023 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) has referred advertising claims made by SBLA Beauty, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after the company failed to provide a substantive response to NAD’s inquiry.