DSSRC Administrative Closure #108

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) commenced an inquiry with a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members.

The first Facebook post discussed how “confident” his family was during the pandemic because the Company product boosts the immune system. The second post features a picture of the company product alongside a list of serious health-related conditions that can purportedly be treated by the products (e.g., arthritis, diabetes, leukemia, stroke, pneumonia, etc.) Finally, a third social media post was almost identical to the second post in that it featured a picture of the product next to a list of forty-three health-related conditions that can be treated by the product. DSSRC notes that it is incumbent on an advertiser to support health-related claims with competent and reliable scientific evidence which have been defined by the Federal Trade Commission as "tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results." Moreover, according to the Center of Disease Controls and the Food and Drug Administration, there are currently no dietary supplement products available that can treat the coronavirus or its symptoms.

Within 48 hours after receiving DSSRC’s opening letter, the Company immediately contacted DSSRC and stated that the three posts were disseminated by salesforce members located overseas and included claims that were not authorized by the Company.  The Company then promptly contacted the compliance officer for the foreign countries where the posts originated and had them disabled. In addition, DSSRC alerted the Company of posts that were disseminated by Malaysian salesforce members that also communicated serious disease claims. The Company informed DSSRC that it contacted Company’s compliance officer in Malaysia regarding the inappropriateness of the posts and was in the process of having the posts removed.

Based upon the Company’s actions to promptly disable the posts that originated outside of the United States, DSSRC administratively closed its inquiry.

(closed on 11/24/2020)

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Bausch + Lomb Claims for INFUSE Contact Lenses Supported; Advertiser Appeals Other Findings

New York, NY – December 1, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that Bausch Health provided a reasonable basis for certain INFUSE silicone hydrogel (SiHy) daily contact lens and lens property claims. 

Read the Decision
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Byte Disclose Incentivized Reviews for Aligner Products

New York, NY – November 30, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that Straight Smile, LLC (Byte) take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures informing consumers that the review was incentivized for each incentivized review on its website and on BestCompany.com, and...

Read the Decision
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Daxen Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – November 24, 2021 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that certain product performance and earnings claims made by Daxen, Inc. and its salesforce be discontinued. Central to this inquiry was a concern that the challenged product performance claims communicated...

Read the Decision
Decision

T-Mobile Appeals National Advertising Division Recommendation to Discontinue “America’s . . . Most Reliable 5G Network” and Other Claims

New York, NY – November 23, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue certain advertising claims for T-Mobile’s 5G network. T-Mobile will appeal NAD’s decision. The claims, which appeared in television, radio, and internet advertising, were challenged by...

Read the Decision