NAD Refers Ceres Turf, Inc. Advertising Claims to FTC After Advertiser Declines to Participate

For Immediate Release 

New York, NY – June 17, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) has referred advertising claims made by Ceres Turf, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for further review after the company declined to participate in a proceeding before NAD. 

Claims made by Ceres Turf for its MiniQuad turf aeration tines, used for the maintenance of golf course greens,  were challenged by Trigon Turf Sciences, LLC, manufacturer of competing aeration tines. Claims at issue included: 

Express claims: 

  • “First, we have increased the length of the nose which improves the MiniQuad’s longevity as compared to the Ninja.” 

  • “Ninja tines were made of a low carbon alloy steel. So we’ve upgraded to a 4140 steel alloy, which is the best available.” 

  • “The last change is that we shaved off over five dollars from the cost of a Ninja so that each MiniQuad sells for $14.75.” 

 

Implied claim: 

  • Ceres Turf claimed improvements are relative to the current Ninja product for sale in the United States. 

 

Although the advertiser initially agreed to participate in NAD’s inquiry, following a series of emails between NAD and the parties, the advertiser stated that it would no longer participate in the NAD dispute resolution process. Ceres Turf stated that while it respects NAD and its self-regulatory proceedings, it did not believe NAD’s decision would resolve the dispute with Trigon Turf Sciences. 

NAD believes that this dispute could have been settled through its well-established dispute resolution process and is disappointed that the advertiser declined to participate in the self-regulatory forum. In light of the advertiser’s election not to participate in this NAD inquiry, pursuant to its procedures NAD has referred the matter to the FTC for possible enforcement action. 

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Fenty Skin Melt AWF Cleanser Performance Claims Supported; Recommends Modifications to Disclosures

New York, NY – April 12, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined, as part of its routine monitoring program, that Fenty Skin LLC provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Melt AWF Jelly Oil Makeup-Melting Cleanser.

Read the Decision Summary