NARB Recommends Choice Home Warranty Modify Certain Claims for its Home Warranty Service Plans, and Discontinue Others

For Immediate Release 

Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs 

301.412.7769 / ahills@bbbnp.org 

 

New York, NY – July 1, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) has recommended that Choice Home Warranty (CHW) modify or discontinue certain claims regarding its home warranty service plans. The advertising at issue had been challenged by competitor Frontdoor, Inc. before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Following NAD’s decision, CHW appealed most of the NAD findings adverse to it.  

As it relates to NAD’s original findings and recommendations, NARB agreed that: 

 

  • The challenged claim “never pay for covered home repairs again” conveys to consumers that if a specific system or appliance is one that is covered by a CHW service plan, the CHW subscriber will pay nothing further if that item needs repairs. NARB determined that the claim is misleading because there are many coverage limitations, and the claim “if we can’t fix it, we’ll replace it” is false in that CHW may give the plan subscriber a cash payment in lieu of a repair, however, the cash payment may be insufficient to allow a customer to replace the item. NARB recommended that CHW discontinue these claims.  

  • CHW’s claim that its least expensive warranty plan costs “about $1 a day” was unsupported because the actual cost was $1.36 a day, a one-third price differential that NARB concluded is a material difference. NARB agreed that the advertiser should not juxtapose any price claim for a specific service with references to benefits only available from a plan for which the charges are higher.   

  • CHW’s “you can save thousands” and similar claims are misleading, both when made by the advertiser directly and when cited in a testimonial, because there was no evidence that this amount of savings represented a typical amount. NARB recommended that the claim be discontinued or modified to clearly and conspicuously disclose the limitations on the amounts covered.  

  • CHW’s claims that its service has been rated by a third-party website must include a disclosure that CHW payed a fee to the rating service, as this is a material fact that should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed to consumers in connection with any reference in advertising to the rating or ranking.   

 

CHW stated that it respectfully disagreed with the result and NARB’s recommendations, but stated that it “is a strong supporter of NARB’s self-regulatory process and will comply with NARB’s decision.” 

 

### 

 

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters.  

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. This independent, non-profit organization enhances trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution, and accountability programs. BBB National Programs’ 10 leading industry self-regulation and dispute resolution programs resolve business issues of national and international importance, and fosters industry best practices in truth-in-advertising, child-directed marketing, data privacy, and dispute resolution. To learn more about industry self-regulation, visit bbbprograms.org.   

Latest Decisions

Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Determines that Visual Supply Company App Is Not “Directed Primarily or Secondarily to Children”

New York, NY – January 21, 2021 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) determined that Visual Supply Company (VSCO) is not an online service directed primarily or secondarily to children under age 13 as defined by the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and...
Read the Decision
Decision

DSSRC Refers Health-Related Product and Earnings Claims for Gano Excel to FTC

McLean, VA – January 13, 2021 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred certain product performance and income claims made by Gano Excel USA to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for possible enforcement action after Gano Excel failed to provide substantiation for the claims. 

Read Decision
Decision

NARB Refers Health-Related Claims for Theraworx Relief for Muscle and Joint Products to the FTC

New York, NY – January 12, 2021 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) has referred advertising claims made by Avadim Health, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for review and possible enforcement action. The referral comes after the company declined to comply with a NARB recommendation to discontinue...

Read Decision
Decision

NAD Recommends Zarbee’s Inc. Qualify Use of the Term “Natural” in its Brand-Name for Some of its Dietary Supplement Products, and Modify Additional Claims

New York, NY – January 7, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Zarbee’s qualify its use of the term “natural” in the Zarbee’s Naturals brand name when some or all the essential or key ingredients used in its products are...

Read Decision