NAD Finds SmileDirectClub “60% Less Than Braces” Claim Supported with Modifications; Recommends “60% Less Than Other Brands” Claim be Discontinued

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – March 16, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that SmileDirectClub, LLC provided a reasonable basis for the claim that their treatment system costs “60% less than braces,” but recommended SmileDirectClub modify the claim to ensure that consumers are provided with all material information relevant to its price comparison, and NAD also recommended that SmileDirectClub discontinue the claim “60% less than other brands."

The claims at issue, which appeared in online advertising, were challenged by Align Technology, Inc., maker of Invisalign clear aligners. 

In a 2020 challenge brought by Align, NAD had recommended that SmileDirectClub’s “60% less than braces” and “60% less than other brands” claims both be discontinued. Based on NAD’s recommendation, the advertiser agreed to discontinue these claims.

Recently, SmileDirectClub petitioned to reopen the matter pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures. NAD granted the petition to re-open based on a new survey of 200 practicing orthodontists conducted by a third-party market research company to address the concerns NAD had expressed in the prior decision. 

It was undisputed that the challenged claims expressly convey that a consumer undergoing treatment through the SmileDirectClub system will pay 60% less than he or she would for a traditional in-office treatment using either braces or other brands of clear aligners, including Invisalign. NAD’s analysis focused on the fit and suitability of the advertiser’s survey to those messages conveyed.

NAD determined that Smile Direct Club’s survey constituted reliable evidence. However, NAD explained that without additional information, a consumer could nevertheless take away an overly broad and potentially misleading message from the advertiser’s “60% less than braces” claim. Therefore, NAD recommended that the advertising should be modified to:

  • Alert consumers that SmileDirectClub aligners cannot and will not correct the same range of issues that might be addressed with braces.
  • Clearly disclose the basis of the price comparison, including that the average typical price was derived from a survey of orthodontists asking the price for treatment of mild-to-moderate malocclusion with braces as well as the additional services included in the average typical price (i.e., costs associated with diagnostics and exams).
  • Make clear that the SmileDirectClub price being compared is its one-time single payment price, not the higher SmilePay monthly payment price, and does not include the cost of any additional services, such as retainers.

 

Further, NAD determined that SmileDirectClub did not provide a reasonable basis for the “60% less than other brands” claim and recommended that it be discontinued. NAD noted that this general superiority claim against the market of clear aligners must be substantiated against a significant portion of the market, usually against the top 85% of the market based on unit sales. While the advertiser’s survey asked respondents about the typical price they charge for clear aligners, it did not ask which brand of aligners they prescribe. Because of this, NAD determined it is not clear how much of the market is represented in the responses. 

In its advertiser statement, SmileDirectClub stated that “it will comply with the NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that it “is happy to supplement its ‘60% less than braces’ claims with additional clarifying information.” 

All BBB National Programs case decisions can be found in the case decision library

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary