National Advertising Division Recommends Byte Disclose Incentivized Reviews for Aligner Products

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 /

New York, NY – November 30, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that Straight Smile, LLC (Byte):

  • Take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures informing consumers that the review was incentivized for each incentivized review on its website and on; and  
  • Discontinue its advertising ranking on or modify the advertising to ensure that consumers clearly understand that Best Company’s ranking is advertising for Byte and not an honest review from an independent third party.


The claims were challenged by SmileDirectClub, LLC. 

During the proceeding, the advertiser voluntarily discontinued or modified certain challenged claims, including claims that Byte is “#1” rated, comparative and monadic claims regarding Byte’s treatment time, claims regarding nighttime aligners, cost savings and discounts claims, claims about SmileDirectClub, and implied claims. The advertiser further agreed to modify the disclosure on its reviews page to make clear that the disclosure also applies to its video reviews and discontinued a video advertisement being shown on NAD did not review these claims on the merits. 


Consumer Reviews on Byte’s Website

NAD considered whether Byte properly disclosed incentivized reviews on its website, which contains both video and textual reviews from consumers and includes the small disclosure stating “We’ve asked our reviewers to share the good, the bad, and the ugly with us. These reviews may include ones where known purchasers were given free product in exchange for their honest opinions.” NAD determined that a blanket disclosure is not effective in putting consumers on notice that a review has been incentivized. NAD noted that a single, blanket disclosure tells consumers only that there may be some reviews that were incentivized and gives the consumer no way to ascertain the credibility of each review. 

Therefore, NAD concluded that Byte’s disclosure was not sufficient and recommended that the advertiser take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures for each incentivized review on its website.


Consumer Reviews on

NAD also considered whether consumer reviews posted for Byte’s products on third-party website included disclosures about incentivization. Byte pays Best Company to solicit reviews and has a relationship with Best Company to promote its products. Through this relationship, Byte has ultimate responsibility for advertising claims run by Best Company on its behalf. 

NAD found that incentivized reviews that appear on were solicited as part of Best Company’s relationship with Byte and thus are part of the advertising relationship between Byte and Best Company. Accordingly, NAD recommended that the advertiser take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures for each incentivized review and add a clear and conspicuous disclosure to its product page on citing its user reviews. Ranking Claims

Among the invisible braces brands listed on (which includes SmileDirectClub as well as various other competitors of Byte), ranks Byte the best in several areas. Although there is a disclosure link titled “Income Disclosure” at the top of each webpage, NAD determined that the relationship between Byte and is not clearly disclosed through that link because:

  • In order to see the disclosure, consumers must click on a link titled “Income Disclosure” at the top of the page;
  • The title “Income Disclosure” may not alert consumers that if they click on the link, they will learn about the relationship between and the companies it is ranking and recommending; and
  • Even if consumers click on the link, the disclosure does not identify Byte but merely states that some companies may provide compensation. In addition, NAD noted that the general disclosure that some content is incentivized is not sufficient because consumers viewing Byte’s profile will not realize that this company has paid Best Company.


NAD further noted that Best Company rankings for the “Invisible Braces” category are influenced by the material connection between Best Company and the company ranked. For these reasons, NAD recommended that Byte discontinue its advertising ranking on or modify the advertising to ensure that consumers clearly understand that Best Company’s ranking is advertising for Byte and not an honest review from an independent third party.

In its advertiser statement, Byte stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that while it disagrees with NAD’s views that “Byte’s relationship with Best Company was not properly disclosed” and that Best Company’s ranking of Byte “constitutes an advertising claim run on behalf of Byte,” it “respects the self-regulatory process and thanks NAD for its consideration of this matter.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.


About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

Latest News


Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Le-Vel Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Performance Claims in Compliance Inquiry

McLean, VA – January 19, 2022 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) opened a compliance inquiry to review advertising from Le-Vel Brands, LLC that had been the subject of an inquiry from 2020. DSSRC recommended that the new product performance and earnings claims identified in...
Read the Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Glad Trash Bags Product Packaging Not Misleading; Recommends Glad Discontinue or Modify Other Advertising Claims

New York, NY – January 19, 2022 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that product packaging for Glad Products Company’s ForceFlex Plus with Clorox Tall Kitchen Drawstring Bags appropriately ties the Clorox brand to its odor elimination role, and that product packaging for...

Read the Decision

Case #58-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – Surge365

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more

Case #57-2021 – Compliance Report – Le-Vel Brands, LLC

Le-Vel Brands, LLC (“Le-Vel” or the “Company) is a multi-level direct selling company headquartered in Frisco, Texas that was founded in 2012. The Company sells health and wellness products including dietary supplements containing vitamins, minerals, plant extracts, antioxidants, enzymes, probiotics, and amino acids.

Read more