Following NAD Challenge, Factor Nutrition Permanently Discontinues Claim that Focus Factor is “America’s #1 Brain Health Supplement”

 

For Immediate Release 

Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs, 301.412.7769 / ahills@bbbnp.org 

 

NAD Finds No Reasonable Basis for Proposed Modified Claim, “America’s #1 Clinically Studied and Patented Brain Health Formula" 

 

New York, NY – May 6, 2020 – The BBB National Programs National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Factor Nutrition, LLC discontinue the claim that its Focus Factor brain health supplement is “America’s #1 Clinically Studied and Patented Brain Health Formula,” following a challenge by Quincy BioScience, Inc., maker of Prevagen brain health dietary supplement. 

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is a division of the BBB National Programs’ self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs. 

During the course of the proceeding, Factor Nutrition agreed to permanently discontinue the challenged claim “America’s #1 Brain Health Supplement,” which appeared on product packaging, labeling and in internet advertising. NAD, relying on the advertiser’s representation that the claim has been permanently discontinued, did not review the claim on its merits. The voluntarily discontinued claim will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended its discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply. 

The advertiser proposed a modification of its claim to read: “America’s #1 Clinically Studied and Patented Brain Health Formula,” and NAD assessed whether the evidence in the record was sufficient to substantiate the claim. 

First, NAD determined that the evidence in the record was insufficient to support the health-related product efficacy claim that Focus Factor is “America’s #1 Clinically Studied . . . Brain Health Supplement.” The evidence in the record demonstrated that other brain health supplements (including Prevagen) outsell Focus Factor, however, there was limited evidence in the record regarding which of those products had been clinically studied or the reliability of those studies. NAD noted that in order to support its claim the advertiser would have needed to show that, for any products that outsell Focus Factor, testing on those products is lacking or is insufficiently reliable to demonstrate any brain health benefits.  

Further, with regard to the latter portion of the claim, that Focus Factor is “America’s #1 . . . Patented Brain Health Formula,” the advertiser argued that the claim is supported because Focus Factor has a patent on the product’s formula covering “brain health and mental performance,” whereas the challenger does not hold a patent on Prevagen’s finished product but, rather, only on certain ingredients in its product. While the advertiser’s Focus Factor supplement has a 2012 patent, NAD noted that the product’s Supplement Facts lists ingredients not mentioned in the patent’s list of ingredients – Vitamins A, C and D, and Riboflavin – calling into question whether its patent covers the entire finished formula. NAD also determined that even if it is literally true that Focus Factor is the #1 selling product that has (1) a patent on its finished formula and (2) a patent specifically for brain health, consumers would be unlikely to make the nuanced distinction between the advertiser’s product and the challenger’s (and other) brain health supplements with patented key ingredients. Rather, consumers would likely still take away the overarching – but unsupported message – that Focus Factor is America’s #1 selling brain health supplement that is also patented. 

For these reasons, NAD determined that the advertiser did not provide a reasonable basis for its proposed modified claim that Focus Factor is “America’s #1 Clinically Studied and Patented Brain Health Formula,” and recommended that the claim be discontinued.  

In its advertiser’s statement, Factor Nutrition was disappointed with certain of NAD’s findings, but agreed to comply with NAD’s recommendations.   

### 

About the National Advertising Division: National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation overseeing the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for truth and accuracy.  

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. BBB National Programs is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org

 

Latest News

Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #63

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #62

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #61

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that two of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #60

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the...
Read more