BBB National Programs Newsroom

NARB Recommends Benefiber Discontinue “100% Natural” and “Clinically Proven” Claims, But Finds “Helps You Feel Fuller Longer” Claim Supported

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – October 22, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), a division of BBB National Programs, recommended that GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, LLC (GSK) discontinue “100% natural” and “clinically proven to curb cravings” claims for Benefiber Original and Benefiber Healthy Shape (Benefiber). However, the panel determined that GSK provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Benefiber “helps you feel fuller longer.” 

The advertising at issue had been challenged by The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6366), GSK appealed NAD’s findings regarding these claims.

The sole ingredient in Benefiber is wheat dextrin. The panel concluded that, if the process by which wheat dextrin is manufactured were explained to consumers, they would likely not view the product as “100% natural.” Therefore, the panel determined that GSK’s “100% natural” claim is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued. The panel noted, however, that its conclusion regarding the “100% natural” claim “should not be interpreted as prejudging a more limited or qualified use of ‘natural’ that might be supported by the evidence.”

With regard to GSK’s satiety claim that Benefiber is “clinically proven to curb cravings,” the NARB panel noted that a “clinically proven” claim for a product offered to provide health benefits is a strong claim that should be supported by robust evidence from clinical studies. The panel concluded that GSK’s “clinically proven” claim is unsupported and should be withdrawn because each of the seven clinical studies relied on by GSK were subject to valid criticism as to whether they constituted a “good fit” for the claim.

However, the panel determined that GSK’s second satiety claim, “help you feel fuller longer,” is supported. The panel noted that the claim is qualified by use of the word “helps,” and concluded that the results of the seven clinical studies relied on by the advertiser, taken as a whole, are supportive of this more limited claim.

GSK stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision. GSK further stated that while it “respectfully disagrees with NARB’s determination that the ‘100% Natural’ claim is not substantiated . . . GSK appreciates the NARB’s recognition that GSK can make a more limited or qualified ‘natural’ claim that is supported by the evidence.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

NARB Recommends Benefiber Discontinue “100% Natural” and “Clinically Proven” Claims, But Finds “Helps You Feel Fuller Longer” Claim Supported

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – October 22, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), a division of BBB National Programs, recommended that GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, LLC (GSK) discontinue “100% natural” and “clinically proven to curb cravings” claims for Benefiber Original and Benefiber Healthy Shape (Benefiber). However, the panel determined that GSK provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Benefiber “helps you feel fuller longer.” 

The advertising at issue had been challenged by The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6366), GSK appealed NAD’s findings regarding these claims.

The sole ingredient in Benefiber is wheat dextrin. The panel concluded that, if the process by which wheat dextrin is manufactured were explained to consumers, they would likely not view the product as “100% natural.” Therefore, the panel determined that GSK’s “100% natural” claim is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued. The panel noted, however, that its conclusion regarding the “100% natural” claim “should not be interpreted as prejudging a more limited or qualified use of ‘natural’ that might be supported by the evidence.”

With regard to GSK’s satiety claim that Benefiber is “clinically proven to curb cravings,” the NARB panel noted that a “clinically proven” claim for a product offered to provide health benefits is a strong claim that should be supported by robust evidence from clinical studies. The panel concluded that GSK’s “clinically proven” claim is unsupported and should be withdrawn because each of the seven clinical studies relied on by GSK were subject to valid criticism as to whether they constituted a “good fit” for the claim.

However, the panel determined that GSK’s second satiety claim, “help you feel fuller longer,” is supported. The panel noted that the claim is qualified by use of the word “helps,” and concluded that the results of the seven clinical studies relied on by the advertiser, taken as a whole, are supportive of this more limited claim.

GSK stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision. GSK further stated that while it “respectfully disagrees with NARB’s determination that the ‘100% Natural’ claim is not substantiated . . . GSK appreciates the NARB’s recognition that GSK can make a more limited or qualified ‘natural’ claim that is supported by the evidence.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

Blog

Unpacking Misleading Advertising Claims in the Children’s Space

Advertisements may seem simple on the surface, but certain aspects of the ad business, including advertising law, are complex. The role of monitoring ads directed to children is especially complex. It seems straightforward: advertisers are not allowed to lie in their advertisements, but an advertiser is also responsible for all reasonable interpretations of the claims it makes and not just the messages it intended to convey. This blog outlines how to make sure your advertising passes the truthfulness test.
Read more
Blog

A Beginner's Guide to Reading Privacy Policies

Privacy policies are complicated and can be frustrating to read, especially when you are trying to learn about your child's data privacy online. The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) reviews child-directed online environments to ensure that children’s data is collected and handled responsibly. As a parent, follow these steps to take a proactive role in your child’s data privacy, using privacy policies as your guide to better understand an online service’s data collection practices.
Read more
Blog

Q&A: What is an SRO? A Beginner’s Guide to International Advertising Self-Regulation

Advertising is a cutting-edge industry, so it is no surprise that the ad business has been at the forefront of a global trend building for almost 60 years – independent industry self-regulation. In the U.S., the National Advertising Division is the industry’s widely recognized “truth-in-advertising” body, an independent third party that enables competitors to resolve disputes outside the courtroom. It is the self-regulatory organization (SRO) of the U.S. In this Q&A with Mary Engle, Executive Vice President, Policy, here at BBB National Programs, we dig into what industry self-regulation looks like in other parts of the world.
Read more
Blog

Substantiating Advertising Claims in Three Steps: A How-To Checklist for Advertisers

Substantiating advertising claims is important, both to comply with the law and to avoid regulatory scrutiny or a potential challenge from a competitor in court or in a proceeding before the National Advertising Division (NAD). NAD examines the fit between challenged claims and the substantiation provided. What follows is not legal advice but a basic one-two-three checklist for advertisers concerned about substantiating their advertising claims.
Read more

NARB Recommends Benefiber Discontinue “100% Natural” and “Clinically Proven” Claims, But Finds “Helps You Feel Fuller Longer” Claim Supported

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – October 22, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), a division of BBB National Programs, recommended that GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, LLC (GSK) discontinue “100% natural” and “clinically proven to curb cravings” claims for Benefiber Original and Benefiber Healthy Shape (Benefiber). However, the panel determined that GSK provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Benefiber “helps you feel fuller longer.” 

The advertising at issue had been challenged by The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6366), GSK appealed NAD’s findings regarding these claims.

The sole ingredient in Benefiber is wheat dextrin. The panel concluded that, if the process by which wheat dextrin is manufactured were explained to consumers, they would likely not view the product as “100% natural.” Therefore, the panel determined that GSK’s “100% natural” claim is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued. The panel noted, however, that its conclusion regarding the “100% natural” claim “should not be interpreted as prejudging a more limited or qualified use of ‘natural’ that might be supported by the evidence.”

With regard to GSK’s satiety claim that Benefiber is “clinically proven to curb cravings,” the NARB panel noted that a “clinically proven” claim for a product offered to provide health benefits is a strong claim that should be supported by robust evidence from clinical studies. The panel concluded that GSK’s “clinically proven” claim is unsupported and should be withdrawn because each of the seven clinical studies relied on by GSK were subject to valid criticism as to whether they constituted a “good fit” for the claim.

However, the panel determined that GSK’s second satiety claim, “help you feel fuller longer,” is supported. The panel noted that the claim is qualified by use of the word “helps,” and concluded that the results of the seven clinical studies relied on by the advertiser, taken as a whole, are supportive of this more limited claim.

GSK stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision. GSK further stated that while it “respectfully disagrees with NARB’s determination that the ‘100% Natural’ claim is not substantiated . . . GSK appreciates the NARB’s recognition that GSK can make a more limited or qualified ‘natural’ claim that is supported by the evidence.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

Media Inquiry