BBB National Programs Newsroom

NAD Finds SmileDirectClub “60% Less Than Braces” Claim Supported with Modifications; Recommends “60% Less Than Other Brands” Claim be Discontinued

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – March 16, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that SmileDirectClub, LLC provided a reasonable basis for the claim that their treatment system costs “60% less than braces,” but recommended SmileDirectClub modify the claim to ensure that consumers are provided with all material information relevant to its price comparison, and NAD also recommended that SmileDirectClub discontinue the claim “60% less than other brands."

The claims at issue, which appeared in online advertising, were challenged by Align Technology, Inc., maker of Invisalign clear aligners. 

In a 2020 challenge brought by Align, NAD had recommended that SmileDirectClub’s “60% less than braces” and “60% less than other brands” claims both be discontinued. Based on NAD’s recommendation, the advertiser agreed to discontinue these claims.

Recently, SmileDirectClub petitioned to reopen the matter pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures. NAD granted the petition to re-open based on a new survey of 200 practicing orthodontists conducted by a third-party market research company to address the concerns NAD had expressed in the prior decision. 

It was undisputed that the challenged claims expressly convey that a consumer undergoing treatment through the SmileDirectClub system will pay 60% less than he or she would for a traditional in-office treatment using either braces or other brands of clear aligners, including Invisalign. NAD’s analysis focused on the fit and suitability of the advertiser’s survey to those messages conveyed.

NAD determined that Smile Direct Club’s survey constituted reliable evidence. However, NAD explained that without additional information, a consumer could nevertheless take away an overly broad and potentially misleading message from the advertiser’s “60% less than braces” claim. Therefore, NAD recommended that the advertising should be modified to:

  • Alert consumers that SmileDirectClub aligners cannot and will not correct the same range of issues that might be addressed with braces.
  • Clearly disclose the basis of the price comparison, including that the average typical price was derived from a survey of orthodontists asking the price for treatment of mild-to-moderate malocclusion with braces as well as the additional services included in the average typical price (i.e., costs associated with diagnostics and exams).
  • Make clear that the SmileDirectClub price being compared is its one-time single payment price, not the higher SmilePay monthly payment price, and does not include the cost of any additional services, such as retainers.

 

Further, NAD determined that SmileDirectClub did not provide a reasonable basis for the “60% less than other brands” claim and recommended that it be discontinued. NAD noted that this general superiority claim against the market of clear aligners must be substantiated against a significant portion of the market, usually against the top 85% of the market based on unit sales. While the advertiser’s survey asked respondents about the typical price they charge for clear aligners, it did not ask which brand of aligners they prescribe. Because of this, NAD determined it is not clear how much of the market is represented in the responses. 

In its advertiser statement, SmileDirectClub stated that “it will comply with the NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that it “is happy to supplement its ‘60% less than braces’ claims with additional clarifying information.” 

All BBB National Programs case decisions can be found in the case decision library

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

NAD Finds SmileDirectClub “60% Less Than Braces” Claim Supported with Modifications; Recommends “60% Less Than Other Brands” Claim be Discontinued

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – March 16, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that SmileDirectClub, LLC provided a reasonable basis for the claim that their treatment system costs “60% less than braces,” but recommended SmileDirectClub modify the claim to ensure that consumers are provided with all material information relevant to its price comparison, and NAD also recommended that SmileDirectClub discontinue the claim “60% less than other brands."

The claims at issue, which appeared in online advertising, were challenged by Align Technology, Inc., maker of Invisalign clear aligners. 

In a 2020 challenge brought by Align, NAD had recommended that SmileDirectClub’s “60% less than braces” and “60% less than other brands” claims both be discontinued. Based on NAD’s recommendation, the advertiser agreed to discontinue these claims.

Recently, SmileDirectClub petitioned to reopen the matter pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures. NAD granted the petition to re-open based on a new survey of 200 practicing orthodontists conducted by a third-party market research company to address the concerns NAD had expressed in the prior decision. 

It was undisputed that the challenged claims expressly convey that a consumer undergoing treatment through the SmileDirectClub system will pay 60% less than he or she would for a traditional in-office treatment using either braces or other brands of clear aligners, including Invisalign. NAD’s analysis focused on the fit and suitability of the advertiser’s survey to those messages conveyed.

NAD determined that Smile Direct Club’s survey constituted reliable evidence. However, NAD explained that without additional information, a consumer could nevertheless take away an overly broad and potentially misleading message from the advertiser’s “60% less than braces” claim. Therefore, NAD recommended that the advertising should be modified to:

  • Alert consumers that SmileDirectClub aligners cannot and will not correct the same range of issues that might be addressed with braces.
  • Clearly disclose the basis of the price comparison, including that the average typical price was derived from a survey of orthodontists asking the price for treatment of mild-to-moderate malocclusion with braces as well as the additional services included in the average typical price (i.e., costs associated with diagnostics and exams).
  • Make clear that the SmileDirectClub price being compared is its one-time single payment price, not the higher SmilePay monthly payment price, and does not include the cost of any additional services, such as retainers.

 

Further, NAD determined that SmileDirectClub did not provide a reasonable basis for the “60% less than other brands” claim and recommended that it be discontinued. NAD noted that this general superiority claim against the market of clear aligners must be substantiated against a significant portion of the market, usually against the top 85% of the market based on unit sales. While the advertiser’s survey asked respondents about the typical price they charge for clear aligners, it did not ask which brand of aligners they prescribe. Because of this, NAD determined it is not clear how much of the market is represented in the responses. 

In its advertiser statement, SmileDirectClub stated that “it will comply with the NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that it “is happy to supplement its ‘60% less than braces’ claims with additional clarifying information.” 

All BBB National Programs case decisions can be found in the case decision library

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

Blog

Enhancing Brand Safety: Understanding Self-Regulation vs. Independent Industry Self-Regulation

With copious amounts of content proliferating across a growing number of platforms and websites, it is an ongoing challenge for advertisers and platforms to ensure that digital ads are not placed next to harmful content. In this conversation, there is a key distinction few are making — the difference between ‘self-regulation’ and ‘independent, industry-wide self-regulation.’
Read more
Blog

CFBAI and CCAI Published the 2020 Annual Report on Participant Compliance and Program Progress

BBB National Programs has released the CFBAI and CCAI 2020 Annual Report, which includes findings on CFBAI and CCAI participant compliance with their commitment to advertise only foods that meet CFBAI’s strict Uniform Nutrition Criteria or to not engage in advertising primarily directed to children under age 12. The Report indicates excellent compliance by the 19 CFBAI participants and the eight CCAI participants in 2020.
Read more
Blog

What Do You Need to Know about the Florida Lemon Law?

If you have ever purchased or leased a car or SUV that you consider a lemon, you may have questions about the myriad of federal and state laws that govern your vehicle and the remedies available to you. Each state also has their own statute governing vehicles sold and leased in that state for personal use. Today, we look at the lemon law in Florida, one of the fastest-growing states in the U.S.
Read more
Blog

AI Can Be A Force For Good In Recruiting And Hiring New Employees

A challenge for rapid innovation in any industry is the ability for legal and regulatory requirements to keep pace. In the recruiting and hiring process, where AI provides aid to human decision-making and a welcome relief to managing a deluge of data, company leaders are asking themselves: How can we combine important technological innovation with a proactive approach to employment law requirements?
Read more

NAD Finds SmileDirectClub “60% Less Than Braces” Claim Supported with Modifications; Recommends “60% Less Than Other Brands” Claim be Discontinued

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – March 16, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that SmileDirectClub, LLC provided a reasonable basis for the claim that their treatment system costs “60% less than braces,” but recommended SmileDirectClub modify the claim to ensure that consumers are provided with all material information relevant to its price comparison, and NAD also recommended that SmileDirectClub discontinue the claim “60% less than other brands."

The claims at issue, which appeared in online advertising, were challenged by Align Technology, Inc., maker of Invisalign clear aligners. 

In a 2020 challenge brought by Align, NAD had recommended that SmileDirectClub’s “60% less than braces” and “60% less than other brands” claims both be discontinued. Based on NAD’s recommendation, the advertiser agreed to discontinue these claims.

Recently, SmileDirectClub petitioned to reopen the matter pursuant to NAD/NARB Procedures. NAD granted the petition to re-open based on a new survey of 200 practicing orthodontists conducted by a third-party market research company to address the concerns NAD had expressed in the prior decision. 

It was undisputed that the challenged claims expressly convey that a consumer undergoing treatment through the SmileDirectClub system will pay 60% less than he or she would for a traditional in-office treatment using either braces or other brands of clear aligners, including Invisalign. NAD’s analysis focused on the fit and suitability of the advertiser’s survey to those messages conveyed.

NAD determined that Smile Direct Club’s survey constituted reliable evidence. However, NAD explained that without additional information, a consumer could nevertheless take away an overly broad and potentially misleading message from the advertiser’s “60% less than braces” claim. Therefore, NAD recommended that the advertising should be modified to:

  • Alert consumers that SmileDirectClub aligners cannot and will not correct the same range of issues that might be addressed with braces.
  • Clearly disclose the basis of the price comparison, including that the average typical price was derived from a survey of orthodontists asking the price for treatment of mild-to-moderate malocclusion with braces as well as the additional services included in the average typical price (i.e., costs associated with diagnostics and exams).
  • Make clear that the SmileDirectClub price being compared is its one-time single payment price, not the higher SmilePay monthly payment price, and does not include the cost of any additional services, such as retainers.

 

Further, NAD determined that SmileDirectClub did not provide a reasonable basis for the “60% less than other brands” claim and recommended that it be discontinued. NAD noted that this general superiority claim against the market of clear aligners must be substantiated against a significant portion of the market, usually against the top 85% of the market based on unit sales. While the advertiser’s survey asked respondents about the typical price they charge for clear aligners, it did not ask which brand of aligners they prescribe. Because of this, NAD determined it is not clear how much of the market is represented in the responses. 

In its advertiser statement, SmileDirectClub stated that “it will comply with the NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that it “is happy to supplement its ‘60% less than braces’ claims with additional clarifying information.” 

All BBB National Programs case decisions can be found in the case decision library

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

 

 

Media Inquiry