BBB National Programs Newsroom

NAD Recommends T-Mobile Modify Post-Merger 5G Claims to Avoid Implication that Aspirational Benefits are Imminently Available

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – February 23, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that T-Mobile, U.S., Inc. modify certain advertising claims that imply imminent availability of certain promoted benefits to T-Mobile customers as a result of the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint. The T-Mobile claims at issue included “the best 5G network,” the “most reliable 5G network,” and the “best prices” for 5G service and appeared in television and radio advertising that was discontinued in July 2020. These claims were challenged by AT&T Services, Inc.

NAD determined that the challenged advertisements did not reasonably convey that the aspirational future benefits that will result from the T-Mobile-Sprint merger are presently available to consumers. NAD noted that while T-Mobile made certain commitments to the government as part of the merger approval process and is in the process of expanding and improving its 5G service, the complete integration of the T-Mobile and Sprint networks is not expected to occur for between three to six years.

NAD considered whether T-Mobile had a reasonable basis to support the implied claims that due to the merger T-Mobile is imminently poised to become, comparatively speaking, the “Best Network,” or will soon provide “the most reliable 5G network,” and concluded that T-Mobile did not present reliable evidence during the course of the proceeding on broad comparative metrics such as network speed and reliability that would fit its claim of imminent overall superiority.

Further, NAD determined that consumers could reasonably interpret T-Mobile’s “best price” claim to mean that T-Mobile will guarantee that its prices will be lower than its competition in both the near and remote future. NAD noted that this superior pricing claim is contingent on the pricing offered by T-Mobile’s competitors for 5G service, which is subject to change. T-Mobile did not provide evidence that its commitment to maintaining its current low pricing ensured that the vast majority of customers would always pay less with T-Mobile than with their competitors, both in the near and more distant future.

Therefore, without the requisite support for such claims, NAD recommended that the challenged advertising be modified to avoid conveying such messages. 

NAD noted, however, that nothing in its decision precludes the advertiser from formulating a more remote aspirational message as to its hopes and ambitions with regard to the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint, or from making truthful and non-misleading claims about its current pricing and commitment to maintaining low prices. 

In its advertiser statement, T-Mobile stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision . . . given that the ads in question stopped airing in July 2020” although it noted that it “strongly disagrees” with NAD’s view of its “aspirational goals not only as claims requiring substantiation, but as guarantees.” T-Mobile also stated its belief that the evidence it provided regarding pricing should have been sufficient support for its claims.

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.    

NAD Recommends T-Mobile Modify Post-Merger 5G Claims to Avoid Implication that Aspirational Benefits are Imminently Available

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – February 23, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that T-Mobile, U.S., Inc. modify certain advertising claims that imply imminent availability of certain promoted benefits to T-Mobile customers as a result of the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint. The T-Mobile claims at issue included “the best 5G network,” the “most reliable 5G network,” and the “best prices” for 5G service and appeared in television and radio advertising that was discontinued in July 2020. These claims were challenged by AT&T Services, Inc.

NAD determined that the challenged advertisements did not reasonably convey that the aspirational future benefits that will result from the T-Mobile-Sprint merger are presently available to consumers. NAD noted that while T-Mobile made certain commitments to the government as part of the merger approval process and is in the process of expanding and improving its 5G service, the complete integration of the T-Mobile and Sprint networks is not expected to occur for between three to six years.

NAD considered whether T-Mobile had a reasonable basis to support the implied claims that due to the merger T-Mobile is imminently poised to become, comparatively speaking, the “Best Network,” or will soon provide “the most reliable 5G network,” and concluded that T-Mobile did not present reliable evidence during the course of the proceeding on broad comparative metrics such as network speed and reliability that would fit its claim of imminent overall superiority.

Further, NAD determined that consumers could reasonably interpret T-Mobile’s “best price” claim to mean that T-Mobile will guarantee that its prices will be lower than its competition in both the near and remote future. NAD noted that this superior pricing claim is contingent on the pricing offered by T-Mobile’s competitors for 5G service, which is subject to change. T-Mobile did not provide evidence that its commitment to maintaining its current low pricing ensured that the vast majority of customers would always pay less with T-Mobile than with their competitors, both in the near and more distant future.

Therefore, without the requisite support for such claims, NAD recommended that the challenged advertising be modified to avoid conveying such messages. 

NAD noted, however, that nothing in its decision precludes the advertiser from formulating a more remote aspirational message as to its hopes and ambitions with regard to the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint, or from making truthful and non-misleading claims about its current pricing and commitment to maintaining low prices. 

In its advertiser statement, T-Mobile stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision . . . given that the ads in question stopped airing in July 2020” although it noted that it “strongly disagrees” with NAD’s view of its “aspirational goals not only as claims requiring substantiation, but as guarantees.” T-Mobile also stated its belief that the evidence it provided regarding pricing should have been sufficient support for its claims.

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.    

Blog

Enhancing Brand Safety: Understanding Self-Regulation vs. Independent Industry Self-Regulation

With copious amounts of content proliferating across a growing number of platforms and websites, it is an ongoing challenge for advertisers and platforms to ensure that digital ads are not placed next to harmful content. In this conversation, there is a key distinction few are making — the difference between ‘self-regulation’ and ‘independent, industry-wide self-regulation.’
Read more
Blog

CFBAI and CCAI Published the 2020 Annual Report on Participant Compliance and Program Progress

BBB National Programs has released the CFBAI and CCAI 2020 Annual Report, which includes findings on CFBAI and CCAI participant compliance with their commitment to advertise only foods that meet CFBAI’s strict Uniform Nutrition Criteria or to not engage in advertising primarily directed to children under age 12. The Report indicates excellent compliance by the 19 CFBAI participants and the eight CCAI participants in 2020.
Read more
Blog

What Do You Need to Know about the Florida Lemon Law?

If you have ever purchased or leased a car or SUV that you consider a lemon, you may have questions about the myriad of federal and state laws that govern your vehicle and the remedies available to you. Each state also has their own statute governing vehicles sold and leased in that state for personal use. Today, we look at the lemon law in Florida, one of the fastest-growing states in the U.S.
Read more
Blog

AI Can Be A Force For Good In Recruiting And Hiring New Employees

A challenge for rapid innovation in any industry is the ability for legal and regulatory requirements to keep pace. In the recruiting and hiring process, where AI provides aid to human decision-making and a welcome relief to managing a deluge of data, company leaders are asking themselves: How can we combine important technological innovation with a proactive approach to employment law requirements?
Read more

NAD Recommends T-Mobile Modify Post-Merger 5G Claims to Avoid Implication that Aspirational Benefits are Imminently Available

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – February 23, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that T-Mobile, U.S., Inc. modify certain advertising claims that imply imminent availability of certain promoted benefits to T-Mobile customers as a result of the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint. The T-Mobile claims at issue included “the best 5G network,” the “most reliable 5G network,” and the “best prices” for 5G service and appeared in television and radio advertising that was discontinued in July 2020. These claims were challenged by AT&T Services, Inc.

NAD determined that the challenged advertisements did not reasonably convey that the aspirational future benefits that will result from the T-Mobile-Sprint merger are presently available to consumers. NAD noted that while T-Mobile made certain commitments to the government as part of the merger approval process and is in the process of expanding and improving its 5G service, the complete integration of the T-Mobile and Sprint networks is not expected to occur for between three to six years.

NAD considered whether T-Mobile had a reasonable basis to support the implied claims that due to the merger T-Mobile is imminently poised to become, comparatively speaking, the “Best Network,” or will soon provide “the most reliable 5G network,” and concluded that T-Mobile did not present reliable evidence during the course of the proceeding on broad comparative metrics such as network speed and reliability that would fit its claim of imminent overall superiority.

Further, NAD determined that consumers could reasonably interpret T-Mobile’s “best price” claim to mean that T-Mobile will guarantee that its prices will be lower than its competition in both the near and remote future. NAD noted that this superior pricing claim is contingent on the pricing offered by T-Mobile’s competitors for 5G service, which is subject to change. T-Mobile did not provide evidence that its commitment to maintaining its current low pricing ensured that the vast majority of customers would always pay less with T-Mobile than with their competitors, both in the near and more distant future.

Therefore, without the requisite support for such claims, NAD recommended that the challenged advertising be modified to avoid conveying such messages. 

NAD noted, however, that nothing in its decision precludes the advertiser from formulating a more remote aspirational message as to its hopes and ambitions with regard to the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint, or from making truthful and non-misleading claims about its current pricing and commitment to maintaining low prices. 

In its advertiser statement, T-Mobile stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision . . . given that the ads in question stopped airing in July 2020” although it noted that it “strongly disagrees” with NAD’s view of its “aspirational goals not only as claims requiring substantiation, but as guarantees.” T-Mobile also stated its belief that the evidence it provided regarding pricing should have been sufficient support for its claims.

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.    

 

 

Media Inquiry