BBB National Programs Newsroom

NAD Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health-Related Claims for its Essential Oils; Advertiser to Appeal

For Immediate Release 

New York, NY – July 22, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Young Living Essential Oil, LC (Young Living) discontinue unsupported, health-related essential oil product claims of “therapeutic grade” and physical and/or mental health benefits, as these claims are unsupported. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery which do not require substantiation. The claims at issue were challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Young Living said it will appeal NAD’s decision to the National Advertising Review Board. 

NAD reviewed Young Living’s claim that its essential oils are “therapeutic” grade, and a range of specific claims that Young Living makes regarding the benefits of its oils. NAD determined that the claim of “therapeutic grade” conveys an unsupported message that the essential oils confer a beneficial healing physical or mental health effect on the body or mind. The advertiser argued that its “therapeutic grade” claim does not convey a medicinal or healing message, relying on the results of a consumer perception survey. After considering the survey methodology and results, NAD concluded that this survey was fundamentally flawed. NAD also considered the results of a consumer perception survey conducted by the challenger and determined that it was sufficiently reliable to demonstrate that Young Living’s “therapeutic grade” claim reasonably conveys a message that the essential oils provide a healthy or medicinal benefit, not simply a message of purity and quality. NAD came to a similar conclusion using its own expertise and judgment, noting that, at the very least, the reasonable consumer takeaway from this claim is that the oils provide some physical or mental benefit.   

NAD noted that specific product testing, in the form of competent and reliable scientific evidence, is required as support for the advertiser’s specific health-related benefit claims. However, Young Living did not submit any studies conducted on its essential oils and did not make the requisite showing that the results of the studies relied upon can be reliably extrapolated to support the claims. This includes claims that the advertiser’s essential oils: 

  • Will calm or relax consumers when applied or diffused, such as Dragon Time “can help promote feelings of stability and calm during occasional times of moodiness”; 

  • Will help relieve consumers’ feelings of anxiety when applied (or diffused), such as Bergamot Oil “[m]ay help relieve tension during times of occasional stress”; 

  • Will help consumers sleep, such as RC oil “May help support restful sleep” and other sleep related claims; 

  • Will bring product users clarity, focus, or alertness when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as “Brain Power is a blend of essential oils . . . to promote a sense of clarity and focus when used aromatically”; 

  • Can be used to treat symptoms associated with depression, such as Davana oil “boosts your positive outlook on life”; and 

  • Will help consumers increase or maintain their energy levels when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as Peppermint “helps to maintain energy levels when applied topically.” 

 

The advertiser agreed to permanently discontinue several claims that its essential oils and/or certain ingredients in the products: 

  • Promote feelings of calm and relaxation 

  • Help consumers sleep 

  • Provide clarity, focus, and/or alertness 

  • Energize 

  • Improve consumers’ mood and increase their motivation 

 

Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery, which do not require substantiation.  

In its advertiser’s statement, Young Living stated that it “disagrees with, and will appeal to NARB, NAD’s failure to credit valid survey data and published research in support of ‘therapeutic grade’ claims and claims that certain, carefully formulated products promote stability, calmness, relaxation, sleep, stress and tension relief, clarity, focus, energy, rational decision making, and alertness.” 

NAD Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health-Related Claims for its Essential Oils; Advertiser to Appeal

For Immediate Release 

New York, NY – July 22, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Young Living Essential Oil, LC (Young Living) discontinue unsupported, health-related essential oil product claims of “therapeutic grade” and physical and/or mental health benefits, as these claims are unsupported. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery which do not require substantiation. The claims at issue were challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Young Living said it will appeal NAD’s decision to the National Advertising Review Board. 

NAD reviewed Young Living’s claim that its essential oils are “therapeutic” grade, and a range of specific claims that Young Living makes regarding the benefits of its oils. NAD determined that the claim of “therapeutic grade” conveys an unsupported message that the essential oils confer a beneficial healing physical or mental health effect on the body or mind. The advertiser argued that its “therapeutic grade” claim does not convey a medicinal or healing message, relying on the results of a consumer perception survey. After considering the survey methodology and results, NAD concluded that this survey was fundamentally flawed. NAD also considered the results of a consumer perception survey conducted by the challenger and determined that it was sufficiently reliable to demonstrate that Young Living’s “therapeutic grade” claim reasonably conveys a message that the essential oils provide a healthy or medicinal benefit, not simply a message of purity and quality. NAD came to a similar conclusion using its own expertise and judgment, noting that, at the very least, the reasonable consumer takeaway from this claim is that the oils provide some physical or mental benefit.   

NAD noted that specific product testing, in the form of competent and reliable scientific evidence, is required as support for the advertiser’s specific health-related benefit claims. However, Young Living did not submit any studies conducted on its essential oils and did not make the requisite showing that the results of the studies relied upon can be reliably extrapolated to support the claims. This includes claims that the advertiser’s essential oils: 

  • Will calm or relax consumers when applied or diffused, such as Dragon Time “can help promote feelings of stability and calm during occasional times of moodiness”; 

  • Will help relieve consumers’ feelings of anxiety when applied (or diffused), such as Bergamot Oil “[m]ay help relieve tension during times of occasional stress”; 

  • Will help consumers sleep, such as RC oil “May help support restful sleep” and other sleep related claims; 

  • Will bring product users clarity, focus, or alertness when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as “Brain Power is a blend of essential oils . . . to promote a sense of clarity and focus when used aromatically”; 

  • Can be used to treat symptoms associated with depression, such as Davana oil “boosts your positive outlook on life”; and 

  • Will help consumers increase or maintain their energy levels when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as Peppermint “helps to maintain energy levels when applied topically.” 

 

The advertiser agreed to permanently discontinue several claims that its essential oils and/or certain ingredients in the products: 

  • Promote feelings of calm and relaxation 

  • Help consumers sleep 

  • Provide clarity, focus, and/or alertness 

  • Energize 

  • Improve consumers’ mood and increase their motivation 

 

Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery, which do not require substantiation.  

In its advertiser’s statement, Young Living stated that it “disagrees with, and will appeal to NARB, NAD’s failure to credit valid survey data and published research in support of ‘therapeutic grade’ claims and claims that certain, carefully formulated products promote stability, calmness, relaxation, sleep, stress and tension relief, clarity, focus, energy, rational decision making, and alertness.” 

Blog

Top 10 Reasons to Resolve Lemon Law Disputes with BBB AUTO LINE

If your vehicle is still under warranty and you have an issue that the dealership has been unable to resolve, you may be able to reach a resolution directly with the manufacturer – at no cost to you - through BBB AUTO LINE. We have assembled a list of ten ways BBB AUTO LINE provides optimal resolution solutions.
Read more
Blog

What to Know About the New York Lemon Law

As we continue our blog series reviewing state lemon laws, we turn our attention to New York State. True to its reputation for making its own rules, New York includes some distinctive aspects within its lemon laws.
Read more
Blog

Defining The 'S' In ESG And Navigating Disclosures

For businesses interested in making robust ESG disclosures, not only can the sheer number of frameworks and standards make ESG performance reporting seem overwhelming, the frameworks themselves can be a bit fuzzy on how they define and measure the "S" of ESG.
Read more
Blog

BBB AUTO LINE Marks a Milestone: 40 Years of Lemon Law Dispute Resolution

As the largest and longest-running vehicle dispute resolution program in the United States, BBB AUTO LINE’s 40 years of experience will drive its future course. Together, automakers and BBB AUTO LINE will keep paving the way to make neutral, mutually trusted, out-of-court resolution solutions accessible to consumers.
Read more

NAD Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health-Related Claims for its Essential Oils; Advertiser to Appeal

For Immediate Release 

New York, NY – July 22, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Young Living Essential Oil, LC (Young Living) discontinue unsupported, health-related essential oil product claims of “therapeutic grade” and physical and/or mental health benefits, as these claims are unsupported. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery which do not require substantiation. The claims at issue were challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Young Living said it will appeal NAD’s decision to the National Advertising Review Board. 

NAD reviewed Young Living’s claim that its essential oils are “therapeutic” grade, and a range of specific claims that Young Living makes regarding the benefits of its oils. NAD determined that the claim of “therapeutic grade” conveys an unsupported message that the essential oils confer a beneficial healing physical or mental health effect on the body or mind. The advertiser argued that its “therapeutic grade” claim does not convey a medicinal or healing message, relying on the results of a consumer perception survey. After considering the survey methodology and results, NAD concluded that this survey was fundamentally flawed. NAD also considered the results of a consumer perception survey conducted by the challenger and determined that it was sufficiently reliable to demonstrate that Young Living’s “therapeutic grade” claim reasonably conveys a message that the essential oils provide a healthy or medicinal benefit, not simply a message of purity and quality. NAD came to a similar conclusion using its own expertise and judgment, noting that, at the very least, the reasonable consumer takeaway from this claim is that the oils provide some physical or mental benefit.   

NAD noted that specific product testing, in the form of competent and reliable scientific evidence, is required as support for the advertiser’s specific health-related benefit claims. However, Young Living did not submit any studies conducted on its essential oils and did not make the requisite showing that the results of the studies relied upon can be reliably extrapolated to support the claims. This includes claims that the advertiser’s essential oils: 

  • Will calm or relax consumers when applied or diffused, such as Dragon Time “can help promote feelings of stability and calm during occasional times of moodiness”; 

  • Will help relieve consumers’ feelings of anxiety when applied (or diffused), such as Bergamot Oil “[m]ay help relieve tension during times of occasional stress”; 

  • Will help consumers sleep, such as RC oil “May help support restful sleep” and other sleep related claims; 

  • Will bring product users clarity, focus, or alertness when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as “Brain Power is a blend of essential oils . . . to promote a sense of clarity and focus when used aromatically”; 

  • Can be used to treat symptoms associated with depression, such as Davana oil “boosts your positive outlook on life”; and 

  • Will help consumers increase or maintain their energy levels when applied (or diffused) as directed, such as Peppermint “helps to maintain energy levels when applied topically.” 

 

The advertiser agreed to permanently discontinue several claims that its essential oils and/or certain ingredients in the products: 

  • Promote feelings of calm and relaxation 

  • Help consumers sleep 

  • Provide clarity, focus, and/or alertness 

  • Energize 

  • Improve consumers’ mood and increase their motivation 

 

Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits. NAD also determined that certain challenged claims constitute permissible puffery, which do not require substantiation.  

In its advertiser’s statement, Young Living stated that it “disagrees with, and will appeal to NARB, NAD’s failure to credit valid survey data and published research in support of ‘therapeutic grade’ claims and claims that certain, carefully formulated products promote stability, calmness, relaxation, sleep, stress and tension relief, clarity, focus, energy, rational decision making, and alertness.” 

 

 

Media Inquiry