BBB National Programs Newsroom

NARB Finds Supported Claims by Molekule that the PECO Filter of its MH1 Air Purifier Can Address Bioaerosol and VOC Pollution; Recommends Discontinuance or Modification of Other Claims, Including Discontinuance of Superiority Claims vs. HEPA Filters

For Immediate Release

Contact: Saveeta Dhanai, NARB Coordinator, 212.705.0115 / sdhanai@bbbnp.org

 

New York, NY – March 26, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) has determined that Molekule Inc. properly supported claims that the PECO technology filter of its MH1 Air Purifier (“MH1”) can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. The panel further found supported the general efficacy claim that “Molekule’s revolutionary nanotechnology destroys pollutants at the molecular level.” However, NARB recommended that Molekule discontinue or modify certain non-quantified pollution elimination claims for its MH1 device, and discontinue the challenged comparative superiority claims versus air purifiers that contain HEPA filters.

NARB is the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. The advertising at issue had been challenged by Dyson, Inc. before the National Advertising Division (“NAD”).  NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation.  Following NAD’s decision, Molekule appealed NAD’s findings regarding its non-quantified pollution elimination claims and comparative superiority vs. HEPA claims.

Molekule’s MH1 products use a pre-filter and a Photo Electrochemical Oxidation (“PECO”) filter, whereas Dyson’s air purifier products rely on High Efficiency Particulate Air (“HEPA”) filters and carbon filters. The advertising in question both discusses the benefits of PECO technology and compares those benefits to HEPA-filter technology. The two technologies act differently to reduce airborne pollutants. HEPA filters trap impurities as they pass through the filter, while filters based on PECO technology were asserted to destroy, rather than trap, the impurities.

The two systems also differ with respect to volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), certain types of carbon compounds that can participate in atmospheric photochemical reactions. The parties explained that VOCs are gases, not particles, and that HEPA filters are not designed to, and do not, trap VOCs. Rather, air filtration systems using HEPA filters also employ a carbon filter to address VOCs.

In the underlying decision, NAD found unsubstantiated, among other claims, quantified pollution-removal claims (for example “destroys 1 million allergens in 4 minutes”), references by the advertiser to certain published tests as “independent testing,” and challenged allergy and asthma symptom relief claims and recommended that those claims be discontinued. In response, Molekule agreed to implement NAD’s recommendations.

The NARB panel determined that the advertiser properly supported claims that its PECO technology filter can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. However, NARB agreed with NAD’s conclusions recommending discontinuance of Molekule’s claims that its MH1 device removes or destroys all pollutants in a room or completely eliminates such pollutants.  NARB also recommended, based on the state of the evidence in the NAD record, discontinuance of the challenged claims asserting superiority of Molekule’s PECO filters compared to HEPA filters.

Molekule stated that it will comply with the panel’s recommendations.

 

###

 

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): NARB is the appellate body for advertising industry self-regulation. NARB’s membership is composed of 87 professionals from three different categories: national advertisers (49 members), advertising agencies (26 members), and public members (12) made up of academics and former members of the public sector.

 

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs (BBB NP) fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. The programs were formerly administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. BBB NP is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs that include the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), BBB EU Privacy Shield, BBB AUTO LINE, Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), Children’s Confection Advertising Initiative (CCAI), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Digital Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program), and the Coalition for Better Advertising Dispute Resolution Program (CBA DRM). The programs are designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org

NARB Finds Supported Claims by Molekule that the PECO Filter of its MH1 Air Purifier Can Address Bioaerosol and VOC Pollution; Recommends Discontinuance or Modification of Other Claims, Including Discontinuance of Superiority Claims vs. HEPA Filters

For Immediate Release

Contact: Saveeta Dhanai, NARB Coordinator, 212.705.0115 / sdhanai@bbbnp.org

 

New York, NY – March 26, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) has determined that Molekule Inc. properly supported claims that the PECO technology filter of its MH1 Air Purifier (“MH1”) can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. The panel further found supported the general efficacy claim that “Molekule’s revolutionary nanotechnology destroys pollutants at the molecular level.” However, NARB recommended that Molekule discontinue or modify certain non-quantified pollution elimination claims for its MH1 device, and discontinue the challenged comparative superiority claims versus air purifiers that contain HEPA filters.

NARB is the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. The advertising at issue had been challenged by Dyson, Inc. before the National Advertising Division (“NAD”).  NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation.  Following NAD’s decision, Molekule appealed NAD’s findings regarding its non-quantified pollution elimination claims and comparative superiority vs. HEPA claims.

Molekule’s MH1 products use a pre-filter and a Photo Electrochemical Oxidation (“PECO”) filter, whereas Dyson’s air purifier products rely on High Efficiency Particulate Air (“HEPA”) filters and carbon filters. The advertising in question both discusses the benefits of PECO technology and compares those benefits to HEPA-filter technology. The two technologies act differently to reduce airborne pollutants. HEPA filters trap impurities as they pass through the filter, while filters based on PECO technology were asserted to destroy, rather than trap, the impurities.

The two systems also differ with respect to volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), certain types of carbon compounds that can participate in atmospheric photochemical reactions. The parties explained that VOCs are gases, not particles, and that HEPA filters are not designed to, and do not, trap VOCs. Rather, air filtration systems using HEPA filters also employ a carbon filter to address VOCs.

In the underlying decision, NAD found unsubstantiated, among other claims, quantified pollution-removal claims (for example “destroys 1 million allergens in 4 minutes”), references by the advertiser to certain published tests as “independent testing,” and challenged allergy and asthma symptom relief claims and recommended that those claims be discontinued. In response, Molekule agreed to implement NAD’s recommendations.

The NARB panel determined that the advertiser properly supported claims that its PECO technology filter can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. However, NARB agreed with NAD’s conclusions recommending discontinuance of Molekule’s claims that its MH1 device removes or destroys all pollutants in a room or completely eliminates such pollutants.  NARB also recommended, based on the state of the evidence in the NAD record, discontinuance of the challenged claims asserting superiority of Molekule’s PECO filters compared to HEPA filters.

Molekule stated that it will comply with the panel’s recommendations.

 

###

 

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): NARB is the appellate body for advertising industry self-regulation. NARB’s membership is composed of 87 professionals from three different categories: national advertisers (49 members), advertising agencies (26 members), and public members (12) made up of academics and former members of the public sector.

 

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs (BBB NP) fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. The programs were formerly administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. BBB NP is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs that include the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), BBB EU Privacy Shield, BBB AUTO LINE, Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), Children’s Confection Advertising Initiative (CCAI), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Digital Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program), and the Coalition for Better Advertising Dispute Resolution Program (CBA DRM). The programs are designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org

Blog

Are used cars covered under lemon laws?

Do your homework to make sure the used car you plan to buy is not a lemon, and if it is, does the lemon law cover it? The answer may depend on where you purchased the vehicle or where you live.
Read more
Blog

Case Study: Getting to Compliance with CARU and COPPA

In a recent case, CARU worked with TickTalk to help them achieve compliance with CARU’s Privacy Guidelines and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). CARU sat down with TickTalk once the case had closed to discuss their experience as well as some of the privacy challenges many companies face in the children’s space.
Read more
Blog

What to Know About the Georgia Lemon Law

BBB AUTO LINE provides an overview of each state’s lemon laws. In our ongoing blog series, we offer further insights on the laws for select states, and how BBB AUTO LINE can support consumers with lemon law disputes. Florida, California, and Texas have been covered. This post reviews the nuances of the lemon law in the Peachtree State – Georgia.
Read more
Blog

The TAPP Roadmap: Helping U.S. Companies Responsibly Collect and Manage Teenager Data

The TeenAge Privacy Program (TAPP) Roadmap was designed to assist any business that wishes to engage proactively with teen consumers, providing an operational framework to map the broad spectrum of potential harms impacting teens onto a concrete set of operational considerations.
Read more

NARB Finds Supported Claims by Molekule that the PECO Filter of its MH1 Air Purifier Can Address Bioaerosol and VOC Pollution; Recommends Discontinuance or Modification of Other Claims, Including Discontinuance of Superiority Claims vs. HEPA Filters

For Immediate Release

Contact: Saveeta Dhanai, NARB Coordinator, 212.705.0115 / sdhanai@bbbnp.org

 

New York, NY – March 26, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) has determined that Molekule Inc. properly supported claims that the PECO technology filter of its MH1 Air Purifier (“MH1”) can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. The panel further found supported the general efficacy claim that “Molekule’s revolutionary nanotechnology destroys pollutants at the molecular level.” However, NARB recommended that Molekule discontinue or modify certain non-quantified pollution elimination claims for its MH1 device, and discontinue the challenged comparative superiority claims versus air purifiers that contain HEPA filters.

NARB is the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. The advertising at issue had been challenged by Dyson, Inc. before the National Advertising Division (“NAD”).  NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation.  Following NAD’s decision, Molekule appealed NAD’s findings regarding its non-quantified pollution elimination claims and comparative superiority vs. HEPA claims.

Molekule’s MH1 products use a pre-filter and a Photo Electrochemical Oxidation (“PECO”) filter, whereas Dyson’s air purifier products rely on High Efficiency Particulate Air (“HEPA”) filters and carbon filters. The advertising in question both discusses the benefits of PECO technology and compares those benefits to HEPA-filter technology. The two technologies act differently to reduce airborne pollutants. HEPA filters trap impurities as they pass through the filter, while filters based on PECO technology were asserted to destroy, rather than trap, the impurities.

The two systems also differ with respect to volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), certain types of carbon compounds that can participate in atmospheric photochemical reactions. The parties explained that VOCs are gases, not particles, and that HEPA filters are not designed to, and do not, trap VOCs. Rather, air filtration systems using HEPA filters also employ a carbon filter to address VOCs.

In the underlying decision, NAD found unsubstantiated, among other claims, quantified pollution-removal claims (for example “destroys 1 million allergens in 4 minutes”), references by the advertiser to certain published tests as “independent testing,” and challenged allergy and asthma symptom relief claims and recommended that those claims be discontinued. In response, Molekule agreed to implement NAD’s recommendations.

The NARB panel determined that the advertiser properly supported claims that its PECO technology filter can address bioaerosol and VOC pollution. However, NARB agreed with NAD’s conclusions recommending discontinuance of Molekule’s claims that its MH1 device removes or destroys all pollutants in a room or completely eliminates such pollutants.  NARB also recommended, based on the state of the evidence in the NAD record, discontinuance of the challenged claims asserting superiority of Molekule’s PECO filters compared to HEPA filters.

Molekule stated that it will comply with the panel’s recommendations.

 

###

 

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): NARB is the appellate body for advertising industry self-regulation. NARB’s membership is composed of 87 professionals from three different categories: national advertisers (49 members), advertising agencies (26 members), and public members (12) made up of academics and former members of the public sector.

 

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs (BBB NP) fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. The programs were formerly administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. BBB NP is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs that include the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), BBB EU Privacy Shield, BBB AUTO LINE, Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), Children’s Confection Advertising Initiative (CCAI), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Digital Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program), and the Coalition for Better Advertising Dispute Resolution Program (CBA DRM). The programs are designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org

 

 

Media Inquiry