BBB National Programs Newsroom

NARB Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health and Wellness Benefit Claims

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – November 24, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, has recommended that Young Living Essential Oils, LC (Young Living) discontinue “therapeutic grade” claims for its “essential oils,” as well as unsupported health and wellness benefit claims.

The advertising at issue, as well as other claims, had been challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (SCJ) before the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs. Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6385), Young Living appealed all aspects of NAD’s findings adverse to it.

Young Living sells “essential oils” (i.e. oils extracted from herbs, flowers, and other plants) online and through a direct-sales network. These products are considered “aromatherapy” alternative-medicine products. Among the key essential oils in Young Living’s aromatherapy products are lavender, Hinoki, Ylang-Ylang, Valerian, bergamot, davana, peppermint, rosemary, and grapefruit. Many of the Young Living products are “blends,” meaning they include two or more essential oils. Wellness benefits referred to in Young Living advertising for one or more of its aromatherapy products include:

  • Promoting feelings of stability and calm
  • Promoting restful sleep
  • Improving clarity, focus, or alertness
  • Improving mood and motivation


All of Young Living’s aromatherapy products (several hundred) are labeled “therapeutic grade.” The NARB panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” is unsupported and recommended that it be discontinued. 

  • The panel determined that the health and wellness message conveyed by the term “therapeutic grade” was not supported with the requisite scientific evidence. 
  • The panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” conveys the unsupported message that Young Living’s product is rated therapeutic under an existing set of third-party standards for evaluating essential oils. 


The NARB panel also determined that Young Living’s health-related product claims lack proper scientific substantiation and recommended that they be discontinued. 

  • The panel accepted as valid the evidence showing that the chemical make-up/composition of essential oils can vary widely. 
  • The panel noted that Young Living has no information concerning the essential oils used in the published studies it relies on for scientific support for the claimed efficacy of its own products.
  • The panel noted that there was no evidence in the record that blending different essential oils into one product, like Young Living does with its “blends,” does not have an impact on the claimed benefits.


Young Living stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision, but noted that the company disagreed with the legal and factual findings of the original NAD case because, according to Young Living, “NAD only relied on the summaries of the third-party studies submitted as substantiation and did not ask to have the full study reports submitted.” According to Young Living, “without reviewing the complete studies at issue, NAD should not have rejected the relevance of the results in peer reviewed and published studies conducted by extremely well-qualified researchers from institutions such as Wesleyan University and Duke University.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

NARB Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health and Wellness Benefit Claims

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – November 24, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, has recommended that Young Living Essential Oils, LC (Young Living) discontinue “therapeutic grade” claims for its “essential oils,” as well as unsupported health and wellness benefit claims.

The advertising at issue, as well as other claims, had been challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (SCJ) before the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs. Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6385), Young Living appealed all aspects of NAD’s findings adverse to it.

Young Living sells “essential oils” (i.e. oils extracted from herbs, flowers, and other plants) online and through a direct-sales network. These products are considered “aromatherapy” alternative-medicine products. Among the key essential oils in Young Living’s aromatherapy products are lavender, Hinoki, Ylang-Ylang, Valerian, bergamot, davana, peppermint, rosemary, and grapefruit. Many of the Young Living products are “blends,” meaning they include two or more essential oils. Wellness benefits referred to in Young Living advertising for one or more of its aromatherapy products include:

  • Promoting feelings of stability and calm
  • Promoting restful sleep
  • Improving clarity, focus, or alertness
  • Improving mood and motivation


All of Young Living’s aromatherapy products (several hundred) are labeled “therapeutic grade.” The NARB panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” is unsupported and recommended that it be discontinued. 

  • The panel determined that the health and wellness message conveyed by the term “therapeutic grade” was not supported with the requisite scientific evidence. 
  • The panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” conveys the unsupported message that Young Living’s product is rated therapeutic under an existing set of third-party standards for evaluating essential oils. 


The NARB panel also determined that Young Living’s health-related product claims lack proper scientific substantiation and recommended that they be discontinued. 

  • The panel accepted as valid the evidence showing that the chemical make-up/composition of essential oils can vary widely. 
  • The panel noted that Young Living has no information concerning the essential oils used in the published studies it relies on for scientific support for the claimed efficacy of its own products.
  • The panel noted that there was no evidence in the record that blending different essential oils into one product, like Young Living does with its “blends,” does not have an impact on the claimed benefits.


Young Living stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision, but noted that the company disagreed with the legal and factual findings of the original NAD case because, according to Young Living, “NAD only relied on the summaries of the third-party studies submitted as substantiation and did not ask to have the full study reports submitted.” According to Young Living, “without reviewing the complete studies at issue, NAD should not have rejected the relevance of the results in peer reviewed and published studies conducted by extremely well-qualified researchers from institutions such as Wesleyan University and Duke University.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

Blog

Harmful Stereotyping in Advertising Must Not Be a “Forever Problem”

Though the annual celebration of Black History Month is drawing to a close, the plethora of issues raised by the study of Black history must always remain top of mind. For those of us who work in truth in advertising at BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division (NAD), we are paying very close attention to the issues of diversity and stereotyping, as presented in various forms of advertising. Developing a mechanism to addressing representation in advertisements would not be simple, but the time is now to start the conversation. Harmful stereotypes in advertising must not be a forever problem.
Read more
Blog

5 Tips for Truthful and Transparent Influencer Marketing and Product Reviews

BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division is dedicated to truth-in-advertising. To help you ensure that influencer marketing and the use of product reviews in your advertising is both transparent and truthful, we offer the following five tips.
Read more
Blog

In 2021, Consumer And Stakeholder Privacy Is About Defining Trust

As business and nonprofit leaders navigate the Fourth Industrial Revolution, consumer and stakeholder privacy has become a matter of defining trust. As new digital services and connected devices fueled by personal data flourish, consumers’ reasonable expectation of privacy shifts. If expectations do not match reality, it can lead to gaps in trust and new paths for litigation and regulatory enforcement. In this piece I outline a few 2021 privacy developments business and nonprofit leaders should note.
Read more
Blog

Broadening the Definition of Express and Implicit Representation in Children’s Advertising

One way to gauge exactly how far we have come in implementing diversity and inclusion is by analyzing what we see on our screens, particularly in advertising. The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) recognizes the special vulnerabilities of children with their limited knowledge, experience, sophistication, and maturity and often places itself in children’s shoes to gain insight when assessing the role advertisement has in shaping their perception.
Read more

NARB Recommends that Young Living Essential Oils Discontinue “Therapeutic Grade” and Health and Wellness Benefit Claims

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703-247-9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – November 24, 2020 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, has recommended that Young Living Essential Oils, LC (Young Living) discontinue “therapeutic grade” claims for its “essential oils,” as well as unsupported health and wellness benefit claims.

The advertising at issue, as well as other claims, had been challenged by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (SCJ) before the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs. Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 6385), Young Living appealed all aspects of NAD’s findings adverse to it.

Young Living sells “essential oils” (i.e. oils extracted from herbs, flowers, and other plants) online and through a direct-sales network. These products are considered “aromatherapy” alternative-medicine products. Among the key essential oils in Young Living’s aromatherapy products are lavender, Hinoki, Ylang-Ylang, Valerian, bergamot, davana, peppermint, rosemary, and grapefruit. Many of the Young Living products are “blends,” meaning they include two or more essential oils. Wellness benefits referred to in Young Living advertising for one or more of its aromatherapy products include:

  • Promoting feelings of stability and calm
  • Promoting restful sleep
  • Improving clarity, focus, or alertness
  • Improving mood and motivation


All of Young Living’s aromatherapy products (several hundred) are labeled “therapeutic grade.” The NARB panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” is unsupported and recommended that it be discontinued. 

  • The panel determined that the health and wellness message conveyed by the term “therapeutic grade” was not supported with the requisite scientific evidence. 
  • The panel concluded that the term “therapeutic grade” conveys the unsupported message that Young Living’s product is rated therapeutic under an existing set of third-party standards for evaluating essential oils. 


The NARB panel also determined that Young Living’s health-related product claims lack proper scientific substantiation and recommended that they be discontinued. 

  • The panel accepted as valid the evidence showing that the chemical make-up/composition of essential oils can vary widely. 
  • The panel noted that Young Living has no information concerning the essential oils used in the published studies it relies on for scientific support for the claimed efficacy of its own products.
  • The panel noted that there was no evidence in the record that blending different essential oils into one product, like Young Living does with its “blends,” does not have an impact on the claimed benefits.


Young Living stated that it will comply with NARB’s decision, but noted that the company disagreed with the legal and factual findings of the original NAD case because, according to Young Living, “NAD only relied on the summaries of the third-party studies submitted as substantiation and did not ask to have the full study reports submitted.” According to Young Living, “without reviewing the complete studies at issue, NAD should not have rejected the relevance of the results in peer reviewed and published studies conducted by extremely well-qualified researchers from institutions such as Wesleyan University and Duke University.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Review Board (NARB): The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the appellate body for BBB National Programs’ advertising self-regulatory programs. NARB’s panel members include 87 distinguished volunteer professionals from the national advertising industry, agencies, and public members, such as academics and former members of the public sector. NARB serves as a layer of independent industry peer review that helps engender trust and compliance in NAD, CARU, and DSSRC matters. 

Media Inquiry

*Required fields