BBB National Programs Newsroom

Primark Modifies its Advertising to Comply with Children’s Advertising Review Unit Guidelines

For Immediate Release 
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs 

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org 

McLean, VA – July 14, 2022 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), a division of BBB National Programs, has determined that Primark US Corp.’s product advertising to children failed to comply with CARU’s Advertising Guidelines, specifically a new provision, which became effective in January of this year, stating that advertising should not portray or encourage negative social stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify its gender-restrictive advertising and Primark has agreed to the modifications.   

This case involves advertising messages on Primark children’s clothing that CARU determined to be directed to children under age 13, making them subject to CARU’s Advertising Guidelines. The Primark advertisements in question, which appeared on the Primark website, on social media, and on in-store advertising came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring of child-directed advertising in the marketplace.

Some representative examples of the advertised messages include:

  • Slogans on shirts advertised to girls such as “Be Kind, Be Happy,” “Kindness always wins,” “Always Perfect,” “Grateful, humble and optimistic,” and “Be good, do good.”
  • Slogans on shirts advertised to boys such as "Change the game,” “Born to win,” “Power,” “Champion,” “Total Icon,” and “Awesome Adventures.” 

 

CARU’s inquiry assessed the messaging to children resulting from these gender-restrictive slogans. CARU found that Primark’s separate lines of messaging advertised to girls and boys created a dichotomous world of goals and attributes – those appropriate for girls and those appropriate for boys – that portrayed or encouraged negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. 

Based on these findings, CARU recommended that Primark’s product advertising be modified so that the messages do not portray or encourage negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU further recommended that Primark advertising be respectful of human dignity and diversity. 

Primark agreed to comply with CARU’s recommendations, informing CARU that it had already begun an internal review of issues of gender, race and ethnicity, physical and intellectual disabilities, and other personal characteristics relating to its children’s clothing and campaign imagery to ensure its products, sales, and marketing efforts reflect the company’s values of inclusivity. Primark has made several changes based on CARU’s recommendations and has indicated it plans to continue improvements to how it develops, promotes, and displays its products advertised to children.  

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

Primark Modifies its Advertising to Comply with Children’s Advertising Review Unit Guidelines

For Immediate Release 
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs 

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org 

McLean, VA – July 14, 2022 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), a division of BBB National Programs, has determined that Primark US Corp.’s product advertising to children failed to comply with CARU’s Advertising Guidelines, specifically a new provision, which became effective in January of this year, stating that advertising should not portray or encourage negative social stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify its gender-restrictive advertising and Primark has agreed to the modifications.   

This case involves advertising messages on Primark children’s clothing that CARU determined to be directed to children under age 13, making them subject to CARU’s Advertising Guidelines. The Primark advertisements in question, which appeared on the Primark website, on social media, and on in-store advertising came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring of child-directed advertising in the marketplace.

Some representative examples of the advertised messages include:

  • Slogans on shirts advertised to girls such as “Be Kind, Be Happy,” “Kindness always wins,” “Always Perfect,” “Grateful, humble and optimistic,” and “Be good, do good.”
  • Slogans on shirts advertised to boys such as "Change the game,” “Born to win,” “Power,” “Champion,” “Total Icon,” and “Awesome Adventures.” 

 

CARU’s inquiry assessed the messaging to children resulting from these gender-restrictive slogans. CARU found that Primark’s separate lines of messaging advertised to girls and boys created a dichotomous world of goals and attributes – those appropriate for girls and those appropriate for boys – that portrayed or encouraged negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. 

Based on these findings, CARU recommended that Primark’s product advertising be modified so that the messages do not portray or encourage negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU further recommended that Primark advertising be respectful of human dignity and diversity. 

Primark agreed to comply with CARU’s recommendations, informing CARU that it had already begun an internal review of issues of gender, race and ethnicity, physical and intellectual disabilities, and other personal characteristics relating to its children’s clothing and campaign imagery to ensure its products, sales, and marketing efforts reflect the company’s values of inclusivity. Primark has made several changes based on CARU’s recommendations and has indicated it plans to continue improvements to how it develops, promotes, and displays its products advertised to children.  

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

Blog

What to Know About the Ohio Lemon Law

Is your vehicle a lemon? If it is, what can you do? We’ve looked at how North Carolina, New York, Georgia, Texas, California, and Florida define a lemon. Now it is time to look at the state of Ohio.
Read more
Blog

West Virginia vs. EPA: Opportunities for Independent Industry Self-Regulation

Regardless of where one stands on whether the U.S. Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. EPA correctly, the decision provides an opportunity for business to play a meaningful role in finding solutions to relevant public policy issues through the exploration – and potential widespread adoption – of independent industry self-regulation.
Read more
Blog

Expanding Accountability for DEIB in National Advertising

Beginning today, NAD's procedures have been revised to join CARU in holding advertisers accountable for advertising that portrays or encourages misleading and harmful social stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination.
Read more
Blog

From Regional to Global: Profiling the Expansion of CBPR

In this series, we are going to explore how the newly formed CBPR Global Forum came to be and how it will complement other privacy frameworks to promote the free flow of data internationally.
Read more

Primark Modifies its Advertising to Comply with Children’s Advertising Review Unit Guidelines

For Immediate Release 
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs 

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org 

McLean, VA – July 14, 2022 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), a division of BBB National Programs, has determined that Primark US Corp.’s product advertising to children failed to comply with CARU’s Advertising Guidelines, specifically a new provision, which became effective in January of this year, stating that advertising should not portray or encourage negative social stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify its gender-restrictive advertising and Primark has agreed to the modifications.   

This case involves advertising messages on Primark children’s clothing that CARU determined to be directed to children under age 13, making them subject to CARU’s Advertising Guidelines. The Primark advertisements in question, which appeared on the Primark website, on social media, and on in-store advertising came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring of child-directed advertising in the marketplace.

Some representative examples of the advertised messages include:

  • Slogans on shirts advertised to girls such as “Be Kind, Be Happy,” “Kindness always wins,” “Always Perfect,” “Grateful, humble and optimistic,” and “Be good, do good.”
  • Slogans on shirts advertised to boys such as "Change the game,” “Born to win,” “Power,” “Champion,” “Total Icon,” and “Awesome Adventures.” 

 

CARU’s inquiry assessed the messaging to children resulting from these gender-restrictive slogans. CARU found that Primark’s separate lines of messaging advertised to girls and boys created a dichotomous world of goals and attributes – those appropriate for girls and those appropriate for boys – that portrayed or encouraged negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. 

Based on these findings, CARU recommended that Primark’s product advertising be modified so that the messages do not portray or encourage negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU further recommended that Primark advertising be respectful of human dignity and diversity. 

Primark agreed to comply with CARU’s recommendations, informing CARU that it had already begun an internal review of issues of gender, race and ethnicity, physical and intellectual disabilities, and other personal characteristics relating to its children’s clothing and campaign imagery to ensure its products, sales, and marketing efforts reflect the company’s values of inclusivity. Primark has made several changes based on CARU’s recommendations and has indicated it plans to continue improvements to how it develops, promotes, and displays its products advertised to children.  

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

Media Inquiry