Ad Watchers: Are you taking care of your health (claims)?

April 5, 2023

AdWatchers on Health Claims

 

Now more than ever consumers are paying attention to their health and wellness. Research indicates that consumers see health and wellness as ‘essential-spend categories.’ Not surprisingly, many brands see this as an opportunity to advertise a new product or service that will help a consumer achieve better health. But consumers aren’t the only ones paying attention. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is paying attention to the health-related claims brands are making, including the substantiation the advertiser has to back up those health claims. 


In this episode of Ad Watchers, hosts Dan and Annie break down the FTC’s new Health Products Compliance Guidance, which outlines how to ensure that claims about benefits and safety of health-related products are truthful, not misleading, and supported by science.

__________________________________________

Related Resources

FTC’s New Health Claims Guidance: What You Need to Know

Health Products Compliance Guidance

What Evidence Do You Need to Support Health Claims?

__________________________________________

 

Shownotes

In the first episode of season 3 of Ad Watchers, Annie Ugurlayan, the Assistant Director at the National Advertising Division (NAD), is joined by new host Dan Range, an attorney at NAD, to dive into the recently updated health product compliance guidance from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They touch upon the changes in the updated guidance and provide additional resources for those interested in deepening their understanding of claim substantiation for health-related claims.


01:44 - Annie explains that before this newly updated advertising guide, the FTC’s standards were detailed in a document called “Dietary Supplements: An Advertising Guide for Industry.” This guide was published in 1998 in response to a significant increase in the number of dietary supplement products and the uses for which they were promoted. The FTC aimed to answer questions about how policies and enforcement practices related to the new products, particularly in light of the 1994 Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act, which changed the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) involvement in regulating supplement labeling.


02:46 - On December 20, 2022, the FTC released the Health Products Compliance Guidance, replacing the 1998 document. Unlike its predecessor, the new guidance applies to all health-related claims, not just those relating to dietary supplements. 


This updated document incorporates FTC cases and product innovations from the past 20 years. It provides numerous examples to clarify the level and type of evidence required to substantiate health-related claims. Although much of the guidance remains the same, this update highlights important changes and reiterates significant issues. It serves as a reminder of the FTC's ongoing monitoring of advertising for health-related products.


03:34 - Annie wrote a blog diving into the differences and similarities between the two documents. She explains that—despite the expansion of purview—the heart of the document remains the same. Health claims must be well substantiated with scientific evidence, and the substantiation must be relevant to the specific product.


She closes the article with some helpful tips for advertisers: be sure to be laser-focused on the quality of evidence and always scrutinize third-party sources as much as possible. Advertisers are ultimately responsible for anything they say about their product, so the best practice is to go to the furthest lengths possible to ensure the truthfulness and accuracy of each claim.


17:02 - When warning advertisers against mischaracterizing health claims, Annie cites Example 48 in The Health Products Compliance Guide, which states, “Advertisers should be careful not to mischaracterize the extent to which a product or claim has been reviewed, authorized, or approved by the FDA.”


The example given is a product advertised as “Meeting a FDA Qualified Health Claim.” This is not a widely used term that consumers will recognize or understand. In fact, they may misconstrue the phrasing as one that communicates FDA approval or promotion. It’s not untrue, but it’s misleading nonetheless.


Despite the lack of falsities, health claims can still be deceptive to consumers who don’t possess all the necessary information. The burden lies on advertisers to avoid mischaracterization. To do so, they must understand the context in which their audience will be viewing an advertisement and communicate transparently through that lens.


22:53 - To advertise responsibly, marketers must be vigilant. They must understand the science behind their health claims and stay aware of new tests with new results. They must be careful about the claims they make and the reviews they publish. Americans spend billions of dollars annually on food and supplements that they hope will improve their wellness. Advertisers have a responsibility to provide consumers with as much transparency as possible to help them make informed decisions about their well-being.


The FTC provides blogs and other resources to help advertisers understand this responsibility. Read the FTC’s Health Products Compliance Guidance and supplemental resources, scrutinize every promotion about your product, and do your part to help consumers take care of their health.

Subscribe to receive a notification when new episodes of The Ad Watchers are available.

Latest Podcasts

Podcast

Likely to be Accessed: Do You Know Who Your Users Are?

Join us for this episode of Priv, where Dona Fraser is joined by Phyllis Marcus to discuss the broad operational, financial, and logistical impacts and challenges of trying to protect both children and teens online under the same laws and regulations. 

Listen to the Podcast
Podcast

Ad Watchers: Clear and Conspicuous Disclosures: Can You Read the Fine Print?

From small fonts to fast talking and distracting music, our hosts revisit this common issue area in advertising law, discuss what it takes for a disclosure to be considered clear and conspicuous, and share some lessons learned from a series of advertisements, both print and in TV commercials, that didn’t quite meet the clear and conspicuous standard. 

Listen to the Podcast
Podcast

Breaking Down AdTech: Cookies and Pixels and SDKs, Oh My!

This episode of Priv breaks down the most talked about issues in the adtech space, including the impact of the death of the cookie, the focus of regulators on the newest kid on the block - the pixel, lessons learned from recent SDK legal cases, what all of this looks like for children and teens, and what the legislative and regulatory road ahead looks like.

Listen to the Podcast
Podcast

Ad Watchers: The best subject in advertising law: Is it puffery?

For this episode of Ad Watchers, join us for Eric’s favorite ad law topic: puffery, an exaggerated, blustering, or boastful statement or general claim that could only be understood to be an expression of opinion, not a statement of fact. But where is the line between puffery and a claim that needs a reasonable basis?

Listen to the Podcast