Direct Selling Self-Regulation Council

DSSRC Case Decisions and Administratively Resolved Inquiry Summaries

Case Decisions

Case

Case #156-2024: Administrative Closure – Cabi, LLC

Cabi, LLC ("Company") is a multi-level direct selling company, headquartered in Carson, CA and founded in 2002, that sells clothing and personal accessories.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #155-2024: Administrative Closure – Touchstone Crystal, Inc.

Touchstone Crystal, Inc. (“Touchstone Crystal” or the "Company") is a multi-level direct selling company that sells jewelry and accessories.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #154-2024: Administrative Closure – Unicity International

Unicity International ("Company") is a multi-level direct selling company headquartered in Provo, UT and founded in 1986 that sells nutritional supplements and self-care products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #153-2024: Monitoring Inquiry – Trades of Hope LLC

Trades of Hope LLC (“Trades of Hope” or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company that specializes in the sale of an assortment of goods including jewelry, personal accessories, home decor, and coffee. According to its website, Trades of Hope purchases its products from local artisans around the globe, including from Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Uganda, Kenya, Peru,...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #152-2024: Administrative Closure – ibuumerang, Ltd

ibuumerang, Ltd (“ibuumerang” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that offers discount travel for its members. The Company is headquartered in Houston, Texas and was founded in 2019.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #151-2024: Administrative Closure – Ruby Ribbon

Ruby Ribbon ("Company") is a multi-level direct selling company located in Burlingame, CA that was founded in 2011 and sells shapewear, athleisure, and intimates.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #150-2024: Administrative Closure – Vida Divina Worldwide, Inc.

Vida Divina Worldwide, Inc. (“Vida Divina” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that markets health and wellness products, including beverages and nutritional supplements. The Company is headquartered in Ontario, Canada and was founded in 2016. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #149-2024: Administrative Closure – Innov8tive Nutrition

Innov8tive Nutrition ("Company") is a multi-level direct selling company that sells nutritional supplements and self-care products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #148-2024: Monitoring Inquiry – LiveGood, Inc. USA

LiveGood Inc. USA (“LiveGood” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that sells a variety of multivitamins and supplements with a focus on sleep aids, inflammation management, muscle recovery and weight management. The Company is headquartered in Jupiter, Florida and was founded in 2022. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #147-2024: Monitoring Inquiry – PaperPie f/k/a Usborne Books & More

PaperPie f/k/a Usborne Books & More (“PaperPie” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that was founded in 1989 and based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.1 The Company distributes children’s books and educational products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #146-2023: Administrative Closure – Enzacta USA

Enzacta USA (“Enzacta or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that sells nutritional and wellness products. The Company is headquartered in Cheyenne, Wyoming and was founded in 2003. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #145-2023: Administrative Closure – Tranont

Tranont (or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company based in Utah. Founded in 2013, the Company sells health and wellness products, including a line of CBD products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #144-2023: NGO Inquiry – Modere USA, Inc.

Modere USA, Inc. (“Modere” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company founded in 2012 and based in Newport Beach, California that markets health, beauty, and wellness products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #143-2023: Administrative Closure – Traveling Vineyards

Traveling Vineyards (or the “Company”) was a direct selling company based in Ipswich, Massachusetts. The Company was established in 2010 and sells boutique wines. 

 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #142-2023: Administrative Closure – Globallee, Inc.

Globallee, Inc. (“Globallee” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company located in Irving, Texas, founded in 2019. The Company sells various health and wellness supplements and has offices in Japan, Canada, Australia, and the United States.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #141-2023: Administrative Closure – Red Aspen, LLC

Red Aspen, LLC, (“Red Aspen” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that markets beauty and cosmetic products. The Company is headquartered in Meridian, Idaho and was founded in 2017. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #140-2023: Administrative Closure – Younique, LLC

Younique, LLC (or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company based in Utah that sells beauty products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #139-2023: NGO Inquiry – Elomir, Inc.

Elomir, Inc. (“Elomir” or the “Company”) sells nutritional supplements including its flagship product, Axis Klärity. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring process, which monitors advertising and marketing claims disseminated by direct selling companies and their salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #138-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Thrive Life, LLC

Thrive Life, LLC is a direct selling company that manufactures and markets freeze-dried and rehydrated foods. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring process, which monitors advertising and marketing claims disseminated by direct selling companies and their salesforce members.

 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #137-2023: Administrative Closure – Herbalife International of America, Inc.

Herbalife International of America, Inc., (“Herbalife” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company that sells nutritional and wellness products. The Company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California and was founded in 1980. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #136-2023: Administrative Closure – Grace & Heart

Grace & Heart (or the “Company”) was a direct selling company based in California. The Company was established in 2015 and sold fashion jewelry. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #135-2023: Administrative Closure – Global Domains International

Global Domains International is a direct-selling company based in California that sells domain names via an affiliate network. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring process, which monitors advertising and marketing claims disseminated by direct selling companies and their salesforce members. 

 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #134-2023: Compliance Inquiry – B-Epic Worldwide, LLC

B-Epic Worldwide LLC is a Utah-based multi-level marketing company that sells health and wellness products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #133-2023: Government Referral – Sweet Minerals, LLC

Sweet Minerals, LLC (“Sweet Minerals” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company based in Pasadena, Maryland. The company was founded in 2011 and markets makeup, personal care, skin care, and cosmetic products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #132-2023: Administrative Closure – jBloom Designs

jBloom Designs (“jBloom” or the “Company”) is a multi-level marketing company that sells custom jewelry. The Company is headquartered in St. Peters, MO and founded in 2013.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #131-2023: Compliance Inquiry – Seint Beauty

Seint Beauty (“Seint” or the “Company”), formerly Maskcara Beauty, is a multi-level marketing company founded in 2013 and based in St. George, Utah.
Read the Decision
Case

Case #130-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Healy World

Healy World, Inc. (“Healy World” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company based in Mainz, Germany with its domestic headquarters in Orlando, Florida.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #129-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Zinzino, LLC

Zinzino, LLC (“Zinzino” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company founded in 2005 that offers nutritional supplements to consumers. The Company is headquartered in Frölunda, Sweden and has a subsidiary in Jupiter, Florida.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #128-2023: Compliance Report – The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC

The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC (“JuicePlus” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company founded in 1970 and based in Collierville, Tennessee. The Company markets fruit and vegetable juice extract supplements.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #127-2023: Administrative Closure – Traci Lynn Jewelry

Traci Lynn Jewelry (or the “Company”) was a direct selling company based in Florida. The Company was established in 1989 and sold affordable fashion jewelry. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #126-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Zallevo, LLC

Zallevo, LLC (“Zallevo” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company founded in 2020 and based in St. George, Utah. The Company markets health and wellness products focusing on weight loss and anxiety/stress reduction.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #125-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Pink Zebra

Pink Zebra At Home (or the “Company”) is a direct selling company founded in 2011 and based in Sugar Land, Texas. The Company markets home fragrance and décor products including a wide range of items such as scented wax melts, candles, reed diffusers, room sprays, and other related accessories.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #124-2023: Government Referral – Tori Belle Cosmetics

Tori Belle Cosmetics (“Tori Belle” or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company founded in 2019 and based in Woodinville, Washington. The Company markets beauty and cosmetic products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #123-2023: Administrative Closure – Seint Beauty

Seint Beauty (“Seint” or the “Company”), formerly Maskcara Beauty, is a multi-level marketing company founded in 2013 and based in St. George, Utah. The Company markets consumer and personal care products with a focus on cosmetics and cosmetic accessories.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #122-2023: Government Referral – iCoinPro

iCoinPro (or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company that markets education, information, and training for cryptocurrency services. The Company was founded in 2017 and is located in Carson City, Nevada.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #120-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Pure Haven, LLC

Pure Haven, LLC (“Pure Haven” or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company founded in 2009 and based in Rhode Island. The Company markets household products and personal care products to consumers including a line of skin care products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #119-2023: Government Referral – Wayal Health Sciences USA, Inc.

Wayal Health Sciences USA, Inc., (“Wayal Health” or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company founded in 2016. The Company is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah and markets health and wellness nutritional supplements.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #118-2023: Administrative Closure – Daxen, Inc.

Unicity International, Inc. (“Unicity” or the “Company”) is a multi-level marketing company headquartered in Orem, Utah and founded in 1986. The Company markets nutritional and personal care products and operates in approximately 30 countries, including the United States, Australia, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Colombia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand,...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #117-2023: Administrative Closure – Unicity International, Inc.

Unicity International, Inc. (“Unicity” or the “Company”) is a multi-level marketing company headquartered in Orem, Utah and founded in 1986. The Company markets nutritional and personal care products and operates in approximately 30 countries, including the United States, Australia, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Colombia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #116-2023: Administrative Closure – GelMoment, Inc.

GelMoment, Inc. (“GelMoment” or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company founded in 2014 and based in Montreal, Canada. The Company markets gel nail polish and other beauty products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #115-2023: NGO Inquiry – The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC

The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC is a direct selling company founded in 1970 and based in Collierville, Tennessee. The Company markets fruit and vegetable juice extract supplements. An NGO identified to DSSRC certain earnings and product performance claims disseminated by salesforce members and the Company.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #114-2023: Administrative Closure – Reliv International, Inc.

Reliv International, Inc. is a direct-selling company founded in 1988, and based in Chesterfield, Missouri. The Company markets proprietary nutritional supplements. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of the direct selling marketplace.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #113-2023: Administrative Closure – Vic Beauty, LLC

Vic Beauty, LLC was a direct sales cosmetic and personal care company based in Los Angeles, California. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #112-2023: Compliance Inquiry – Magnetude Jewelry

Magnetude Jewelry (or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company based in Maryland that sells bio-magnetic interchangeable fashion jewelry to consumers. According to the Company’s website, the Company’s independent representatives earn money through commission on product sales or recruiting other salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #111-2023: Administrative Closure – Shaklee Corporation

Shaklee Corporation (“Shaklee” or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company founded in 1956 and based in Pleasanton, CA. The Company markets natural nutritional supplements, beauty products, and household products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #110-2023: Administrative Closure – Prime My Body

Prime My Body LLC (“Prime My Body” or the “Company”) is a direct-selling company based in Carrollton, Texas. The company was founded in 2013 and sells CBD oils and other nutritional products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #109-2023: Administrative Closure – Direct Cellars

Direct Cellars (or “the Company”) was a multilevel marketing company that was founded in 2014 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri that marketed premium wine and spirits.
Read the Decision
Case

Case #108-2023: Administrative Closure – Save the Day Seasonings

Save the Day Seasonings (“the Company”) was a multilevel marketing company founded in 2016 and headquartered in Meridian, Idaho. The Company markets mixed spices and seasonings.
Read the Decision
Case

Case #107-2023: Administrative Closure – BeneYOU LLC (a/k/a Avisae)

BeneYOU LLC (a/k/a Avisae) (“BeneYOU” or the “Company”) is a direct selling company headquartered in Lindon, Utah, that acquired the Avisae brand in 2018. The company markets personal care and wellness products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #106-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Magneceutical Health, LLC

Magneceutical Health, LLC (“Magneceutical Health” or the “Company”) is a company headquartered in Clearwater, FL that markets a medical device called the Magnesphere, which is a magnetic resonance therapy system designed to help reduce the symptoms associated with chronic stress.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #105-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Peach Underneath, Inc.

Peach Underneath, Inc. (“Peach Underneath” or “the Company”) was a multilevel marketing company headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts that marketed premium, athletic-inspired clothing and intimate apparel.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #104-2023: Government Referral – Karatbars International

Karatbars International is a multi-level direct selling company founded in 2011 that markets small gold bars and gift items in gold bullion. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #103-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – Essential Bodywear, LLC

Essential Bodywear, LLC is a direct selling company founded in 2003 and headquartered in Commerce, Michigan. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #102-2023: Compliance Inquiry – Innov8tive Nutrition, Inc.

Innov8tive Nutrition is a direct selling company that was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington.  This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #101-2023: Monitoring Inquiry – NeVetica International, Inc.

NeVetica International, Inc. is a direct selling company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky and founded in 2016. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #100-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Youngevity International, Inc.

Youngevity International, Inc. is a direct selling company that sells health, nutrition, and wellness products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #99-2023: Government Referral – Perfectly Posh, LLC

Perfectly Posh, LLC is a direct selling company based in Salt Lake City, Utah that markets personal care and beauty products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #98-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Ruby Ribbon, Inc.

Ruby Ribbon, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company that markets women’s apparel, handbags, and other accessories. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #97-2022: Administrative Closure – Unicity International, Inc.

Unicity International, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company that markets nutritional and personal care products and operates in approximately 30 countries. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #96-2022: Government Referral – ViSalus, Inc.

ViSalus, Inc. is a multilevel marketing company that markets weight management nutritional products, dietary supplements, and energy drinks. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #95-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – PartyLite Worldwide, LLC

PartyLite Worldwide, LLC is a multi-level marketing company that markets candles, home décor, and home fragrance products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #94-2022: Administrative Closure – Tealightful Treasures, Inc.

Tealightful Treasures, Inc. is a retail company with a direct-to-consumer website that markets several varieties of loose-leaf tea products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #93-2022: Administrative Closure – Ardyss International, LLC

Ardyss International LLC is a multi-level marketing company that markets reshaping apparel, nutrition, personal care, and home care products.This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #92-2022: Administrative Closure – Sunrider International

Sunrider International is a multi-level marketing company that markets herbal food and beverages, nutritional supplements, and skin care and personal care products.This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #91-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Kannaway, LLC

Kannaway, LLC is a direct selling company headquartered in Poway, CA that sells CBD and wellness products to consumers. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #90-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Zilis LLC

Zilis LLC is a multi-level direct-selling company headquartered in Argyle, Texas that sells wellness products to consumers. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #89-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – My Lala Leggings, Inc.

My Lala Leggings, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company headquartered in Palmdale, CA that sells women’s clothing, specializing in leggings. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #88-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – B-Epic Worldwide, LLC

B-Epic Worldwide, LLC is a multi-level direct-selling company located in Layton, Utah that markets health, detox, and fitness products. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #87-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – MWR Life, LLC

MWR Life, LLC is a multi-level direct selling company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida that offers discounts on travel services such as flights, hotels, resorts, cruises, vacation rentals, car rentals, excursions, theme parks, and trains. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #86-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Visi

Visi is a direct-selling company headquartered in Pleasant Grove, Utah specializing in a variety of health-related products, including protein, essential oils, and extracts. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring process, which monitors advertising and marketing claims made in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #85-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Reliv International, Inc.

Reliv International, Inc. is a multilevel direct-selling company located in Chesterfield, Missouri that markets and distributes nutritional supplements and personal care products. This...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #84-2022: Monitoring Inquiry – Navan Global

Navan Global was a multilevel marketing company located in Franklin, Tennessee, manufacturing and distributing health and CBD-related products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #83-2022: Government Referral – Root Wellness LLC, a/k/a Root Brands

Root Wellness LLC is a direct-selling company founded in 2019 and located in Brentwood, Tennessee. The Company markets health and wellness products, most notably its Clean Slate, Restore, and Zero-In products. In February 2021, DSSRC initiated an inquiry regarding the dissemination of health-related claims by Root Wellness and its salesforce members and opened a...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #82-2022: Administrative Closure – LurraLife Global

LurraLife Global was a multi-level direct-selling company that marketed health and wellness products, including detoxification tea, to consumers. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #81-2022: Administrative Closure – QuiAri, LLC

QuiAri, LLC is a multi-level direct-selling company in Brandon, Florida, that markets health and wellness products. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #80-2022: Government Referral – Fifth Avenue Collection, Inc.

Fifth Avenue Collection is a multi-level direct-selling company that sells fashion jewelry products headquartered in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan. The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) commenced this inquiry pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #79-2022 – Government Referral – Vyvo, Inc.

Vyvo, Inc. is a multi-level direct selling company that markets a smart watch, DNA and genetics testing, and nutritional supplements. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace and concerns earnings claims disseminated by the Company and its salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #78-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – H20 At Home

H2O At Home is a multilevel marketing company headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania that offers consumers a line of non-toxic cleaning solutions. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #77-2022 – Compliance Inquiry – Root Wellness LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) opened a compliance inquiry against Root Wellness after health-related product claims similar to those addressed in a 2021 inquiry appeared in the social media posts of Root Wellness salesforce members. In addition, during its inquiry DSSRC identified more than 30 other related issues. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #76-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Sanki Global LLC

This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Sanki Global LLC is a multi-level direct selling company headquartered in Japan, with U.S. offices located in Henderson, Nevada.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #75-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Tranont

This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Tranont is a multi-level direct selling company based in Utah. Founded in 2013, the Company sells health and wellness products, including a line of CBD products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #74-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Opulence Global

Opulence Global is a multi-level direct selling company that sells skincare, personal care, and health & wellness products. This inquiry concerns product and earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members on social media regarding the Fountain of Life product, an antioxidant that includes a Picea Abies extract as one of its primary...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #73-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Financial Education Services

Financial Education Services is a multi-level direct selling company that markets credit repair services to consumers. This inquiry concerns earnings claims disseminated by company salesforce members on social media.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #72-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Stella & DOT, LLC

Stella & DOT, LLC is a multi-level direct selling company that sells jewelry, bags, accessories, and women’s clothing. The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) began this inquiry pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. This inquiry concerns earnings claims disseminated by Stella & DOT and its...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #71-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Lifebrook, LLC

Lifebrook was a multilevel marketing company headquartered in Vermillion, South Dakota that sells juices, supplements, and other products containing Aronia. The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) began this inquiry pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #70-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – My Lala Leggings, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #69-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Max International, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #68-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Daxen, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #67-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – WorldVentures Marketing, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #66-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Tastefully Simple

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #65-2022 – Government Referral – FutureNet, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #64-2022 – Compliance Report – Young Living Essential Oils, LLC

Young Living Essential Oils, LLC (“Young Living” or the “Company”) is a global multi-level direct selling company that sells essential oils and other personal care and wellness products.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #63-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Innov8tive Nutrition

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #62-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – MWC Living, LLC d/b/a BE (Better Experience)

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs and commenced this inquiry pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #61-2022 – Compliance Report – Mary Kay, Inc.

Mary Kay, Inc.’s (“Mary Kay” or the “Company) business model is that of a direct sales company, which means Mary Kay products are sold by Mary Kay independent sales force members, person to person, away from fixed retail locations. The Company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Mary Kay was founded in 1963 and has an estimated three million independent beauty consultants selling Mary Kay®...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #60-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Morinda, Inc., Corporation

Morinda, Inc. is a multi-level direct-selling company that markets a noni juice blend (Tahitian Noni) and various dietary supplements, personal care products, and essential oils. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #59-2022 – Government Referral – BE Rules, a/k/a BE Factor, f/k/a Melius

BE Rules, a/k/a BE Factor, f/k/a Melius (“BE” or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company that markets forex and cryptocurrency trading package subscriptions. BE Rules is based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates and also maintains offices in India and the United Kingdom.[1] The Company maintains a Facebook page[2], an Instagram page[3], a company...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #58-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Surge365

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #57-2022 – Compliance Report – Le-Vel Brands, LLC

Le-Vel Brands, LLC (“Le-Vel” or the “Company) is a multi-level direct selling company headquartered in Frisco, Texas that was founded in 2012. The Company sells health and wellness products including dietary supplements containing vitamins, minerals, plant extracts, antioxidants, enzymes, probiotics, and amino acids.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #56-2022 – Monitoring Inquiry – Immunotec

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.
Read the Decision
Case

Case #55-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – Wildtree, Inc.

Wildtree, Inc. is a spice and seasoning company headquartered in Lincoln, Rhode Island that specializes in healthy meal solutions for families. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #54-2021: Government Referral – Dot Dot Smile

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #53-2021: Monitoring Inquiry – Jeunesse Global

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) opened a monitoring inquiry with Jeunesse Global over concerns about earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members for the company. DSSRC appreciated Jeunesse’s good faith actions to remove the challenged claims on social media sites, but DSSRC recommended Jeunesse continue its communication with salesforce members to ensure that...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #52-2021: Monitoring Inquiry – Daxen, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #51-2021: Compliance Report – dōTERRA International, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. In 2019, DSSRC commenced an inquiry regarding several core health-related and income claims being disseminated on the social media pages of certain distributors of dōTERRA. More specifically, the inquiry included both...

Read the Decision
Case

Case #50-2021: Monitoring Inquiry – Chalk Couture

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #49-2021: Monitoring Inquiry – Lifebrook, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #48-2021: Government Referral – Q Sciences

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #47-2021: –Monitoring Inquiry– Root Wellness, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. 

Read the Decision
Case

Case #46-2021: –Monitoring Inquiry– SwissJust USA

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #45-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – Globallee, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read the Decision
Case

Case #44-2021 – Government Referral – ByDzyne

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self- regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.
Read more
Case

Case #43-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – Limbic Arc, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #42-2021 –Monitoring Inquiry– Max International, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.
Read more
Case

Case #41-2021 – Government Referral – Alliance in Motion Global, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. 

Read more
Case

Case #40-2021 – NGO Inquiry –Mary Kay, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. Pursuant to section D(II) of DSSRC’s Policies & Procedures, DSSRC may commence an inquiry regarding the marketing disseminated by a direct selling company and/or its salesforce where the subject claims were referred to DSSRC by the Administrator of the...
Read more
Case

Case #39-2021: –Monitoring Inquiry– Enagic, USA, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. 

Read more
Case

Case #38-2021: –Monitoring Inquiry– Zinzino, LLC.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. 

Read more
Case

Case #37-2021: –Monitoring Inquiry– Aihu, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. 

Read more
Case

Case #36-2021: – Government Referral – Bulavita

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self- regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #35-2021: – Government Referral – UWell Life, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #34-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – via ONEHOPE Wine

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #33-2021: – Government Referral – RBC Life Sciences, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.
Read more
Case

Case #32-2021 – Monitoring Inquiry – Magnetude Jewelry

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #31-2021 -NGO Inquiry- Primerica, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc.  Pursuant to section D(II) of DSSRC’s Policies & Procedures, DSSRC may commence an inquiry regarding marketing materials disseminated by a direct selling company and/or its salesforce where the subject claims were referred to DSSRC by the...
Read more
Case

Case #30-2020 -Government Referral- Gano Excel USA, Inc.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #29-2020 -Governmental Referral- Flavon USA, LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

Read more
Case

Case #28-2020 -Government Referral- Fortress Network LLC

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC...
Read more
Case

Case #27-2020 - Monitoring Inquiry - LurraLife, LLC

DSSRC's inquiries are a result of ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Here DSSRC challenged earnings and product advertising claims made by LurraLife, LLC and the salesforce for the multi-level direct selling company that provides nutritional, tea, and coffee products.

Read the Case
Case

Case #26-2020 -NGO Inquiry- Counter Brands LLC d/b/a/ Beautycounter

DSSRC's inquiries cover the marketing disseminated by a direct selling company and/or its salesforce. Here, a nonprofit, non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to protecting consumers identified certain Beautycounter earnings claims being disseminated on social media and on the Beautycounter website. The NGO’s initial written submission to DSSRC...

Read more
Case

Case #25-2020 -NGO Inquiry- International Markets Live, Inc.

DSSRC's inquiries are in regards to the marketing disseminated by a direct selling company and/or its salesforce. Here, a nonprofit NGO brought to DSSRC’s attention certain...

Read more
Case

Case #24-2020 -NGO Inquiry- Le-Vel Brands LLC

DSSRC's inquiries are in regards to the marketing disseminated by a direct selling company and/or its salesforce where the subject claims. Here, a nonprofit NGO dedicated to protecting consumers...
Read more
Case

Case #23-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Fifth Avenue Collection, Inc.

DSSRC's inquiries are in regards to advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry including claims made by salesforce members on social media. This case is about Fifth Avenue...
Read more
Case

Case #22-2020 -Competitor Challenge- BioReigns

This DSSRC inquiry was commenced by MyDailyChoice pursuant to the competitor challenge provisions articulated in section D (III) of the DSSRC Policies & Procedures. Founded in 2018,...
Read more
Case

Case #21-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- R&D Global d/b/a B-Epic

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the...

Read more
Case

Case #20-2020 -Compliance- Pure Romance, LLC

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”), a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc, commenced a review pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct...

Read more
Case

Case #19-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Initial Outfitters, Inc.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Through its monitoring of the direct...

Read More
Case

Case #18-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Tranont

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling...

Read More
Case

Case #17-2020 -NGO Inquiry- dōTERRA International LLC

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced pursuant section D(ii) of the DSSRC Policies & Procedures.

Specifically,...

Read More
Case

Case #16-2020 -Government Referral Report- New U Life

On December 20, 2019, the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) published a report regarding the inquiry of product performance claims disseminated by New U Life, a multi-level marketing company located in Lehi, UT that offers a variety of health, wellness and weight-loss products including Somaderm which the company describes as “a powerful and innovative transdermal solution for...
Read More
Case

Case #15-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Global Domains International

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in...

Read More
Case

Case #14-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Paparazzi Accessories, LLC

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the...

Read More
Case

Case #13-2020 -Challenge- Young Living Essential Oils, LLC

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by TINA pursuant to the challenge provisions articulated in the DSSRC Policies & Procedures.

Read More
Case

Case #12-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Aloette Cosmetics

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling...

Read More
Case

Case #11-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Dose of Nature

BASIS OF INQUIRY

Dose of Nature (“Dose of Nature” or the “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company that offers water-soluble CBD and nano CBD products for humans and animals.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising...

Read More
Case

Case #10-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- Magnolia and Vine

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct...

Read More
Case

Case #9-2020 -Monitoring Inquiry- MyDailyChoice, Inc. DBA HempWorx

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. (BBB NP) This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising...

Read More
Case

Case #8-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- New U Life

BASIS OF INQUIRY

New U Life (“NUL” or “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company that was founded in November 2017 and is headquartered in Lehi, UT. NUL offers a variety of health, wellness and weight loss products including Somaderm which has been described as “a powerful, innovative transdermal human growth...

Read More
Case

Case #7-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- It Works!

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising...

Read More
Case

Case #6-2019 -Government Referral Reports- MojiLife, LLC

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the...

Read More
Case

Case #5-2019 -Government Referral Reports- Aloe Veritas, Inc.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing...

Read More
Case

Case #4-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- Pure Romance, LLC

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc., This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing...

Read More
Case

Case #3-2019 -Challenge- Team National, Inc.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by TINA pursuant to the challenge...

Read More
Case

Case #2-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- Southwestern Advantage, Inc.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in...

Read More
Case

Case #1-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- Wildtree, Inc.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct...

Read More
 

 

 

 

Administratively Resolved Inquiry Summaries

 

Case #7-2019 -Monitoring Inquiry- It Works!

BBB NATIONAL PROGRAMS, INC.

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council

 

Case Number: 7 -2019 – Monitoring Inquiry – It Works!

-DOWNLOAD CASE PDF-

 

COMPANY DESCRIPTION

It Works! (“IW” or “Company”) is a multi-level direct selling company founded in 2001 and headquartered in Palmetto FL, that offers a variety of beauty, nutrition, and lifestyle products. According to the Company’s website, IW has 380,000 independent contract distributors in 19 countries and international offices located in Ireland, and South Korea.

BASIS OF INQUIRY

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), is a national advertising self-regulation program administered by BBB National Programs, Inc. This inquiry was commenced by the DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.

More specifically, DSSRC identified several core product performance and earnings claims being disseminated on the Facebook and Instagram pages of IW consultants as well as on the Company website.

The representative product performance claims that were the subject of this review are as follows:

 

1. Product Performance Claims:

  • Before and After photograph of woman’s stomach with claim of 1 Wrap Used and a Time Span of 12 hours.
  • Before and after photo of a woman with copy stating “Keto Coffee + Chocolate Greens” and “Love these results from the coffee and greens.”
  • Before and after photograph of a woman with copy stating “She did this with our ThermoFight now since it has been reformulated, it’s now called ThermoFight X.” and copy stating “It’s been clinically proven to shed 31 lbs in 90 days.”
  • Before and after photograph of a woman with copy stating “It’s a new month and I have 10 new 90-day challenge spots open this weekend! I am looking for anyone who wants to lose 10-50 lbs and/or tighten and tone before summer!!”
  • Before and after photograph of a woman’s midsection with copy stating “Product Used: It Works!! Cleanse™ - Time Span: 48 hours”
  • “2 pills (pill emoji), 30 pounds lost (down arrow emoji), 90 days (surprise face emoji) who wants the deets?”
  • “Previous testers have lost ON AVERAGE 31 pounds in ONLY 90 days 💖 CLINICALLY PROVEN weight loss  you will lose 2.5X MORE weight than just diet and exercise ALONE! This PROD is 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥂”
  • On my way to gym 👌🏽 Nonetheless ✌🏽 💊 to get max results for my people who can’t make it to the gym 💁🏽‍♀️ Get this product now ⤵️”
  • That "crazy wrap thing" you have been hearing about! These are so unbelievable, and YES they really do work!
  • Before and after photo and image of a woman with a tape measure around her waist with copy stating “You can lose inches in just 45 minutes with one application… what are you waiting for?!”
  • “Tightens, Tones and Firms In As Little as 45 Minutes (It Works! Body Wrap)
  • “Reduces the appearance of cellulite” (It Works! Body Wrap)
  • “Gives you a fast & lasting results from a botanically based formula” (It Works! Body Wrap)
  • “Activates thermogenesis to achieve and maintain an ideal fat burn.” (ThermoFight X)
  • “Accelerates ketosis by supporting rapid ketone generation.” (ThermoFight X)
  • “Supports healthy blood sugar levels to reduce sugar cravings.” (ThermoFight X)
  • “Boosts energy.” (ThermoFight X)

            The representative earnings claims that were the subject of this review are as follows:

2. Earnings Claims

  • “Message me and I will show YOU how women/men are earning SIX figure incomes (money emoji) from this crazy business.”
  • “Because of It Works!!, I can buy gas, pay for bills, and in the next three months I'll pay off my student loans! I can support my family of six because we're able to go shopping and do so without fear of my credit cards declining!”
  • “I never thought that working from my home could become a reality, but within two years, my husband and I had both retired, and were a full-time It Works!! Family!.”
  • “Unlimited Income Potential”
  • “No limit to the amount of money that you can earn.”

 

COMPANY’S POSITION

IW explained that its independent distributors play a vital role in all aspects of its business and, accordingly, the Company requires distributors to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and industry principles. IW monitors its distributors to prevent the dissemination of improper claims regarding both its products and the It Works! opportunity.

IW stated that it has a robust compliance program that includes an ongoing review of its distributors’ social media activities and described the process in detail for DSSRC. [1] More specifically, IW noted that it provides its distributors with:  

  • specific policies and procedures that distributors review and agree to upon enrollment that govern their behavior in areas including product claims and testimonials; the use of Before and After photographs, income claims and the income disclosure statement and policy violation reporting[2]
  • a dedicated compliance team consisting of nine individuals that constantly monitor and identify improper or unauthorized claims and actions by It Works! distributors[3]
  • a comprehensive, third-party monitoring program to assist in compliance oversight
  • a strict “Before and After” photo approval process. More specifically, all “Before and After” testimonials must be submitted and approved by the It Works! Compliance team. Once approved, a Compliance Specialist inserts the photographs into a company approved template with appropriate disclaimers before it is released for publication[4]
  • a system whereby other distributors assist the Company in identifying policy violations by submitting a written report of the violation directly to the attention of the It Works!’ Compliance Department
  • ongoing education to distributors through many different means of communication including a comprehensive product Information Sheet; a dedicated Product Coach; website videos directed to compliance issues; weekly newsletters; specific training sessions at annual conferences and events; and
  • the It Works! eSuite system – a virtual administrative back office service that allows distributors to manage their business profiles to a document library including the It Works! Policies and Procedures and compliance instructions/guidelines.

 

I. Claims Made by It Works!

In response to the claims identified by DSSRC, the Company contended that DSSRC extracted the testimonials from its website in an incomplete format and disagreed with DSSRC’s concerns that the testimonials on the Company website are inappropriately presented to consumers. The Company noted that below each testimonial is the IW disclaimer stating that “Earnings of participants in the Compensation Plan may vary. Please see the It Works!! Annual Disclosure Statement.” Directly below the disclaimer is a link to the IW Annual Disclosure Statement which the Company maintained clearly sets forth the average earnings of active distributors. IW explained that its Annual Disclosure Statement is provided as a footer link that is easy to identify on every page of its website.

1. Earnings Claims

  • “Unlimited Income Potential” and “No limit to the amount of money that you can earn.”

IW informed DSSRC that these two claims inadvertently appeared on the Company website and were immediately removed after they were brought to IW’s attention by DSSRC.

  • “I never thought that working from my home could become a reality, but within two years, my husband and I had both retired, and were a full-time It Works! Family!”
  • "Because of It Works!!, I can buy gas, pay for bills, and in the next three months I'll pay off my student loans! I can support my family of six because we're able to go shopping and do so without fear of my credit cards declining!”

 

Case 7-2019 Image 1

 

These claims appeared as part of rotating consumer testimonials on the IW website. IW indicated to DSSRC that it was in the process of modifying the claims to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure in close proximity to the claims that will provide annual income information that can be reasonably expected by program participants.

 

2. Product Performance Claims

On the IW website the Company also made several specific performance claims for ThermoFight X.

  • Activate Thermogenesis to achieve and maintain an ideal fat burn

    IW stated that there are multiple complementary mechanisms of action of the key ThermoFight X ingredient compounds [caffeine as a sympato-adrenal innervator (catecholamines), caffeine as PDE-4/adenosine inhibitor, and EGCG as COMT inhibitor], that helps tip the metabolic balance within adipocytes from lipogenesis (triglyceride formation and fat accumulation) to lipolysis (fatty acid liberation and fat catabolism). IW maintained that increased lipolysis has scientifically established metabolic outcomes of increased thermogenesis, ketogenesis, and fatty acid oxidation that leads to cellular energy. 

  •  Accelerates ketosis by supporting rapid ketone production. Boosts energy.

    According to IW, caffeine intake can stimulate ketone production in the liver in a dose dependent manner by increasing plasma ketone Beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations. The Company stated that increasing plasma ketone levels with doses of caffeine can transiently contribute to brain energy needs when glucose levels drop in the brain. IW further explained that caffeine, as a lipolytic agent, increases plasma free fatty acid levels liberated from adipocytes. The free fatty acids entering the liver are beta oxidized and converted into ketones due to condensation pairs of acetyl-CoA units as their availability exceeds their utilization by the tricarboxlic acid cycle.[5]

  • Supports healthy blood sugar levels to reduce cravings

    It was the Company’s position that chlorogenic acid (CGA), as in the green coffee extract in ThermoFight X, has been shown to have anti-hyperglycemic effects in animals and humans. The Company referenced studies which examined CGA’s effect on postprandial blood glucose concentration. According to IW, CGA strongly inhibits the activities of alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase, sugar and starch digesting enzymes. IW further stated that CGA has also been shown to have an antagonistic effect on glucose transport in the intestines. In addition, it maintained that CGA inhibits approximately 40% of the glucose-6 phosphatase (G-6-Pase) in hepatocytes. IW contended that this helps prevent catchcholamine-induced glucose conversion ( e.g. from exercise, fasting, low blood glucose and stress) from dumping glucose into the bloodstream from stored glycerin in the liver. [6]

 

II. Claims Made by It Works! Distributors 

1. Product Performance Claims

  • Before and After photograph of woman;  Products Used: 1 Wrap Used;  Time Span of 12 hours.

 

Case 7-2019 Image 2

 

IW stated that the Before and After photos contained in this social media post by the IW distributor were properly submitted, reviewed and approved by an IW Compliance Specialist and placed on Company approved template with the appropriate disclosures. According to IW, the testimonial at issue was reviewed and deemed to be compliant with the results that the average individual would generally expect to achieve from the use of this IW product for the time span noted.

  • Before and after photo; “Keto Coffee + Chocolate Greens” and “Love these results from the coffee and greens.”
  • Before and after photograph of a woman; “She did this with our ThermoFight now since it has been reformulated, it’s now called ThermoFight X.” and “It’s been clinically proven to shed 31 lbs in 90 days.”
  • “2 pills (pill emoji), 30 pounds lost (down arrow emoji), 90 days (surprise face emoji) who wants the deets?”
  • On my way to gym 👌🏽 Nonetheless 🏽 💊 to get max results for my people who can’t make it to the gym 💁🏽‍♀️ Get this product now ️” and
  • “Previous testers have lost ON AVERAGE 31 pounds in ONLY 90 days 💖 CLINICALLY PROVEN weight loss  you will lose 2.5X MORE weight than just diet and exercise ALONE! This PROD is 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥂

The above five posts were disseminated by one IW distributor. IW maintained that it does not have a record that the distributors’ posts were approved by the Compliance Department and informed DSSRC that it has reached out to the distributor to ensure that she is aware the Company protocol that must be followed for the dissemination of such photographs.

Subsequently, IW informed DSSRC that these Facebook posts referenced by DSSRC were deleted.

  • Before and after photograph of a woman; “It’s a new month and I have 10 new 90-day challenge spots open this weekend! I am looking for anyone who wants to lose 10-50 lbs and/or tighten and tone before summer!!”

    IW explained that its Compliance team had previously reached out to the distributor regarding the post that was identified by DSSRC and requested that the post be removed. The distributor failed to respond. Consequently, the distributors account was terminated in October 2018.

  • Before and after photograph of a woman’s midsection “Product Used: It Works!! Cleanse™ - Time Span: 48 hours”

    IW informed DSSRC that the before and after photographs featured in this social media post were properly submitted reviewed and approved by the IW Compliance Specialist and placed on the Company approved template with the appropriate disclaimers. According to IW, this testimonial was reviewed and deemed compliant with the expectations that the average individual would achieve from the use of this IW product for the time span noted.

  • “That ‘crazy wrap thing’ you have been hearing about! These are so unbelievable, and YES they really do work! “
  • Before and after photo and image of a woman with a tape measure around her waist stating “You can lose inches in just 45 minutes with one application… what are you waiting for?!”
  • “Tightens, Tones and Firms In As Little as 45 Minutes (It Works! Body Wrap)
  • “Reduces the appearance of cellulite” (It Works! Body Wrap)
  • “Gives you a fast & lasting results from a botanically based formula” (It Works! Body Wrap);

The above claims were disseminated by one IW distributor in one post. IW informed DSSRC that it the Company initiated a compliance proceeding against this distributor and that, consequently, the post has been removed.

ThermoFight X

As support for the efficacy claims regarding ThermoFight X, IW provided DSSRC with studies on the product’s primary ingredient as well as a confidential product overview which summarized the product’s mechanism of action, lipolysis activation, and the complementary action of the product’s green tea extract ingredient and caffeine ingredients. The overview also provided information on how the product contributes to ketosis, inhibits glycogenolsis and regulates blood glucose levels.

IW addressed each individual claim for ThermoFight X that were brought to its attention by DSSRC.

  • “Previous testers have lost ON AVERAGE 31 pounds in ONLY 90 days 💖 CLINICALLY PROVEN weight loss  you will lose 2.5X MORE weight than just diet and exercise ALONE! This PROD is 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥂

As support, the Company provided an in-vivo clinical study (“the Dulloo study”) of overweight men and women, ages 25-60, taking a daily dose of 300mg of the Green Select Phytosome green tea extract found in ThermoFight X, along with a calorie induced diet.[7] According to the study results, subjects lost an average of 31 pounds over a 90-day period as compared to only 11 pounds in the reduced-calorie diet control group. IW explained that ThermoFight X is formulated to provide the daily clinically-studied dose of GreenSelect Phytosome green tea extract.

The Company also informed DSSRC that in addition to Green Select Phytosome, ThermoFight X was further enhanced with additional green tea extract to satisfy the Health Canada Green Tea monograph to be approved for Natural Health Product (NHP) product license weight management claims.

Use of Before and After Photographs

The Company explained that its compliance process for the use of before and after photos is set up so that every before and after photo is reviewed by a trained Compliance Specialist and approved only if it meets the expectations of an average individual using the product or a combination of products for the time span indicated.

IW argued that DSSRC reviewed the disclosure language that accompanied the Before and After photos out of context by pulling one sentence (“*Earnings of participants in the Compensation Plan may vary. Please see the It Works! Annual Income Disclosure Statement”) out of a disclaimer that was intended to be read in its entirety.

IW provided DSSRC with the parameters/criteria that is set by its Director of Compliance and applied by its Compliance Specialists for the approval of its before and after testimonials. The Company stated that upon submission of before and after photos, IW distributors are required to provide the dates that the photos were taken, identification of the products used and whether the distributor incorporated diet and exercise.

IW also noted that the before and after photographs identified by DSSRC were more than two years old and on a template that is no longer used by the Company. IW stated that that its before and after template is actively reviewed and revised by its Compliance Department as needed to increase compliance and that template was last evaluated in 2018.

With respect to the duration of the depicted results that may be expected by consumers, the Company stated that cosmetics, by definition, only change superficial appearance and results are always temporary. IW provided the disclaimer that it uses for cosmetic testimonials which states that “Results are not permanent. The success of this individual is not necessarily indicative of other success.” Conversely, the Company noted that, the results of dietary supplements could be temporary or permanent depending on the individual and any additional underlying lifestyle changes that are made. It Works! contended that its disclosure for all dietary supplement testimonials states “The success of this individual is not necessarily indicative of other success. Results may be affected by a variety of factors, such as starting weight, body type, exercise and diet.” The Company called DSSRC’s attention to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Voluntary Guidelines for Providers of Weight Loss Products or Services which it maintained makes clear that the guidelines are not the law but voluntary standards. It Works! asserted that its approved before and after pictures contain representations of how long the effects of the product(s) last which is reflected in time span indicated in the Distributors’ post.

IW revised its disclosure template by increasing the font and contrast and making the disclosure more prominent.

  1. Earnings Claim
  • “Message me and I will show YOU how women/men are earing SIX figure incomes (money emoji) from this crazy business.”

 

Case 7-2019 Image 3

 

IW advised DSSRC that it previously reached out to the distributor regarding the post that was identified by DSSRC and indicated that the distributor’s account was terminated for other reasons in November 2017.

In response to DSSRC’s concerns regarding income representations and the location of an earnings disclaimer and the link to the It Works! Income Disclosure Statement, the Company explained that it added a disclosure asterisk at the end of all earnings claims and incorporated a link to its Income Disclosure Statement within the disclaimer alleviating the need to scroll further to access the document which states: “Earnings of participants in the Compensation Plan may vary. Please see the It Works! Annual Income Disclosure Statement.

 

ANALYSIS

The DSSRC confirmed that the Company had already voluntarily taken action to address a number of the social media posts at issue before this inquiry was commenced. In addition, during the pendency of the inquiry and in the spirit of self-regulation, the Company had several of the social media posts from IW distributors that were identified by DSSRC in its opening letter taken down.

Accordingly, DSSRC reviewed the remaining express and implied income claims that were communicated in the form of testimonials from IW distributors and on the Company website and also evaluated the truth and accuracy of the remaining product performance claims.

1. Earnings Claims

The Company provided DSSRC with a copy of its comprehensive compliance policy and distributor training procedures with respect to the dissemination of earnings claims communicated by IW distributors. IW also advised DSSRC that it works with a reputable third-party vendor to monitor the social media claims made by the Company’s distributors.

The Company informed DSSRC that the earnings claims at issue have either been completely removed or would be significantly modified to disclose the amount of income that could be generally expected by IW distributors.

It is a long-standing principle of advertising that an advertiser has the burden to support all reasonable interpretations of its claims and not simply the messages it intended to convey. Verizon Communications, Inc. (Verizon Wireless Services (“ First to 5G”), Report #6258, NAD/CARU Case Reports (May 2019). Further, in the direct selling context, the DSSRC has made clear that the responsibility of the direct selling company extends to the claims disseminated by members of a direct selling company’s salesforce.[8]

With respect to the use of testimonials from IW distributors communicating earnings results that may not be consistent with the expectations of typical consumers or recruits, DSSRC noted that the guidance provided by the FTC Guides was particularly relevant. More specifically, the FTC Guides state that:

An advertisement containing an endorsement relating the experience of one or more consumers on a central or key attribute of the product or service also will likely be interpreted as representing that the endorser’s experience is representative of what consumers will generally achieve with the advertised product or service in actual, albeit variable, conditions of use. Therefore, an advertiser should possess and rely upon adequate substantiation for this representation. If the advertiser does not have substantiation that the endorser’s experience is representative of what consumers will generally achieve, the advertisement should clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected performance in the depicted circumstances, and the advertiser must possess and rely on adequate substantiation for that representation. 16 CFR § 255.2(b). (emphasis added).

While DSSRC appreciated the commitment of IW to provide a hyperlink to the Company’s Income Disclosure Statement when an atypical earnings claim is communicated by the Company or its sales force, DSSRC remained concerned that the use of a hyperlink alone would not satisfy its burden to disclose the amount of income that could be generally expected by IW distributors.

As stated in the FTC Dot.com Disclosure Guide:

Disclosures that are an integral part of a claim or inseparable from it should not be communicated through a hyperlink. Instead, they should be placed on the same page and immediately next to the claim and be sufficiently prominent so that the claim and the disclosure are read at the same time, without referring the consumer somewhere else to obtain this important information. [9] (emphasis added)

Accordingly, as it pertains to It Works future modifications of atypical earnings claims, DSSRC concluded that in the absence of a clear and conspicuous disclosure indicating the amount of earnings that may be generally expected by consumers or incoming recruits, the presentation of a hyperlink to an income disclosure statement, by itself, will not be sufficient to satisfy the the Company’s disclosure obligations.

  • “Message me and I will show YOU how women/men are earing SIX figure incomes (money emoji) from this crazy business.”

    IW informed DSSRC that it reached out to the former distributor who disseminated this claim on Facebook and requested that the distributor remove the claim.

    DSSRC confirmed that this claim has been removed, an action that was deemed necessary and appropriate. More specifically, the Company provided DSSRC with information indicating that the average annual income earned by IW distributors in 2016 was $612. [10] As such, DSSRC determined that this claim, in the unqualified context in which it was presented, could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning that earning a six figure income could be typically expected by IW distributors. Such message is not supported by IW distributor income data.

     DSSRC appreciates the prompt action taken by IW to remove this claim and its ongoing commitment to monitor the income claims communicated by its sales force. 

  • “Because of It Works!!, I can buy gas, pay for bills, and in the next three months I'll pay off my student loans! I can support my family of six because we're able to go shopping and do so without fear of my credit cards declining!”

     This claim was presented as a unqualified testimonial claim on the IW website. Although this testimonial may, in fact be authentic, DSSRC concluded that in the context of the online advertising, the representation could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning that IW distributors typically earn a significant monthly income. However, according to the IW 2016 Annual Disclosure Statement, the average IW distributor earns $51 per month.[11] It would be highly unlikely that a monthly income of $51 would provide enough money to buy gas, pay for bills, pay off student loans and support a family of six or allow an IW distributor to pay off its student loans..

     Accordingly, DSSRC determined that the testimonial communicated an unqualified, atypical earnings claim and deemed the voluntary action taken by IW to remove the claim to be necessary and appropriate. 

  • “I never thought that working from my home could become a reality, but within two years, my husband and I had both retired, and were a full-time It Works!! Family!.” 

    Similarly, this claim was also presented as an unqualified testimonial claim on the IW website. The Company informed DSSRC that this claim would not be presented in the same context in the future on the IW website. DSSRC again concluded that removal and/or modification of the claim was necessary and appropriate. 

    The use of unqualified claims that imply receiving “career-level income have been cautioned against by the FTC. Specifically, section thirteen (13) of the FTC’s Business Guidance Concerning Multi-Level Marketing (“FTC Business Guidance”), states that unless it can be demonstrated that direct selling participants can generally achieve such results, companies (and/or their representatives) should not “represent through words or images that participants can earn thousands of dollars a month, quit their jobs, “fire their bosses”.[12]  Accordingly, DSSRC concluded that the assertion that IW distributors can retire from their current job and replace that income as a “full-time” IW distributor is a scenario that is both atypical and not supported by the income data provided by the Company. 

    DSSRC expressed its appreciation to IW for its voluntary commitment to remove the claim in the context in which it is presented to consumers. 

  • “Unlimited Income Potential” and “No limit to the amount of money that you can earn.” 

    The two above claims suggesting that IW distributors can earn unlimited income appeared as stand-alone claims on the IW website. The Company agreed with DSSRC that unlimited income claims were not an accurate characterization of the amount of money that IW distributors could earn and removed the claims immediately after such claims were brought to the Company’s attention.

2. Product Performance Claims

The product performance claims at issue in this inquiry were communicated both on IW’s official website and on social media by IW distributors. The specific products that were the subject of the DSSRC review included: ThermoFight X, It Works! Cleanse, the It Works! Body Wrap, It Works! Super Greens and It Works! Keto Coffee.

  • It Works! Super Greens and It Works! Keto Coffee

    DSSRC reviewed a social media post that included a before and after photograph of an IW distributor that depicted efficacy results of a combined usage of It Works! Keto Coffee and It Works! Super Greens.

    DSSRC expressed concern that the before and after depiction, which showed a woman’s considerable weight loss, did not disclose material information regarding the implied weight loss including the time span in which such results occurred; whether some of the weight loss was attributable to diet and exercise, and whether such results could be reasonably expected by the typical user of two the products.

    IW informed DSSRC that it had no record that such a post was approved by the IW compliance department and requested that the distributor to remove the post. DSSRC confirmed that post was taken down and expressed its gratitude to IW for its prompt attention to the matter.

  • It Works! Cleanse

    A side-by-side, before and after depiction of results using a It Works! Cleanse was accompanied by prominent language indicating that the results occurred over a time span of 48-hours. 

    Generally, product cleanses focus on eliminating unhealthy or highly allergenic foods while replacing them with nutrient-dense, whole foods to support overall health. Weight loss is a common and ancillary goal of cleanse dieting, but there is no standard definition of what a weight loss cleanse is or what it should include.[13]

    DSSRC agreed with IW that the before and after comparison did not depict dramatic or significant weight loss and that the minimal results portrayed in the comparison would be consistent with the peripheral weight loss that would be generally expected from most cleansing regimens. DSSRC also noted that the It Works! product information sheet for the Cleanse does not position It Works! Cleanse as a “weight loss” product but, instead, describes the product as “a wellness cleanse that uses plant-based nutrients to reboot digestive health and help maintain a healthy gut.”[14]

    Accordingly, DSSRC concluded that the distributor post did not communicate atypical product results. DSSRC also concluded that it would not be generally expected by consumers that losing weight as a result of using It Works! Cleanse was a core message that was communicated by IW and its distributors. Notwithstanding this determination, DSSRC noted that this claim was removed from social media and is no longer being disseminated.

  • It Works! Body Wrap

    DSSRC evaluated the appropriateness of two Facebook posts for the It Works! Body Wrap that were disseminated by Company Distributors.

    The first post featured a before-and-after comparison of the IW distributor depicting the results from using the It Works! Body Wrap and was accompanied by bold text indicating “Time Span: 12 hours”

    Although the post was removed during the inquiry, IW explained to DSSRC that the photo depiction reviewed and approved by the IW compliance team which deemed the depiction representative of the results that the average individual would achieve from the use of this IW product.

    In its review of this post, DSSRC was mindful of the FTC’s guidance regarding seven common weight-loss claims made for products available over-the-counter, including nonprescription drugs, dietary supplements, creams, wraps, devices, and patches that it deemed “scientifically infeasible”.[15] More specifically, the FTC cautioned media outlets to think twice before running any advertisement that says wearing a product on the body or rubbing it into the skin causes substantial weight loss.[16]

    DSSRC agreed with IW that the Facebook post was not inappropriate as the before-and-after photo depicted very modest results and did not communicate to consumers that use of the It Works! Body Wrap for 12 hours would cause the type of “substantial weight loss” contemplated by the Commission. There is scant evidence showing that body wraps can help users lose weight. Although manufacturers of some body wraps claim that you lose weight by increasing your core body temperature, the weight lost is essentially water weight from sweating while using the product. Here, IW does not position the It Works! Body Wrap as a weight loss product and states only on the It Works! Body Wrap product page that the product will tighten, tone and firm the area of the body on which it is applied after 45 minutes.[17]

    While DSSRC appreciated that IW voluntarily removed the post and agreed that the Facebook post did not communicate weight loss results that would not be generally expected by consumers, it also noted that the It Works! Body Wrap is actually a two-component system that includes the It Works! Body Applicator and the It Works! Fab Wrap. Although the two products are to be used in conjunction, they are offered separately by IW and also priced separately. Accordingly, DSSRC determined that because the depicted results occurred from the use of two component products, this information is material to consumers in contemplation of purchasing the product and should be disclosed in any future advertising and social media posts disseminated by IW distributors.[18]

    In addition, results from using the It Works! Body Wrap for forty-five (45) minutes are temporary and, unless otherwise disclosed, DSSRC concluded that a reasonable consumer may take away the message that the results depicted are long-term and possibly permanent when that is not in fact the case. As such, DSSRC recommended that IW distributors should disclose that the generally expected results from the It Works! Body Wrap are temporary and the depicted results are not long-term or permanent.

    The second Facebook Post for the It Works! Body Wrap included a picture of woman with a tape measure around her waist and referred to the “unbelievable results” that can be achieved using the It Works! Body Wrap and how users can “…lose inches in just 45 minutes with one application.” The post also includes claims that the product “Reduces the appearance of cellulite” and “Gives you a fast & lasting results from a botanically based formula.”

    After DSSRC initiated this inquiry, IW took action to have the post removed immediately and explained that the post had not been approved by the Company’s Compliance Specialist. DSSRC determined that such action was necessary and appropriate based upon the express message that the results are “long lasting” and the implied messages communicated by the post that weight loss and losing inches off the waist are results that may be generally expected by users of the product. However, there was no such evidence in the case record to support such a message and DSSRC was advised by IW that it specifically instructs its distributors that they are not authorized to communicate any claims suggesting that the use of the It Works! Body Wrap will result in weight loss or inches lost off the waist.

    Lastly, as noted earlier in this section of the decision, DSSRC recommended that any future IW advertising for its Body Wrap (i.e., including social media posts by IW distributors) should disclose that the generally expected results from the It Works! Body Wrap are temporary and that consumers should not construe the depicted results as being long-term or permanent.

  • ThermoFight X

    DSSRC reviewed several social media posts made by IW distributors for ThermoFightX, the Company’s weight loss supplement, as well as the description of the product on the IW website. All of these claims included some iteration of the establishment claim that ThermoFight X contains a clinically proven weight-loss ingredient that has been shown to result in an average of 31 pounds lost over 90 days.

    As support for this core establishment claim, IW provided DSSRC with a copy of the 2009 Dulloo study which was conducted on, GreenSelect Phytosome, the green tea extract that is the primary ingredient in ThermoFight X. [19] The Dulloo study was conducted on one hundred (100) subjects of both genders on a hypocaloric diet. Fifty (50) subjects were assigned to the green tea extract plus hypocaloric diet while the other fifty subjects followed only the hypocaloric diet.[20] Body weight was measured on subjects after forty-five (45) and ninety (90) days of treatment. After ninety (90) days of treatment, the statistically significant results indicated appreciable weight loss of 31 lbs. and a decreased body mass index in the GreenSelect Phytosome group as compared to eleven (11) lbs. in the diet only group. Besides the effect on weight and body mass index, several biochemical parameters were also positively impacted including LDL, HDL and total cholesterol and triglycerides.

    Claims that represent that there is scientific evidence that proves or establishes the truth of the advertiser’s claims, are establishment claims. DSSRC, like other BBB NP advertising self-regulation programs, require that, where an advertiser makes an establishment claim, it must offer reliable and well controlled clinical testing on that product that can be readily verified to substantiate an establishment claim for a product.[21]

    Although the FTC often requires two reliable and competent studies to support an establishment claim, the advertising self-regulatory forums do not rigidly require a specific number of tests to support establishment claims and, rather, focus their analyses on the quality, consumer relevance, and reliability of the of the scientific study offered in support of an advertiser’s “clinically proven” establishment claim.[22]

    In its evaluation of the study protocol, DSSRC acknowledged that the study was well controlled and of sufficient duration to provide clinically relevant results.  In addition, the Dulloo study was published in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.[23] DSSRC also confirmed that the dosage of GreenSelect that was administrated in the study was appropriate and consistent with Thermofight X usage instructions and that the weight loss results were statistically significant (p<0.001) after ninety-days.

    Having concluded that the IW study was satisfactorily conducted and produced reliable, statistically significant results, DSSRC turned its attention to the context in which the establishment claims were presented in the advertising and whether the company and its distributors appropriately characterized the study data.

    “She did this with our ThermoFight now since it has been reformulated, it’s now called ThermoFight X.” and “It’s been clinically proven to shed 31 lbs in 90 days.”

    These two claims accompanied a before and after photograph on a distributor’s Facebook post that has since been discontinued. However, because IW informed DSSRC that it intended to continue various iterations of the core claim that use of ThermoFight X has been “clinically proven to shed 31 bs in 90 days,” DSSRC evaluated the Company’s support for this core establishment claim.

    Although DSSRC agreed that the results of the clinical testing on ThermoFight X did demonstrate an average weight loss at the end of 90 days of approximately 31 pounds, at least some of the weight loss was attributable to exercise and the low calorie diet to which test subjects adhered to.[24] Exercise and diet are material factors in a consumer’s full understanding of the product performance claim.

According to the FTC, a claim may be considered inaccurate if it contains a statement – or omits information - that is “material,” or important to a consumer’s decision to buy or use the product.[25] As further noted by the Commission, the FTC looks at what the ad does not say. The failure to include material information leaves consumers with a misimpression about the product.[26] DSSRC also determined that the specific quantified context in which claim was presented (e.g., “lose 31 pounds in 90 days”) would, in the absence of any qualifying information indicating otherwise, contribute to implied product performance message that the weight loss was entirely attributable to the ingredients in ThermoFight X, when that was not in fact the case. With respect to the Company’s future disclosure of material information regarding the study, DSSRC reinforced the general advertising principle that the information should be presented clearly and conspicuously so that consumers can actually notice and understand it.

Regarding the product reformulation, DSSRC noted that IW confirmed that chromium was added to the formula to provide support for the product’s efficacy in maintaining glucose metabolism and normal blood glucose levels. The Company also informed DSSRC that the reformulation had no impact on the weight loss effectiveness of ThermoFight X’s primary ingredient Green Select Phytosome.

In conclusion, DSSRC agreed that IW provided reliable and competent scientific evidence to demonstrate that ThermoFight X has been clinically proven to produce weight loss of 31 pounds in 90 days. However, DSSRC also determined that because the test subjects’ adherence to a strict diet and exercise regimen partially contributed to the stated weight loss results, this was a material factor in obtaining the results claimed by IW. As such, this material information should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in any claims referencing the clinical results.

“2 pills (pill emoji), 30 pounds lost (down arrow emoji), 90 days who wants the deets?”

This Facebook post was disseminated by the same IW distributor responsible for the above post and, similarly DSSRC confirmed that the post has been removed. This post was accompanied by text from the distributor stating “on my way to the gym… Nonetheless… to get max results for my people who can’t make it to the gym…get this product now.”

Unlike the establishment claim post described in previous section of this analysis, this claim did not include the term “clinically proven” and did reference the exercise component that contributed to the weight loss results for ThermoFight X in the Company’s testing. However, DSSRC concluded that the social media post could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as suggesting that users could achieve “max results” without exercising but the evidence in the case record did not support such an assertion. While the IW distributor did refer to one material condition (i.e., exercise) that contributed to the average weight loss that could be expected from using ThermoFight X for 90 days, she failed to disclose the second component to the weight loss – that is adherence to low caloric diet.

Accordingly, with respect to any future weight loss claims made by IW that are based upon the 2009 clinical study that was provided to DSSRC, it is recommended that the advertising include reference in the body of the post (or in a clear and conspicuous disclosure) that adherence to a strict diet and exercise regimen contributed to the stated weight loss.

“It’s a new month and I have 10 new 90-day challenge spots open this weekend! I am looking for anyone who wants to lose 10-50 lbs and/or tighten and tone before summer!!”

This weight loss claim was also accompanied by a before-and-after photographic comparison and appeared as a stand-alone post on Facebook. This post was removed from circulation during the pendency of this inquiry.

DSSRC agreed that the Company’s removal of this post was necessary and appropriate because the range of weight loss communicated by the distributor (i.e., 10-50 lbs.) exceeded the average weight loss that was reported in the 2009 study. Furthermore, no evidence was provided by IW indicating any test subjects lost 50 lbs. during the 90-day test period. As such, the express weight loss claim was not supported.

Lastly, in its assessment of the appropriateness of this claim, DSSRC noted that the post was presented in an unqualified context and, again, reinforced the obligation of IW to disclose that adherence to a strict diet and exercise regimen contributed to the stated weight loss.

“Previous testers have lost ON AVERAGE 31 pounds in ONLY 90 days 💖 CLINICALLY PROVEN weight loss  you will lose 2.5X MORE weight than just diet and exercise ALONE! This PROD is 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥂

The claims above were communicated in a Facebook post by an IW distributor that was discontinued during the pendency of the inquiry. More specifically, the claims appeared as text in the IW distributor’s post and was accompanied by an image of woman with a highlighted claim stating “lose 31 pounds in 90 days! w/ ThermoFight X”.

DSSRC agreed with the Company that the two quantified claims stated in the post (i.e., “previous testers lost on average 31 pounds in only 90 days” and “you will lose 2.5X MORE weight than just diet and exercise ALONE!” were consistent with the results of the Dulloo study on the primary ingredient in ThermoFight X.

DSSRC also concluded that, unlike the other weight loss social media posts for ThermoFight X that were reviewed by DSSRC, the weight loss results communicated in this post were adequately qualified with a disclosure that the results were achieved with “diet and exercise.”

Accordingly, although the post has been since removed by IW, DSSRC concluded that the qualified weight loss claim was nevertheless appropriately communicated to consumers.

  • “Accelerates ketosis by supporting rapid ketone generation” and “Boosts energy”

    The above two claims were also made on the ThermoFight X product information sheet on the IW website. According to information provided by the Company, the product has been enhanced with additional caffeine from a concentrated green tea extract.

    Ketosis is a natural metabolic state that involves the body producing ketone bodies out of fat and using them for energy instead of carbohydrates. As support for this claim, the Company presented several studies to demonstrate the correlation of caffeine to the production of ketones and, consequently increased energy. Notably, in one study entitled “Caffeine Intake increases ketones: an acute metabolic study in humans” [27] , Canadian researchers evaluated the effects of caffeine consumption in subjects who ate breakfast after fasting for 12 hours. These individuals were given either no caffeine, the equivalent of about a cup and a half of coffee, or a caffeine equivalent of three (3) cups of coffee. Blood samples were then taken to evaluate not only the caffeine levels over four hours, but also the levels of ketones that were manufactured in the liver from the liberation of body fat. The test results indicated that higher dosages of caffeine in the ten (10) healthy adults dramatically increased beta-hydroxybutyrate, one of the most studied ketones as it relates to powering the brain and that the increase in blood ketones brought on by caffeine consumption was twice that observed after an overnight fast.

    Another study,[28]reported that after administration of 10 mgs of caffeine, energy expenditure increased significantly (p<0.001) during the last hour of the test which was significantly higher than the corresponding values obtained after administration of either the placebo or a caffeine adrenoceptor blocker.

    Accordingly, DSSRC agreed that the studies provided by IW provided a reasonable basis for its claims regarding increased energy and ketone production.

  • “Activates thermogenesis to achieve and maintain an ideal fat burn.” 

    This claim was disseminated on the ThermoFight X product information sheet on the IW website and characterizes the mechanism of action of the primary product ingredients to increase lipolysis through thermogenesis. The Dulloo study provided by IW[29] reported that EGCG increases caloric consumption by increasing thermogenesis through the inactivation of norepinephrine. The study also reported that a green tea extract stimulates brown adipose tissue thermogenesis to a greater extent than can be attributed to its caffeine content per se, and that its thermogenic properties could reside primarily in an interaction between its high content in catechin-polyphenols and caffeine with sympathetically released noradrenaline.

    DSSRC determined that the information provided in this study and the other published information provided by IW describing the relationship of the product’s primary GreenSelect Phytosome ingredient and thermogenesis provided adequate substantiation for its claim regarding thermogenesis activation.

  • “Supports healthy blood sugar levels to reduce sugar cravings.”

IW referenced several studies as support for the above claim which was communicated on the ThermoFight X product information sheet on the IW website. In one study,[30] researchers found that chlorogenic acid (CGA) was not only effective in preventing weight gain, but it also helped maintain normal blood sugar levels and healthy liver composition.

The Company also provided a meta-analysis of a number of in-vivo studies which have observed that CGA can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism and improve insulin sensitivity. [31] In one preliminary 12-subject human study[32], coffee enriched with CGA in the test group reported a 6.9% reduction in glucose uptake compared to the control group. The authors of the study concluded that CGA conveys significant support for healthy weight management and affects blood glucose uptake in a health-promoting manner.

Another study referenced in the IW submission specifically investigated the effects of chlorogenic acids in coffee on glucose uptake systems in the gut.[33] This small 3-way, randomized, crossover, human clinical trial involved nine (9) healthy volunteers who consumed 25g glucose in either: caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee (equiv. to 2.5mmol chlorogenic acid/L), or 400mL water as a control. Blood samples were taken at regular intervals for the next three hours to monitor blood glucose levels, insulin levels, and also levels of key gastrointestinal hormones to attempt to determine effects on glucose metabolism and a possible method of action in the gut. The study administrators reported that when compared to both decaffeinated coffee and control beverage consumption, caffeinated coffee tended to result in higher plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during the first 30 minutes after consumption. The authors hypothesized that the results were expected due to caffeine’s known tendency to encourage a small spike in blood glucose levels. In sum, the study concluded that moderate coffee consumption has been found to be related with higher likelihood of maintaining healthy blood glucose levels throughout an individual’s lifetime. Moreover, the study lends support to past observations that the chlorogenic acid is responsible for the beneficial glucose metabolism effects.

Accordingly, DSSRC determined that the totality of research provided by It Works provided sufficient support for it claim that ThermoFight X supports healthy blood sugar levels.

 

CONCLUSION

IW removed several of the social media posts from IW distributors that were communicating both income and product performance claims to consumers before and shortly after the self-regulatory inquiry was commenced. DSSRC determined that the removal of the posts was necessary and appropriate as a number of posts referenced distributor income that was atypical and did not include any disclosures regarding the annual income that could be generally expected by IW distributors.

The Company also agreed to remove several implied income claims from the IW website. More specifically, IW agreed to remove unqualified testimonial claims that DSSRC determined could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning that IW distributors typically earn a significant monthly income to pay off student loans, monthly household bills, and buy gas. The Company also removed claim made on social media platforms by IW distributors suggesting that they typical distributor will earn enough income to retire in two years.

In addition, the Company voluntarily removed online claims representing that IW distributors can earn “unlimited income” and that there was “No limit to the amount of money that you can earn.” DSSRC did not object to the descriptive claims on the ThermoFight X product information sheet found on the It Works website.

As it pertains to It Works future modifications of atypical earnings claims, DSSRC concluded that in the absence of a clear and conspicuous disclosure indicating the amount of earnings that may be generally expected by consumers or incoming recruits, the presentation of a hyperlink to an income disclosure statement, by itself, will not be sufficient to satisfy the the Company’s disclosure obligations.

With respect to the product performance claims that were communicated both by IW on its official website and on social media posts by IW’ distributors, DSSRC agreed with IW that the before and after comparison regarding the results of the IW Cleanse did not depict dramatic or significant weight loss and that the minimal results portrayed in the comparison would be consistent with peripheral weight loss that results from most cleansing regimens. DSSRC confirmed that the Company removed the post at issue regarding depicted efficacy results of a combined usage of It Works! Keto Coffee and It Works! Super Greens. DSSRC also agreed with IW that the before-and-after photo depicting the results achieved from using the It Works! Wrap was not inappropriate as the before-and-after photo depicted very modest results and did not communicate to consumers that use of the It Works! Body Wrap for stated 12-hour time period would cause atypical “substantial weight loss.” Notwithstanding this conclusion, DSSRC also determined that depicted results of the It Works! Body Wrap occurred from the use of two component products that are also individually offered for sale by the Company and that because this information is material to consumers, the information should be disclosed in any advertising and social media posts disseminated by IW distributors. Moreover, DSSRC recommended that in the future, IW should disclose that the generally expected results from the It Works! Wrap are temporary and that consumers should not construe the depicted results as being long-term or permanent.

As it pertains to the claims at issue for ThermoFight X, DSSRC concluded that the clinical study submitted by IW was satisfactorily conducted and produced reliable, statistically significant results and provided adequate support for the establishment claims at issue. However, it was also determined that because the test subjects’ adherence to a strict diet and exercise regimen partially contributed to the stated weight loss results that this was a material factor in obtaining the results claimed by IW and this information should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in any social media posts referencing the clinical results. Similarly, DSSRC recommended that the Company eliminate any social media posts that make an unqualified reference to weight loss results that exceed the amount reported in the clinical study.

 

COMPANY STATEMENT

 “It Works! understands the DSSRC’s mission and appreciates the thoughtful, thorough, and professional way that the DSSRC approached It Works! with its concerns and comments about the product and earnings marketing claims made by It Works! and its independent distributors.  It Works! does not admit that it violated any statutes, regulations or properly promulgated rules. It Works! points out that the DSSRC opinion is largely based upon FTC guidance reports, which have not been properly noticed and published based upon proper rulemaking procedures and do not operate as law (the DSSRC recognizes this as its own policies and procedures do not include FTC Guidance materials as a proper source upon which to base a decision.)[34][35] Further, It Works! notes that the DSSRC report refers to average annual income and average monthly income. It Works! notes that providing a simple numerical number is not meaningful nor is it the proper standard for income disclosure as there is a substantial difference between the “generally expected result” (the standard adopted by the FTC) and an average. At a minimum, the information contained in the income disclosure statement should be provided and not a simple average number provided on its own.

Notwithstanding the above, It Works! agrees to adhere to the DSSRC’s recommendations, and in fact, has already done so. It Works! maintains a robust compliance program that includes, but is not limited to, a dedicated compliance team, specific policies and procedures that all independent distributors agree to upon enrollment, subscription to an industry leading distributor compliance monitoring program, and ongoing education provided to our independent distributors and our corporate team. In response to the DSSRC’s inquiry pointing out specific claims and areas of concern, It Works! immediately investigated and took a proactive stance in addressing each point of concern, requiring that distributors remove improper social media posts, updating and revising the company website, and providing the research and documentation in support of specific product claims. It Works! will continue to monitor and review distributor claims. It Works! plans to implement additional distributor training and monitoring in 2020 to achieve even better compliance moving forward.“

 

(Case No. 7-2019 PCM, closed on 10/30/2019)

© 2019. BBB National Programs, Inc.


[1] It Works! provided DSSRC with a copy of its Mission Statement. It states: “The It Works! Compliance team is dedicated to protecting and preserving the integrity of the company while serving its valued team of Distributors. The mission of the Compliance Department is to uphold the company’s dedication to excellence by providing knowledge of and adherence to the It Works! Policies and Procedures. We will establish and maintain operating procedures and a culture of integrity to prevent, detect, and resolve issues of business misconduct or noncompliance in a courteous, friendly and nonthreatening manner, being proactive whenever possible.”

[2] A copy of the It Works! Compliance Policy and Procedures was provided to DSSRC.

[3] It Works! also described its internal protocol for investigating and reconciling compliance issues which can ultimately result in distributor termination if the matter remains unresolved.

[4] It Works! noted that in 2018, 39,758 Before and After submissions were reviewed. 17,942 of the submissions were approved and 21,413 were denied.

[5] “Caffeine intake increases plasma ketones: An acute metabolic study in humans.” Vandenberghe C, St-Pierre V, Courchesne-Loyer A, Cunnane SC, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2016 Nov; 95(4).

[6] “Roles of chlorogenic acid on regulating glucose and lipids metabolism: a review.” Meng S, Cao J, Feng Q, Peng J, Hu Y., Evid Based Complement Alternat Med.  2013;2013:801457.

[7] Dulloo AG, Seydoux J Giradier L, Chantre P, Vandermander J. Green Tea and thermogeneisis: interactions between catechin-polyphenols, caffeine and sympoathetic activity. Int j Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Feb;24(2):252-8.

[8] See Wildtree, Inc,. DSSRC Case No. 1-2019

[9] https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-staffrevises-online-advertising-disclosure-guidelines/130312dotcomdisclosures.pdf.

[10] Based on the It Works! 2016 Annual Disclosure Statement. It Works! advised DSSRC that it is currently in the process of preparing its 2018 Income Disclosure Statement which will be available as a stand-alone link on the It Works! website 

[11] Id.

[12] FTC Business Guidance Concerning Multi-Level Marketing, §13 (January 2018)

[13] Healthine Media; “Weight loss Cleanses: Why do they work?”,  https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/weight-loss-cleanse#what-it-is

[14] See https://static.myitworks.com/productsheets/32602/32602-productinfo-en.pdf

[15] See “ Gut Check: A Reference Guide for Media Spotting False Weight Loss Claims”,; https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/gut-check-reference-guide-media-spotting-false-weight-loss

[16] Id

[17] See the It Works! Body Wrap page at https://itworks.com/shopping/item/111

[18] Additionally, It Works! offers a Defining Gel that is often used in conjunction with the Body Applicator and the Fab Wrap. If results depicted in advertisements or social media post by It Works! distributors occurred partially as a result of using the Defining Gel, DSSRC recommended that the Company disclose this in the posts and/or advertisements.

[19] “GreenSelect Phytosome as an Adjunct to a Low calorie Diet for Treatment of Obesity: A Clinical Trial, ” Di Pierro,Menghi,Barreca, Lucarelli and Calandrelli. Alternate Medicine Review, Volume 14, Number 2, 2009.

[20] The average starting weight of the Diet only group was 209 lbs. and the average starting weight of the GreenSelect group was 211 lbs.

[21] See Avon Products, Inc., Skin-So Soft Guard Plus 3535 Insect Repellant, NAD Case #3922, 6/24/02 and iQ Derma/Intelligent Beauty , LLC, ERSP Case #198 (11/21/08).

[22] See ReliefBand Technologies, LLC, ReliefBand, ERSP Case #424 (7/18/18).

[23] Alternative Medicine Review is dedicated to providing accurate, timely, and clinically relevant original research articles, literature reviews, monographs, abstract, and editorials for the practicing health care practitioner.

[24] Test subjects who did not take the test product and adhered to a hypocaloric diet and exercise regimen averaged weight loss of 11 lbs. after the 90-day examination period.

[25] Federal Trade Commission’s Advertising FAQS; A Guide for Small Business. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/advertising-faqs-guide-small-business. April 2001.

[26] Id.

[27] Vandenberghe C, St. Pierre V, Courchesne-Loyer A, Cunnane SC, Evidence Based Complement Alternative Medicine, 2013; Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2016 Nov; 95(4).

[28] Acheson KJ, et al, “Metabolic Effects of caffeine in humans; lipid oxidation or futile cycling? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004 Jan; 79(1) 40-6.

[29] Supra at 20.

[30] Yongjie Ma, Mingming Gao, Dexi Liu. Chlorogenic Acid Improves High Fat Diet-Induced Hepatic Steatosis and Insulin Resistance in Mice. Pharmaceutical Research, 2014; DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1526-9

[31] Shengxi Meng, Jianmei Cao, Qin Feng, Jinghua Peng and Yiyang Hu. Roels of Chlorogenic Acid on Regulating Glucose and Lipids metabolism: A Review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013; Article ID 801457.

[32] Thom E. 2007. The effect of chlorogenic acid enriched coffee on glucose absorption in healthy volunteers and its effect on body mass when used long-term in overweight and obese people. Journal of International Medical Research. 35(6); 900-908.

[33] Johnston KL, Clifford MN, Morgan LM. 2003. Coffee acutely modifies gastrointestinal hormone secretion and glucose tolerance in humans: glycemic effects of chlorogenic acid and caffeine. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 78(4):728-33.

[34] The DSSRC’s Policies and Procedures identify the following sources as proper foundation for its findings:

DSSRC shall look to statutes, regulations, judicial precedent, and self-regulatory decisions from the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs (NAD), Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) and/or National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the DSA Code of Ethics, or the BBB Code of Advertising.

https://bbbprograms.org/programs/DSSRC/dssrc-policies-and-procedures/

[35] It Works! further points out that reliance on FTC Guidance Reports as a legal standard is a key allegation in the recently filed lawsuit, Nerium International, LLC, et al. vs. Federal Trade Commission filed in the Northern District of Illinois (Civ. No. 1-19-cv-7189).  

Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #315

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") regarding four social media posts that communicated earnings claims and five posts that communicated health-related product claims. DSSRC expressed concern that the earnings claims conveyed that a typical salesforce member could achieve “financial freedom” and that typical Company salesforce members could earn...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #314

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets skin care and cosmetic products.  The claims at issue consisted of two product performance claims and seven earnings claims that were disseminated on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #313

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that markets nutritional supplements, bath and beauty care treatments, aromatherapy, home accents, and motivational products regarding seven product performance claims and four earnings claims that were disseminated by the Company's salesforce on Facebook and Youtube, including one claim that appeared on the...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #312

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that sells adult novelty products regarding nine Facebook posts that communicated earnings claims. DSSRC expressed concern about the posts conveyed claims regarding the potential income a typical salesforce member could earn from the Company's business opportunity, including the possibility of achieving...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #311

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that sells health supplements regarding two social media posts that communicated earnings claims, two posts that communicated health-related claims, and one claim on the Company website that communicated a parity claim regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s products. DSSRC expressed concern that the posts...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #310

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that sells personal protective equipment regarding fifteen social media posts that communicated earnings claims. Thirteen of the posts were communicated on Facebook, one appeared on Pinterest and the remaining blog post was created by a third party with no affiliation to the Company. DSSRC...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #309

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted, a direct selling company (Company”) that sells wine and spirits, regarding three Facebook posts and one YouTube video that communicated earnings claims. DSSRC expressed concern about the posts conveyed claims regarding the potential income that a typical salesforce member could earn from the Company's business opportunity, including the...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #308

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that markets nutrition, personal care, home cleaning and cosmetic products regarding two references to “financial freedom.”  One reference was made by an independent contractor and disseminated on his LinkedIn page and the second reference was made on the Company website. The website also featured a short...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #307

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") headquartered in Europe that markets magnetic jewelry products regarding 12 product performance claims (including hashtags) that were disseminated on Facebook. DSSRC was concerned that the claims at issue communicated the message that the Company’s products could prevent or treat health-related conditions...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #306

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") regarding five social media posts that communicated earnings claims and three posts that communicated health-related product claims. DSSRC expressed concern that the earnings claims conveyed that a typical salesforce member could achieve “financial freedom” and that typical Company salesforce members could earn...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #305

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that sells bath and body products regarding four social media posts that communicated earnings claims and two posts that communicated health related claims. DSSRC expressed concern about the posts conveyed claims regarding the potential income that a typical salesforce member could earn from the Company's...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #304

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets nutritional supplement and weight-loss products regarding health claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue consisted of six health-related product claims that were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #303

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that markets dietary supplements and other personal care products regarding certain claims that appeared on social media platforms including Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and TikTok. The claims identified by DSSRC in the inquiry consisted of five earnings claims and two product claims. With respect to the...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #302

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that markets travel products regarding 15 earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by members of the Company's salesforce. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company about the social media posts conveying claims regarding the potential income that a typical salesforce member could earn from the...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #301

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company ("Company") that markets health, fitness and beauty products regarding five earnings claims disseminated by members of the Company's salesforce on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #300

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) reached out to a direct selling company ("Company") that sells home and personal fragrance products regarding seven earnings claims disseminated on social media by members of the Company's salesforce. DSSRC expressed concern about the posts conveying claims regarding the potential income that a typical salesforce member could earn from the Company's...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #299

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets health and wellness products regarding nine earnings and health claims disseminated on Facebook by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #298

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that sells health, wellness, and beauty products, regarding 11 product performance claims and two earnings claims that were disseminated by salesforce members on Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram and X.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #297

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that sells personal care and cleaning products regarding claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue consisted of nine earnings claims that were disseminated on Facebook and Loom.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #294

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company that markets household good products regarding seven social media posts that were disseminated by a salesforce member on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #293

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding seven earnings claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #292

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company that sells meal kits and other food accessories regarding 13 earning claims that were disseminated on Facebook, LinkedIn, and TikTok by Company salesforce members. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #291

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) specializing in the clean air industry regarding ten earnings claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #290

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts disseminated by Company salesforce members on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #289

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #288

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eight claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #287

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eleven earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #286

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding ten earning claims disseminated on Facebook and Instagram and which included terms such as “financial freedom”, “unlimited earnings potential” and “debt free.” 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #285

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding nine earnings claims and one product performance claim disseminated on Facebook by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #284

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding nine earnings claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The posts at issue originated from Facebook and Pinterest.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #281

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding seven product performance claims disseminated on Facebook by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #280

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding ten earnings claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The posts at issue originated from Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #279

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eight earning claims disseminated on Facebook by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #278

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eight product performance claims and nine earnings claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #277

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding twelve earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #276

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding fourteen earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and Pinterest.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #275

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets home décor and fashion accessories regarding eight earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. All of the claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #274

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets beauty products regarding seven earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #273

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets CBD products regarding fifteen product performance claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. More specifically, the claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and Instagram.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #272

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding twelve earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and on the Company website.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #271

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding twelve product performance claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook, Vimeo, Pinterest, and Twitter.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #270

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets CBD products regarding eleven product performance claims and one earnings claim disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Twitter, TikTok, Facebook and Instagram. Although several of the social media posts were disseminated in 2019 or...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #269

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding six earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #268

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eight product claims and four earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #267

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding ten product claims and four earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.


Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #266

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that specializes in hemp-based CBD oil products regarding eleven product claims and four earning claims that were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.


Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #265

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding nine earning claims disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #264

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets jewelry and other accessories regarding ten earnings claims that were disseminated on social media. All of the claims appeared on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #263

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets clothing products regarding seven earnings claims that were disseminated on Facebook by Company salesforce members.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #262

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding fourteen product performance claims and one earnings claim disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #261

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding ten earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. The claims at issue were all disseminated on Facebook.

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #260

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that markets dietary supplement products regarding six product performance claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members and as well as weight-loss depictions and testimonials that appeared on the Company’s website. DSSRC expressed its concerns regarding the claims that the...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #259

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that sells women’s beauty products regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue originated from eleven social media posts disseminated on Facebook. The eleven Facebook posts included claims that salesforce members can generally...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #258

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry involving a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding four earnings claims disseminated by Company salesforce members on Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and YouTube. The inquiry pertained to the Company’s use of terms such as “a debt-free life,” “financial freedom,” and social media posts suggesting that the typical Company sales...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #257

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that markets travel-related products regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members as well as an earnings claim made in the Company’s compensation plan on the Company’s website. The claims which were disseminated by Company salesforce members were...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #256

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding nine earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members on Facebook and the Company website. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #255

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and one health-related product claim that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue were all disseminated on Facebook. 

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #254

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue were disseminated on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. DSSRC contacted the Company and expressed concern that these social media posts could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #253

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. All of the posts at issue were disseminated on Facebook. DSSRC contacted the Company and expressed concern that these social media posts could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning that the typical...

Read the Decision
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #252

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) opened an inquiry with a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding certain earnings claims disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #251

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and health-related claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #250

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. All but one of the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #249

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that sells wellness products regarding certain product and earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #248

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #247

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue were all disseminated on Facebook. DSSRC contacted the Company and expressed concern that these social media posts could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning that the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #246

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that sells cosmetic products regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The posts were identified as part of DSSRC’s ongoing monitoring process, which found thirteen posts on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #245

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that sells several brands of weight-loss and nutritional wellness products regarding certain earnings claims and health-related product claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The posts were identified as part of DSSRC’s ongoing monitoring process, which found three...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #244

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct-selling company (“Company”) that sells cosmetic products regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media and YouTube by the Company’s salesforce members. The ten posts which were disseminated by Company salesforce members were identified pursuant to DSSRC’s ongoing monitoring process. DSSRC determined that the posts...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #243

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and a health-related product claim that were disseminated on social media and online by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue originated from five social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one claim that was posted online and which made significant earnings...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #242

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that sells women’s beauty products regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue originated from eight social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one disseminated on YouTube. The seven Facebook posts included claims that...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #241

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue consisted of 17 social media posts disseminated on Facebook. DSSRC contacted the Company and expressed concern that these posts could be reasonably interpreted by consumers as meaning...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #240

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue originated from four social media posts disseminated on Facebook. DSSRC contacted the Company and expressed concern that these posts communicated statements that could be reasonably...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #239

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media. The claims at issue originated from two posts disseminated on Facebook.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #238

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six social media posts that were disseminated on social media and that were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC was concerned that the posts communicated health-related product claims including those regarding the human body’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #237

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six social media posts that were disseminated on Facebook, Instagram and Pinterest that were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the direct selling industry.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #236

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included fourteen (14) posts that were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube, and included unlimited income claims (e.g., “unlimited income potential”), financial freedom income claims...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #235

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding seven social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one Linked-In post that were identified pursuant to DSSRC’s monitoring of product and earnings claims communicated in the direct selling industry. The eight posts included claims that salesforce members can earn generally expect to earn significant...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #234

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and product performance claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included nine (9) posts that were disseminated on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter and included residual income (e.g., “… work on your own terms and create...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #233

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and one product performance claim that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included sixteen (16) posts that were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube, and included unlimited income (e.g., “Unlimited income potential”) and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #232

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry regarding six earnings claims and one product performance claim communicated on social media posts disseminated by salesforce members of a direct selling company (“the Company”). Six of the identified claims were disseminated on Facebook and the remaining claim was communicated on a YouTube video.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #231

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry into a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members of the Company on seven Facebook posts, one Twitter post and on the Company website. DSSRC expressed its concerns that the claims at issue communicated the messages that salesforce members can achieve financial freedom, take free trips...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #230

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry involving a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding six earnings claims disseminated by Company salesforce members on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. The claims identified by DSSRC included, but were not limited to, “earn 4 to 5 figures income,” “you decide your income,” “I paid off my entire family’s medical bills,” “I just paid...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #229

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings and product claims that were disseminated on social media by Company salesforce members. More specifically, the earnings claims at issue in two social media posts referenced replacement income that could be realized through the Company’s business opportunity (“quit my 9-5 and made...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #228

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry into a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members of the Company on social media. The social media posts at issue included claims that salesforce members could earn full-time income, and/or substantial amounts of money in a short time, obtain financial freedom, and be their own boss....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #227

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) initiated an inquiry into a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding earnings claims disseminated by both the Company and its salesforce members on Facebook. The Facebook posts included claims of full-time income, unlimited income, and that the Company’s business opportunity can provide participants with the ability to make car payments, take vacations and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #226

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that offers nutritional beverages regarding certain earnings and product claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. More specifically, the seven earnings claims and twelve product claims at issue were all communicated on Facebook. The product claims brought to the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #225

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) that markets health and wellness products regarding three earnings claims and six health-related claims disseminated by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. The social media posts at issue included earnings claims stating that salesforce members could generally expect to achieve financial freedom and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #224

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims and products claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included fifteen (15) posts that were disseminated on Facebook and YouTube and included unlimited income, full-time income claims (e.g., “Can be a great side job for...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #223

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding seventeen social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one YouTube video. These social media posts were identified by DSSRC through its monitoring of the direct selling industry. The Facebook posts included references to the ability of Company salesforce members to earn significant monthly income...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #222

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding nine earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members of the Company on Facebook. While one of the Facebook posts conveyed only that the Company’s business opportunity could provide salesforce members with a supplemental income to help pay down a bill, others conveyed that the Company’s direct selling...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #221

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue were made via five Facebook posts and two YouTube videos. These claims included unqualified earnings claims, such as, but not limited to, financial freedom and unlimited income. DSSRC...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #220

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a company (“Company”) regarding five social media posts disseminated on Facebook that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. The posts included references to, among other things, the Company’s “unlimited income” potential, claims that salesforce members will earn “residual income” and a statement regarding how...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #219

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue included five (5) posts that were disseminated on Facebook and included unlimited income (e.g., “An unlimited income opportunity’) and full-time income claims (e.g., “Earn full-time...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #218

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated on social media by the Company’s salesforce members. The claims at issue were made via 11 posts on Facebook and included quantified earnings claims as well as claims that Company salesforce members can earn trips, significant income, free jewelry, financial...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #217

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding four earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members of the Company on social media. During the pendency of DSSRC’s inquiry, DSSRC identified four additional earnings claims that were disseminated by salesforce members of the Company on social media and brought those claims to the Company’s attention....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #216

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a company (“Company”) regarding eighteen social media posts disseminated on Facebook and YouTube that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. Fifteen of the social media posts made health-related claims regarding skin conditions such as, but not limited to, eczema and psoriasis. DSSRC was also concerned that...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #215

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding four social media posts disseminated on Facebook that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. Three of the posts included references to the ability for Company salesforce members to earn full time income. In addition, the remaining post referenced the COVID-19...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #214

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding four social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one YouTube video that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company that all five posts communicated atypical earnings claims regarding the amount of income that could be...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #213

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding five social media posts disseminated on Facebook and one YouTube video that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. The Facebook posts included references to the efficacy of the Company’s products to treat several health-related conditions including arthritis and...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #212

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a company (“Company”) regarding thirteen social media posts disseminated on Facebook that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. The posts included references to, among other things, the Company’s “unlimited income potential” and how salesforce members can earn “$1,000 a month,” become “financially...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #211

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three social media posts disseminated on YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok. DSSRC was concerned that these posts may be reasonably interpreted as communicating that by partaking in the Company’s business opportunity, salesforce members would earn a substantial income. The posts were identified by DSSRC...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #210

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding fourteen social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products were effective in treating a number of serious health conditions including, but not limited to, COVID-19, heart disease, migraines, osteoporosis, and stress. The posts were identified by DSSRC...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #209

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding eight Facebook that were disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members. The social media posts at issue referenced the ability of the Company’s products to address, among other conditions, pain, anxiety, depression, diabetes, arthritis, fibromyalgia and high blood pressure.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #208

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members on social media. The claims conveyed that the Company’s business opportunity offered financial freedom and full-time income as well as express claims regarding the monthly income that could be earned through selling the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #207

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products were effective in treating a number of serious health conditions including diabetes, high blood pressure, cancer, and coronavirus. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing,...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #206

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products are effective in treating a number of serious health conditions including, but not limited to, arthritis, diabetes, depression, anxiety, Lyme disease, and Lupus. The posts were identified by DSSRC...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #205

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding eight social media posts disseminated on Facebook and YouTube that DSSRC was concerned may be reasonably interpreted as communicating that Company’s products are effective to treat a number of serious health-related conditions including cancer, autism, Parkinson’s disease and arthritis. In...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #204

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain claims that were disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members on social media. The claims included health-related product claims that the Company’s products addressed conditions including adrenal fatigue, hormonal imbalance, anxiety, depression and inflammation. The claims also included...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #203

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding certain earnings claims that were disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members on social media. The earnings claims promoted messages that the Company’s salesforce members could become “successful,” earn “an extra $500 a month,” and achieve “financial freedom and generational wealth.” DSSRC informed...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #202

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products are effective in treating several serious health related conditions such as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and asthma. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #201

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five social media posts that DSSRC was concerned were communicating inappropriate earnings claims. The posts included references such as “replace another income,” “full-time opportunity,” “travel for free,” “what would you do with an extra $500 a month?”, and “looking for a new career or...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #200

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six Facebook posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products are effective in treating a number of serious health conditions including arthritis, cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, kidney stones, and helps with weight loss. The posts were...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #199

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated unsubstantiated health and wellness benefits claims that the Company’s products can prevent certain diseases and protect against health-related conditions including COVID-19. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing,...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #198

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products are effective as a weight-loss supplement and in treating several serious health-related conditions including, but not limited to, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. The posts were identified by...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #197

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six social media posts disseminated by salesforce members. DSSRC was concerned that the posts communicated inappropriate earnings claims to consumers and potential salesforce members including representations of financial freedom and monthly income ranging from $500 to $1,000 a month.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #196

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five Facebook posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated unsubstantiated health and wellness benefits claims that the Company’s products can protect against health-related conditions including COVID-19. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #195

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts (i.e., one YouTube video and one Facebook post). DSSRC was concerned that post communicated the message that the Company’s products can help protect against COVID-19. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the direct selling...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #194

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts and three other online posts disseminated by salesforce members which DSSRC was concerned were communicating inappropriate earnings claims. The posts included references to “Full-time income/employment,” “unlimited income,” “long term residual income,” “significant income,” and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #193

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding earnings claims and product claims disseminated by company salesforce members on social media and by the Company on its website. DSSRC was concerned that such claims depicted success that may not be generally achievable by the typical consumer or individual engaged in direct selling of the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #192

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts disseminated by company salesforce members that communicated health-related product claims. In addition, DSSRC also inquired regarding certain earnings claims that appeared on the Company’s website as well as earnings claims disseminated by salesforce members on social...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #191

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members which DSSRC was concerned were communicating inappropriate earnings claims. The first post referenced the “unlimited earning potential” that could be realized through the Company’s business opportunity. The second post promised “additional...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #190

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. DSSRC was concerned that the posts were communicating the message that the Company’s products were effective in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #189

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. Two of the posts included the same copy which referenced the COVID-19 pandemic and the significant amount of income that two different Company salesforce members earned through the direct selling business opportunity. The third...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #188

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts made by international salesforce members of the Company. DSSRC expressed its concerns that the three posts, while originating outside of the United States, communicated the message that the Company's products are effective in the treatment of COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #187

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one YouTube video. DSSRC was concerned that the video, which was recorded and uploaded in Hungarian, made claims that the Company’s products are effective in the treatment of COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #186

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding nine social media posts disseminated by company salesforce members. DSSRC was concerned that these posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits claims that the Company’s products can protect against several health-related conditions including, but not limited to Diabetes,...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #185

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one social media post disseminated by a company salesforce member. Some of the language in the post made an atypical representation regarding the level of income that a salesforce member could expect to earn from the Company’s business opportunity. The post was identified by DSSRC pursuant to...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #184

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six social media posts. The inquiry involved a number of health-related posts which included claims that the Company’s products can treat Alzheimer’s disease and cancer and prevent diabetes and strokes. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #183

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding nine social media posts. DSSRC was concerned that these posts made both explicit and implied claims that typical salesforce members of the Company could generally expect to earn significant, full-time, or career replacement income through participating in the Company’s business opportunity. The...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #182

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts disseminated by salesforce members of the company. DSSRC was concerned that the posts communicated the message that employees of the Company could earn unlimited, residual income and that the posts made representations that were atypical for salesforce members of the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #181

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one social media post that was disseminated by a salesforce member of the Company. DSSRC was concerned that the post communicated that a typical salesforce member will earn a significant amount of income from the Company’s business opportunity. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #180

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts that were disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. DSSRC was concerned that all four posts communicated the message that the Company’s products were effective in the treatment and prevention of several serious health-related conditions including, but not limited...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #179

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts that DSSRC was concerned conveyed the message that the Company’s products were effective in treating several serious health-related conditions, such as Covid-19 and other viral infections. DSSRC was also concerned that one of the posts, made by an international...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #178

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts that conveyed the message that the Company's products can treat several serious health-related conditions including diabetes and autism. DSSRC was also concerned that some of the social media posts communicated the message that salesforce members can generally expect to...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #177

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding seven social media posts that DSSRC was concerned communicated the message that the Company’s products effectively treated serious health-related conditions such as cancer, diabetes, and migraines. The posts were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the direct...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #176

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts made by salesforce members of the Company. DSSRC was concerned that these posts conveyed the message that the Company’s products can effectively prevent or treat serious health-related conditions including eczema. DSSRC also brought to the attention of the company a series...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #175

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts that DSSRC believed to be communicating the message that the Company’s product was effective in the treatment of COVID-19 and two posts that DSSRC was concerned represented a level of income that could not be expected to be attained by the average salesforce member. The posts...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #174

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five Facebook posts that conveyed the message that the Company’s products effectively treated serious health-related skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis and the Company’s business opportunity will typically result in salesforce members earning “financial freedom” and “unlimited income”....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #173

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one YouTube video and two Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. DSSRC expressed concern that the video and the posts communicated the message that the Company’s products are effective as a treatment for several serious health conditions. In the YouTube video, the salesforce...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #172

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts (one of which was a Spanish-language post) disseminated by its salesforce members. DSSRC was concerned that the two posts communicated the message that the Company’s product was effective in the prevention and treatment of serious health-related conditions including, but not...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #171

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts that were disseminated by salesforce members of the company. DSSRC expressed concern that all three posts communicated the message that the Company’s products were effective in treating health-related conditions including, but not limited to, cancer, autism, diabetes, and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #170

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three social media posts disseminated by salesforce members that communicated the efficacy of the Company’s products to treat ADHD in children, COVID-19 and other health-related conditions. The social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #169

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts that DSSRC was concerned conveyed, either through depictions or accompanying text, that the Company’s salesforce members can earn a significant income through the Company’s business opportunity.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #168

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four social media posts that DSSRC was concerned contained health-related product claims including statements that the Company’s products could prevent, treat, or cure COVID-19. DSSRC identified the subject social media posts that were made by Company salesforce members through its ongoing...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #167

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts that were disseminated by its independent salesforce members. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #166

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four Facebook posts that were disseminated by its salesforce members. One post communicated health-related treatment claims regarding skin maladies. The remaining three posts included claims that potential recruits could replace income that was lost due to COVID-19, pay off debts, and earning...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #165

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four Facebook posts that were disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. All four of the post conveyed strong health-related product claims including the message that the Company’s products were effective to treat serious health conditions such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, and auto-immune diseases.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #164

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) brought three Facebook posts containing product claims to the attention of a direct selling company (the “Company”). The posts were disseminated by salesforce members of the Company and were identified by DSSRC pursuant to its ongoing, independent monitoring of the direct selling industry.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #163

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three social media posts that DSSRC was concerned contained health-related product and income claims including statements that may imply that the Company’s products could prevent, treat, or cure COVID-19. After commencement of its inquiry, DSSRC identified three additional social media posts by...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #162

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding social media posts that were disseminated by salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention through its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.    
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #161

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four Facebook posts that were disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. All four of the post conveyed strong health-related product claims including the message that the Company’s products were effective to treat serious health conditions such as COVID-19, ADHD, dementia, Alzheimer’s...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #160

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding social media posts that were disseminated by salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention through its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #159

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four Facebook posts that were disseminated by Company salesforce members. All four of the posts made reference to prospective salesforce members being able to “replace lost income” through the Company’s business opportunity and one of the posts included an implied reference to achieving...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #158

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) about two Facebook posts that were made by salesforce members of the Company. The first post conveyed strong health-related product claims including that the Company’s products combat COVID-19 and the second presented the earning opportunity afforded by selling the Company’s product as a way to make...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #157

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding five Facebook posts that came to its attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Four of the posts made health claims pertaining to the Company’s immunity boosting products and COVID-19. In the remaining post, the Company’s salesforce member...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #156

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts that came to its attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of marketing claims in the direct selling industry. These posts made by the Company’s salesforce members included serious health-related claims for its products regarding immunity boosting and cancer-prevention.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #155

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and a YouTube video that came to its attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of marketing claims in the direct selling industry. Both Facebook posts made financial freedom claims, and one made explicit “doubled my income” claims. The YouTube video made health-related claims...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #154

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts and a YouTube video that came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of direct selling claims disseminated on social media.  The first Facebook post included a video testimonial and claims pertaining to the medical benefits that could result from using the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #153

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and a Slideshare presentation that were identified pursuant to DSSRC’s independent monitoring of marketing claims in the direct selling industry. The two Facebook posts included claims that the Company’s product could treat COVID-19 and its accompanying symptoms. The Slideshare...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #152

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts made by salesforce members of the Company.  DSSRC was concerned that the three Facebook posts contained strong health-related product performance claims including but not limited to claims that certain of the Company’s products can treat and/or prevent chronic migraines,...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #151

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts that were identified by DSSRC as part of its ongoing monitoring of advertising and marketing claims in the direct selling industry.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #150

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and a YouTube video that came to its attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of marketing claims in the direct selling industry. In one Facebook post, the salesforce referenced earning $550 in the first month working for the Company. The second Facebook post included a...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #149

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one Facebook post and two TikTok posts disseminated by salesforce members of the Company.  DSSRC was concerned that the Facebook post conveyed disease treatment claims and that the TikTok posts contained strong health-related product performance claims including claims that the Company’s...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #148

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts communicated by Company salesforce members that referenced serious health-related conditions that purportedly could be addressed by use of the Company’s products.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #147

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding a number of social media posts disseminated by company salesforce members on Facebook. The subject claims came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #146

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding various social media posts disseminated by company salesforce members on Facebook. The subject claims which involved earnings claims regarding the amount of income that can be realized by the Company’s business opportunity, came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #145

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and a Youtube video disseminated by Company salesforce members. All three social media offerings were disseminated by salesforce members located overseas and all three included implied earnings claims that Company salesforce members can earn significant income through the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #144

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. The first post featured a depiction of the Company’s line of products in front of a backdrop that listed several serious health conditions including, but not limited to, cancer, lupus, heart disease, Alzheimer’s and dementia.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #143

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts made by salesforce members of the Company.  DSSRC was concerned that the three Facebook posts contained strong health-related product performance claims including claims that certain of the Company’s products can treat and/or prevent COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #142

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts made by salesforce members of the Company.  DSSRC was concerned that the three Facebook posts contained strong health-related product performance claims including claims that certain of the Company’s products can treat and/or prevent COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #141

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts that were disseminated by salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention through its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #140

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts that were disseminated by one active salesforce member and one inactive salesforce member. The first post discussed the efficacy of an ingredient in the Company’s product to protect against a number of serious health-related conditions including cancer, Alzheimer’s and high...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #139

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts disseminated by Company sales force members on Facebook. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #138

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members.  DSSRC was concerned that one of the posts conveyed claims that the Company’s products can protect against disease including express claims stating that the salesforce member is “COVID free” and the products being a “pandemic response.”...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #137

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts disseminated by Company sales force members on Twitter and Facebook. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #136

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding a Facebook post disseminated by a Company salesforce member that was located overseas. The social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. More specifically, the post included express claims that the Company’s products...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #135

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members, one found on YouTube and one found on Facebook. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #134

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two identical Facebook posts disseminated by two separate salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #133

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three identical Facebook posts disseminated by three separate salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #132

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding three Facebook posts and a YouTube video disseminated by Company salesforce members. The three Facebook posts all referenced an antioxidant ingredient in the Company’s product that was purportedly efficacious against certain disease conditions including, but not limited to, ADHD, autism and cancer....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #131

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding a social media post disseminated by a Company sales force member on YouTube. The subject claim which involved an earnings claim regarding the amount of income that can be realized by the Company’s business opportunity, came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #130

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding a video that was identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry and which was disseminated by a member of the Company salesforce team. In the video, the salesforce member makes unqualified representations regarding the potential of earning significant income within one year through...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #129

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) opened an inquiry with a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one Facebook post and one YouTube video that were disseminated by Company salesforce members located in Europe. The Facebook post made reference to “boosting the immune system” to protect against the corona virus during the winter months. The YouTube video similarly included claims...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #128

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding a testimonial video that was posted on Vimeo by a Company salesforce member. DSSRC was concerned that the video, which touted the salesforce member’s earnings as a direct seller, could be reasonably interpreted as implying that a new or prospective salesforce member of the Company could expect to...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #127

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding four Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. All four posts referenced the products ability to treat coronavirus by virtue of the product’s efficacy at boosting the immune system. While some of the claims expressly identified COVID-19  (e.g., “Lets fight COVID-19 – Boost...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #126

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two social media posts made by salesforce members of the Company.  Both posted touted the income opportunity afforded by the direct selling opportunity. In the context in which the posts were made, DSSRC was concerned with the claim that the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #125

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. DSSRC was concerned that the posts could be reasonably interpreted as meaning that the direct selling company’s products can treat or prevent several serious health-related conditions.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #124

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and two Instagram posts disseminated by Company salesforce members that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company that all four posts either expressly communicated or...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #123

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding one Facebook post and one online video disseminated by Company salesforce members. The marketing materials came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern to the Company that both social media posts conveyed...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #122

Social media advertising for a direct selling company that markets health and wellness products came to the attention of the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC identified two Facebook posts that were disseminated by a Company salesforce member as communicating egregious health-related claims. One post listed several serious...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #121

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five social media posts disseminated by Company salesforce members on Facebook and Instagram.  DSSRC was concerned that five of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits including claims that the Company’s products provide immune support that may...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #120

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #119

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five social media posts disseminated by Company salesforce members on Facebook and Instagram.  DSSRC was concerned that five of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits including claims that the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #118

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding five social media posts (i.e., four Facebook posts and one Instagram post) disseminated by independent salesforce members on behalf of the Company. The three social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #117

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding four Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company that two posts implied that the Company’s products offer protection from COVID-19. The two other social media posts...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #116

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding six posts made on social media by Company salesforce members.  DSSRC was concerned that the social media posts disseminated by these Company salesforce members included unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits including claims that the Company’s products can protect against...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #115

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts by Company salesforce members that referenced serious health-related conditions that purportedly could be addressed by use of the Company’s products. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #114

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding two Facebook posts making claims about the Company’s products. The Facebook posts were disseminated by a Company salesforce member and a former salesforce member of the Company. The social media posts were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #113

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company that all of the posts implied that the Company products are effective to treat a number of health-related...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #112

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry and disseminated by Company salesforce members. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #111

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company that is located outside of the United States regarding two Instagram posts and five Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #110

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Youtube posts, two Facebook posts and an Instagram post that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry and disseminated by Company salesforce members.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #109

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members that were identified during DSSRC’s monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC expressed its concern to the Company that the two posts implied that salesforce members can replace their income through participation in the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #108

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) commenced an inquiry with a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #107

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding a Facebook video post disseminated by a Company salesforce member. The video came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its routine monitoring of social media posts in the direct selling industry and it was determined that the video implied that the direct selling business opportunity offered by the Company...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #106

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) about three Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. Two of the posts in question implied that the Company’s nutritional products could help individuals that consume such products fight viruses including COVID-19. The other post made specific health-related product efficacy claims...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #105

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) about two Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members of the Company. The posts in question implied that engaging in direct selling of the Company’s products could provide replacement income for those out of work due to COVID and/or a new career during the current public health crisis.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #104

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by Company salesforce members. DSSRC expressed concern that both posts suggested that consumers could use the Company’s product to boost the immune system and prevent the cold and flu as an alternative to taking prescribed medication.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #103

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (Company) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #102

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) opened an inquiry into social media claims disseminated by the salesforce members for a direct selling company (Company). More specifically, DSSRC identified three Facebook posts which included claims suggesting that the Company’s product can remove the coronavirus from surfaces.  Although two posts communicated general effectiveness claims at removing...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #101

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (Company) regarding three coronavirus related hashtags that accompanied a post stating that the Company’s product can strengthen the immune system. Earlier this year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) stated that coronavirus related claims and hashtags when coupled with claims that a product can strengthen or boost the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #100

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts and one Instagram post disseminated by Company salesforce members. All three posts referenced the ability of the direct selling company’s product to prevent and eliminate the coronavirus.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #99

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding three Facebook post disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #98

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Instagram posts and one Facebook post disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #97

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) inquired about an Instagram post disseminated by a direct selling company’s (“Company”) salesforce member. The post in question inferred that the Company’s product could protect users from the coronavirus. DSSRC noted that at the time the post was disseminated, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization and the Food Drug...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #96

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members that included claims that the Company’s products can assist in treating a number of serious health-related conditions including, but not limited to, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and Multiple Sclerosis.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #95

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding two Facebook posts that referenced the ability of one of the  Company’s products to treat a number of health-related conditions including, but not limited to, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, diabetes and depression. Both of the posts were disseminated by the Company’s international salesforce members.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #94

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about one Instagram post disseminated by one of the company’s salesforce members regarding the Company’s product for children. DSSRC determined that the post inferred that use of the Company’s product would boost their immune system and protect children from COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #93

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) brought two Facebook posts to the attention of a direct selling company (“Company”) which included claims from salesforce members that the Company’s product can treat the coronavirus. More specifically, the first post stated that the Company’s product helps boost the immune system to fight viruses all around us including the coronavirus. The second Facebook...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #92

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by one of the company’s salesforce members that conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits including claims that the Company’s products can protect against disease and COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #91

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by the company’s salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern regarding the earnings claims that were communicated...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #90

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by one of the company’s salesforce members that makes product performance claims and references the current health crisis.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #89

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding one Facebook post disseminated by its salesforce member. The social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that this social media posts communicated that the Company’s products can protect...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #88

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding two Facebook post disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #87

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by one of the company’s salesforce members that contained a claim that implied that the direct selling company’s products could help prevent COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #86

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Instagram posts disseminated by the company’s salesforce members that pertained to the efficacy of the Company’s products regarding several serious health-related conditions.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #85

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three social media posts disseminated by the company’s salesforce members that conveyed aggressive product performance claims. Both social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising and marketing in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC was concerned...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #84

A direct selling company (“Company”) was contacted by the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) with respect to three Facebook posts that included claims that the Company’s products can boost the immune system and protect users from the coronavirus. Shortly after receipt of DSSRC initial correspondence, the Company contacted the salesforce members responsible for the posts and requested that the posts...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #83

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by the Company’s salesforce members that expressly associated the immune system support benefits provided by its products to the treatment of and/or protection against the coronavirus. One post, for example, claimed that the Company’s products helped him “overcome...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #82

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern that one of the social media posts communicated the message that the Company’s products can protect consumers against a...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #81

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by one of its salesforce members that contained several earnings claims including an express claim that salesforce members could earn $500 or more per month. Other claims at issue in the social media post included language describing the opportunity as zero-risk and money back guaranteed as well as the claim salesforce members could...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #80

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding two Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the posts conveyed the unsupported health-related message that the Company’s direct selling products can protect...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #79

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concerns that the posts conveyed unsupported product, health and wellness benefits and the message that the Company’s...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #78

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company (“Company”) regarding a Pinterest post and a claim on the company website, both of which referenced a business opportunity at the Company with unlimited income potential. More specifically, the Pinterest post featured a photograph of scattered $100 bills and the promise of glamourous trips, extra cash and unlimited income. In...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #77

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts communicated the message that the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #76

Social media advertising for a direct selling company that markets health and wellness products came to the attention of the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC identified three Facebook posts that were disseminated by Company salesforce members as communicating egregious health-related claims. One post stated “build your immune...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #75

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) contacted a direct selling company regarding a Facebook post that referenced the Company as providing an “unlimited earnings opportunity” and “financial freedom” for salesforce members. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #74

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) regarding five Facebook posts that discussed the ability of the Company’s products to treat and/or alleviate a number of health-related conditions including, but not limited to, cancer, depression, arthritis, memory loss and epilepsy. The Company responded to DSSRC and explained that all of the posts at issue were not disseminated by the Company or its...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #73

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members as well as two product performance claims, one business opportunity claim and nine consumer testimonials located on the Company’s website The subject claims and social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #72

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated health-related benefit claims related to the current COVID-19...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #71

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding five Facebook posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #70

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two Facebook posts disseminated by the company’s salesforce members that conveyed product performance stating and/or implying that the company’s products can help prevent or treat COVID-19. Both posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #69

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two YouTube videos disseminated by the company’s salesforce members that conveyed product performance claims while referencing the current global pandemic. Both videos came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #68

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by the company’s salesforce members that conveyed product performance claims. Both social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #67

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about certain social media posts disseminated by salesforce members regarding product efficacy claims that referenced “Corona Virus.” DSSRC also identified more general product claims regarding viruses that DSSRC was concerned could be reasonably interpreted could be reasonably interpreted as meaning that the company’s products are effective against the...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #66

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by salesforce members regarding business opportunities during the pandemic. The social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #65

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three business opportunity posts disseminated by salesforce members. The social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. 

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #64

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media post disseminated by salesforce members. The social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current COVID-19...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #63

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current COVID-19...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #62

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #61

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that two of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #60

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #59

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about six social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #58

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current COVID-19...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #57

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #56

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product health and wellness benefit claims related to the current...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #55

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the two social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated earnings claims that individuals could either take financial...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #54

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about five social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that three of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #53

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about twelve social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated health-related claims that the Company’s direct selling products...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #52

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about four social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #51

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #50

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #49

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce member. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #48

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct selling...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #47

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated earnings claims that individuals could make up lost income due to the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #46

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #45

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about one social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct selling...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #44

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the three social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated earnings claims that individuals can make a minimum level...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #43

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about one social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concerns that the social media post conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s direct selling...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #42

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concerns that two of the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #41

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the three Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #40

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about six social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the six Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #39

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about thirty-five social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concerns that thirty-three of the social media posts...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #38

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about five social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that four of the Facebook posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #37

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated on behalf of the company. The two social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the two disseminated social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness benefits that the...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #36

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding one earnings claim and one health related product claim disseminated on behalf of the company. The subject claims came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern to the direct selling company that the earnings claim conveyed an unsubstantiated earning potential claim. In...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #35

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about a social media post depicting the company’s name alongside an image of a hand stopping a coronavirus particle. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern to the direct selling company that the post conveyed unsubstantiated product claims...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #34

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding two Facebook posts that referenced the corona virus. The first post discussed the necessity to slow the spread of corona virus accompanied by a picture of the Company’s product. Viewers of the post are required to scroll down the screen to view language disclosing that, although the product has been proven to eliminate almost all viruses, it has not been tested...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #33

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that two Facebook posts disseminated by salesforce members conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #32

Social media posts disseminated by distributors for a multi-level company came to the attention of the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) pursuant to its internal monitoring process. More specifically, one Instagram post...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #31

Facebook posts disseminated by distributors for a direct selling company came to the attention of DSSRC pursuant to its monitoring program. One post referenced the corona virus and claimed that its products could act as an immune system booster. A second post stated that the Company’s products will help protect against Covid-19 and the corona virus. As DSSRC noted to the Company, the 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #30

DSSRC reviewed a social media post disseminated by an independent salesforce member of a direct selling company. DSSRC expressed its concern that the Facebook post suggested that the Company’s products may serve as a form of defense against Coronavirus.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #29

Social media posts disseminated by the salesforce of a direct selling company were identified by DSSRC as communicating claims that Company products are effective at treating Covid-19 and the symptoms associated with the virus. More specifically, four Facebook posts came to the attention of DSSRC through its routine monitoring program which included claims about attacking virus accompanied by hashtags that...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #28

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about two social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that two YouTube videos disseminated by salesforce members conveyed unsubstantiated product, health and wellness...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #27

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company about one social media post disseminated by a salesforce member. The subject social media post came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concern that the Facebook post disseminated by a salesforce member conveyed unsubstantiated product claims that the Company’s...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #26

DSSRC inquired about two social media posts disseminated by the salesforce of a direct selling company that came to its attention pursuant to its DSSRC’s independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern that the two Instagram posts conveyed unsubstantiated product claims that the Company’s products can protect against COVID-19 virus.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #25

DSSRC inquired about two product claims disseminated on Facebook by salesforce members for a multi-level marketing company. The claims pertained to the ability of the Company’s products to treat COVID-19 and the symptoms associated with the condition.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #24

DSSRC inquired into a two product claims disseminated on Facebook by a distributor for a multi-level direct selling company. DSSRC expressed its concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product claims that the Company’s products can protect against disease and the COVID-19 virus.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #23

DSSRC inquired into two Facebook posts disseminated by the salesforce of a direct selling company. The DSSRC expressed concern that the two social media posts unnecessarily referenced the COVID-19 crisis as an optimal opportunity to make money with the Company.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #22

DSSRC inquired into two product claims and one earnings claim disseminated on Facebook by distributors for a multi-level direct selling company. The claims were disseminated by salesforce force members regarding the ability of Company products to treat or prevent coronavirus disease and the earnings people who have recently lost income can make, or both.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #21

DSSRC inquired into a product claim disseminated on Facebook by a distributor for a multi-level direct selling company. The product performance claim pertained to the Company’s product being more potent than natural vitamins.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #20

DSSRC inquired about a social media post disseminated by the salesforce of a direct selling Company that came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its ongoing independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. DSSRC expressed concern that the post at issue conveyed unsubstantiated claims that the Company’s products can protect against COVID-19 virus.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #19

DSSRC inquired into hashtag claims disseminated on Instagram by a distributor for a multi-level direct selling company. The hashtags referenced a million dollar business and six figure earning potential included as well as a hashtag naming a specific direct selling company.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #18

In 2019, DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding several earnings claims on the direct selling company’s website as well as claims that were being disseminated by the company’s salesforce on social media.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #17

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company (the “Company”) about earnings claims disseminated on the Company’s website and on social media by salesforce members. Specifically, DSSRC identified a number of express and implied earnings claim that referenced financial freedom, exorbitant bonuses and vacations, luxury cars, the ability to pay off college loans and generous reward programs. The advertising also...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #16

DSSRC opened an inquiry into a multi-level marketing company regarding several business opportunity claims including aggressive, atypical income and bonus incentive claims that did not include disclosure of generally excepted results. The claims were disseminated on Facebook, in YouTube videos and on the Company website and were communicated expressly in the posts as well as through accompanying hashtags. More...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #15

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding unqualified income and product performance claims that were disseminated by its distributors. The claims appeared on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. More specifically, the posts by Company distributors claimed unlimited income opportunities, earning potential of up to $2,000 per month, and claims of working part time for full time income and replacing full...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #14

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding a product efficacy claim their products. More specifically, a claim from the Company’s international salesforce appeared on Instagram and claimed that the product can be used to treat COVID-19.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #13

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding two claims made by Company distributors that potential recruits can achieve financial freedom and that their products have health benefits.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #12

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three income claims. Specifically, claims from Company salesforce members appeared on various social media platforms including YouTube, Facebook and Facebook Watch and included references to company representatives being able to financially support themselves, make “good money” and the kind of income they desired. In addition, another post included a “part time...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #11

In 2020, a direct selling company contacted DSSRC seeking guidance regarding company events at which top distributors are recognized. The direct selling company stated that it had previously presented some of its highest performing distributors with oversized checks at the event but, since the success of those top distributors was not typical, it was concerned that the oversized checks might convey an...

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #10

DSSRC commenced an inquiry into a direct selling company regarding nine income claims. Claims from Company salesforce members appeared on various social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and YouTube and included unqualified references to the Company’s bonus and incentive reward program including references to luxury automobiles and atypical income representations. Income claims were also...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #9

DSSRC reviewed claims by a multi-level direct selling marketing company. The inquiry included one earnings claim stating: “actually make whatever figure you wanna put in there..” and included references to earnings of up to $30,000 a month. Another claim stated that the Company could help “… people part/full time make an incredible income.”
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #8

DSSRC investigated a multi-level direct selling marketing company regarding earnings claims that were primarily disseminated on Facebook. The claims involved the potential to achieve “financial freedom” and a substantial income or lavish lifestyle. One such claim mentioned that a mother who was working as a full-time teacher was able to earn over $28,000 last year as a result of selling the company’s goods, and...
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #7

DSSRC reviewed marketing for a direct selling company’s incentive trip reward. After discussions with DSSRC, the direct selling company included a disclosure informing consumers of what is needed to qualify for the incentive trip as well as how likely it is that the typical company representative would earn such an incentive trip. 
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #6

DSSRC investigated a multi-level direct selling company regarding its earning claims that were primarily found in posts on Facebook and in videos, which indicated that a lavish lifestyle could be achieved through selling the company’s products. The claims included buying a house with earnings from selling the company’s products and being able to generate several thousands of dollars in income per week....
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #5

DSSRC contacted a direct selling regarding marketing on the direct selling company’s website. Specifically, the company’s website included an unqualified claim regarding an incentive trip that could be earned by salesforce members.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #4

DSSRC inquired into the earning claims disseminated on Facebook by a multi-level direct selling company. The statements at issue mentioned the ability to earn a full-time income and the possibility of replacing one’s day job as well as earning perks such as all-expense paid vacations to exotic places.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #3

DSSRC inquired about income and incentive claims disseminated by a direct selling company. The claims at issue pertained to atypical and unqualified income claims and travel and incentive claims disseminated by company distributors on Facebook and YouTube.
Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #2

DSSRC opened an inquiry with a direct selling company regarding Instagram and Facebook posts made by the Company salesforce regarding claims of achieving “financial freedom,” a claim stating that potential recruits can “earn the income that want,” an unqualified claim of atypical earnings and an unqualified claim regarding company incentive trips.

Read more
Closure

DSSRC Administrative Closure #1

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) inquired with a direct selling company regarding twos social media posts disseminated by members of the Company salesforce. The first claim appeared on Instagram and stated that that the salesforce member was able to more than replace her salary from here previous, full-time job. 

Read more