NARB ProgramBackgrounds

National Advertising Review Board

The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is the advertising self-regulation industry’s appellate body. Five-member NARB panels hear cases appealing an NAD or CARU decision and provide independent industry peer review, ensuring truthfulness and accuracy in national advertising and helping promote voluntary compliance of its decisions—a key pillar of industry self-regulation.  

Program Impact

NARB, established in 1971 as a fair and impartial appellate body, reviews appealed NAD or CARU decisions. Nominated by various leading organizations in the advertising industry, NARB members are selected for their stature and experience in their fields. 

 

 

Truth & Transparency

When a competitor’s advertising harms consumer trust or threatens a company’s reputation and market share, the advertising self-regulatory system creates a level-playing field for business and helps ensure consumers receive truthful and accurate advertising.

Compliance

After a decision, NARB or the challenger can check in on whether the advertiser has made appropriate modifications to its advertising and has 10 days to respond. The case is closed if there is a good faith effort to bring their advertising into compliance.

Non-Compliance

In cases of lack of good faith efforts to modify or discontinue advertising as a result of a NARB decision, NARB will refer the case to an appropriate government agency, usually the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
 

For the last 50 years in the advertising industry, companies have held each other to a higher standard. In response to the pressures and criticisms of consumerism that had mounted during the previous decade, in 1971 the advertising industry established the National Advertising Division (NAD) and National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the U.S. mechanism of independent self-regulation that has stood the test of time and technological innovation.

 

Visit NAD50th.org

Guidelines & Procedures


Any advertiser or challenger has the right to appeal NAD’s decision to NARB.  An advertiser has an automatic right of appeal. A challenger must request permission to appeal from the NARB chair and explain why it believes there is a substantial likelihood NARB would come to a different conclusion on a case than NAD. 

 

News & Blog

Press Release

BBB National Programs Announces 85 Distinguished Members of 2021 National Advertising Review Board Panel

McLean, VA – January 5, 2021 – BBB National Programs today announced the 2021 Panel Pool Members for its National Advertising Review Board, the appellate body for the U.S. advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. The National Advertising Review Board panel pool members, selected for their stature and experience in their fields,...
Read Press Release
Press Release

BBB National Programs Partners with Facebook to Strengthen Truth-in-Advertising Enforcement on the Social Network's U.S. Platform

New York, NY – December 2, 2020 – Taking an important step to advance the effectiveness of its quick and efficient self-regulatory programs, BBB National Programs today announced a new National Advertising Division (NAD) partnership with Facebook. 

Read the Press Release

When Web Designs Turn Into Dark Patterns And What To Do About It

Jul 15, 2021, 08:00 AM by Eric D. Reicin, President & CEO, BBB National Programs
Recently I wrote about the proliferation of dark patterns and tried to give readers a sense of just how widespread these practices are. But it is not just the pervasiveness of dark patterns that has lawmakers and regulators concerned, it is the intent behind them and their impact on consumers. Nonprofit leaders, in particular, should be aware of this and how to guard against it given that they are well-positioned to garner and enhance consumer trust.

Recently I wrote about the proliferation of dark patterns and tried to give readers a sense of just how widespread these practices are. But it is not just the pervasiveness of dark patterns that has lawmakers and regulators concerned, it is the intent behind them and their impact on consumers. Nonprofit leaders, in particular, should be aware of this and how to guard against it given that they are well-positioned to garner and enhance consumer trust.

 

Defining The Problem Of Dark Patterns

Near the end of April 2021, the Federal Trade Commission hosted a highly anticipated public workshop on this topic where government, academic and private sector panelists throughout the day underscored just how effective dark patterns are at manipulating and deceiving consumers. One panelist, Professor Lior Strahilevitz, presented results from two recent studies in which he examined the effectiveness of dark patterns, such as whether "aggressive" dark patterns were more effective than "mild" ones. 

Strahilevitz concluded that it is the mild dark patterns that are the most insidious because they “significantly increased acceptance of a program with dubious benefits without generating any backlash, alienating consumers, or causing large numbers of them to log off.” Mild patterns might consist of social proof (i.e., influencing users' behavior by describing the experiences and behavior of other users) and "confirm shaming" (e.g., presenting users with a decline button that says "I do not want to protect my private information" for purchasing identity protection software).

While malicious design or ambiguous offers certainly constitute a dark pattern, artificial intelligence (AI) also plays a role in microtargeting and manipulating consumers. Today, dark patterns benefit from real-time user data and the ability to quickly change online interfaces, making them far more effective — and diabolical — than offline tricks. As another panelist, Professor Lauren Willis put it, a different iteration of "a web or app screen isn’t produced for the reasonable consumer in a neutral context, it’s created for narrow types of consumers at their most vulnerable moments." She also elaborated on this topic in her recent paper.

Just as concerning is what Strahilevitz referred to as the "differential impact" of dark patterns. He and other FTC workshop panelists noted that there is a range of factors that can make people more susceptible to dark patterns.

 

Impact Of Dark Patterns On Children

Experts also suggest that dark patterns pose a threat not only to adults but to children. Because of their limited executive functioning, Dr. Jenny Radesky explained during the same FTC workshop that children likely will follow lures and rewards.

Dona Fraser, Senior VP, Privacy Initiatives of my organization elaborated on what this may look like in practice. In a game, web designers may use popular or familiar characters to pressure a child to make purchases to unlock certain features or to complete a task. This could be done by the character expressing varying levels of disappointment, which could potentially lead to emotionally charged decisions.

The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of my organization encountered a case where a game threatened young players with the message: “Your pet is going to be taken away by the SPCA for animal neglect. Pay a fine of $6 cash to keep your pet.” In this case, CARU determined that the pet feature in the game created a sense of urgency to purchase virtual cash with real money to save the player’s virtual pet.

 

What Industry Can, And Should, Do

Based on my experience, here are a few steps nonprofit leaders can take to combat dark patterns:

  • The first step is to look inward. Think about your users’ experience and endeavor to create a transparent, ethical experience from the design of your ads to the copy on your website to the conversations with your spokespeople.
  • Understand your audience. As you modernize internal processes and acquire new tools for marketing and sales, it becomes increasingly important for you to understand if your target audience may be more susceptible to dark patterns.
  • Make sure your team is equipped to identify dark patterns and build a culture of accountability. Outside of self-assessment, consider inviting in-house experts or a third party to audit and provide proactive steps to prevent deceptive practices, intentional or otherwise.

 

I know this: When stakeholders that deeply understand the dynamics of an industry come together to collectively address a challenge, they can move in a better, transparent, more effective way forward. We have encountered similar inflection points in the past when an increasing lack of consumer trust in any industry was met with industry-wide efforts to increase transparency and hold each other accountable. 

These moments do not come every year, but when they do come, business and nonprofit leaders must be ready to work and collaborate to create meaningful industry self-regulation programs with clear accountability mechanisms, credible guidelines, and meaningful outcomes. So, let us seize this moment and further energize the various players in the technology industry to think more collaboratively about how to address the problem of dark patterns. This is something we can do — and frankly must do — if we want to enhance consumer trust in the marketplace

Originally published on Forbes.

 

 

 

Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Review Board Recommends Colgate Discontinue “Removes 10 Years of Yellow Stains” Claim for Optic White Renewal Toothpaste

New York, NY – June 17, 2021 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, has recommended that Colgate-Palmolive Company discontinue the claim that Optic White Renewal Toothpaste “removes 10 years of yellow stains” based...

Read the Decision
Decision

National Advertising Review Board Recommends Boost Mobile Discontinue “Unlimited Data” Claim for 4G LTE Data Plans

New York, NY – June 16, 2021 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, has recommended that Boost Mobile discontinue the claim “unlimited data” for its “Go Unlimited” data plans based on its determination that Boost Mobile failed to provide...

Read the Decision
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Claim that Kerasal Fungal Nail Renewal “Starts Improving Nail Appearance in Just 2 Days” Supported

New York, NY – July 21, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that Advantice provided a reasonable basis for the claim that its Kerasal Fungal Nail Renewal product “starts improving nail appearance in just 2 days.” 

Read the Decision
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Safe Catch Tuna Mercury Testing Claims Supported; Recommends Modification or Discontinuance of Certain Other Claims

New York, NY – July 20, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that Safe Catch, Inc., a manufacturer of pouched and canned tuna products sold under the brands Safe Catch Elite, Safe Catch Ahi Yellowfin Tuna, and Safe Catch Wild Albacore, provided a reasonable basis for...

Read the Decision

 

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

 

 

 

Contact Us

*Required fields