NAD Finds AT&T’s “Best Possible” Blog Post Claims Supported

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – November 19, 2020

 

The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that AT&T Services, Inc. provided a reasonable basis for its self-referential “best possible” claims made in two blog posts on AT&T’s website.

 

The AT&T blog post claims include: 

  • The “best possible Wi-Fi experience”;
  • The “best possible in-home connections”; and
  • The “best possible home internet experience.” 


The claims at issue were challenged by Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, provider of competing home internet services. 

Comcast argued that the “best possible” claims are unsupported superiority claims. 

In response to Comcast’s challenge, NAD reviewed the evidence submitted by AT&T, including a review of each claim in the context it was presented, to determine whether the claims convey a comparative superiority message or a self-referential message touting the improvements AT&T had rolled out for its customers.

NAD determined that AT&T’s July 15, 2019 blog post did not convey a comparative superiority message. NAD noted that the “best possible” statement in the context of the post clearly communicates that AT&T has optimized its own process to provide the “best possible Wi-Fi experience” AT&T can offer to its own customers. Similarly, the “best possible in-home connections” claim conveys a message about how AT&T optimizes installation of Wi-Fi equipment to provide its “best possible in-home connections,” not the best possible in-home connections compared to those provided by competing services.

NAD also determined in the context of AT&T’s January 22, 2018 blog post, the phrase “best possible home internet experience” conveys the message that AT&T is optimizing the home internet experience for its own customers with its app and Wi-Fi extenders. NAD noted that the post discusses two new features of AT&T’s home internet that improve its service relative to its prior service. Given the context of a post directed at AT&T’s service improvements, NAD did not think that a reasonable consumer reading this post would take away the message that AT&T claimed the best home internet experience compared to all other internet service providers.

NAD found that the advertiser had a reasonable basis for the self-referential messages conveyed by the two blog posts.

In its advertiser’s statement, AT&T expressed that it was pleased with NAD’s findings and stated that “we strongly support the self-regulatory process, and we appreciate NAD’s careful reasoning in this matter.”

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.    

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand

New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.

Read the Decision Summary