Boehm-Ritter’s Direct Response Advertising Referred To Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – July 29, 2005 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP), announced that it will refer advertising disseminated by Boehm-Ritter, Inc., marketers of Nexiderm-SP Anti-Wrinkle Formula, to the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). The truth and accuracy of the marketer’s claims came to the attention of ERSP through an anonymous complaint.

The core claims that were identified in the Nexiderm-SP online advertising were: a) permanency claims (i.e., “Erase fine lines and wrinkles.”); b) establishment claims (i.e. “The chief ingredient of Nexiderm-SP is Matrixyl…clinically shown to decrease wrinkle volume, decrease wrinkle density, and decrease [the] visual appearance of wrinkles while increase…the skin’s synthesis of collagen.”); c) safety claims (i.e.
“Nexiderm-SP is formulated to safely and effectively erases wrinkles and fine lines from all areas of the skin, hands and face.”); d) comparative claims (i.e. “Nexiderm offers IMPROVEMENT of fine lines and wrinkles. Botox requires a maintenance schedule of regular, expensive treatments.”); and e) testimonials (i.e. “I have used both Collagen and Botox injections and the results of Nexiderm-SP completely surpass their results!”).

Pursuant to the ERSP Procedures, after failing to respond to ERSP’s original inquiry within fifteen calendar days, the direct response marketer was afforded a second ten-day period in which to submit a substantive response. The marketer failed to meet this second deadline and pursuant to section 2.6 (B) of the ERSP Policies and Procedures, this inquiry has been referred to the FTC in order to address concerns regarding the truthfulness and accuracy of the Nexiderm-SP direct response advertisement.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary