CARU Examines Ad for Dirty South Bat’s W.A.R. Product; Recommends Advertiser Modify, Discontinue Claims
New York, NY – Sept. 21, 2016 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) has determined that claims made in testimonials for Dirty South Bat’s W.A.R. baseball bats should be modified or discontinued.
CARU, an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation, monitors advertising directed to children in all media and across all platforms. CARU is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
A print advertisement for Dirty South Bats, manufactured by Dirty South Bats Ltd., appeared in Baseball Youth magazine and came to CARU’s attention through CARU’s routine routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.
At issue were the following claims, made in testimonials:
- “My 8 year old is using Dirty South Bat W.A.R. … he is hitting the fence at 210ft!!!! Love these, have several other brands, but he won’t use anything else!” …Kristi, FL
- “Picked up 2 W.A.R. bats for our 11U team. They are awesome! Only wish we could afford more for the entire team and they’d be dominant! So glad and proud to have something made in our won backyard.”… Steve, GA
Following its review, CARU determined that a child who viewed the advertisement could believe that using the bat would allow a player to hit a baseball 210 feet and ensure victory for the child’s team.
Given the absence of evidence in the record to support either claim, CARU recommended
that the advertiser either discontinue the claim, “he is hitting the fence at 210ft!” or clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected performance for the average child using the W.A.R bat.
CARU also recommended that the advertiser discontinue the statement, “Only wish we could afford more for the entire team and they’d be dominant!” in its advertising directed to children.
Dirty South Bats, in its advertiser’s statement, said that the company “agrees that for future advertising directed to children it will qualify its endorsement claims where necessary and will also ensure that any future endorsements meet the criteria outlined in CARU’s decision.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...