CARU Finds Advertising For Bandai’s “Megazord” Does Not Mislead Children

New York – August 11, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that advertising for the Samurai Megazord, advertised by Bandai America Incorporated, did not mislead children about the product’s performance.

Broadcast advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The advertising at issue depicts three boys playing with “zords,” smaller component that can be combined to build a “Megazord – the ultimate fighting machine.”  The advertising features shots of the Megazord pivoting as it wields a sword. In one shot, a small part of child’s thumb is visible as he manipulates the Megazord. In a second shot, a child’s hand is mostly obscured is behind the Megazord.

CARU questioned whether children viewing the commercial could take away the impression that the Megazord moves on its own.

CARU’s Guidance on Advertising Depicting Movement of Stationary Toys (“Toy Guidance”) states, “to avoid misleading children, commercials for toys that do not move on their own, but that are depicted as moving, should clearly and conspicuously demonstrate how the toys are made to move.”

After carefully reviewing the commercial, CARU determined a child viewing the commercial would not expect that the toy would move on its own.  CARU based its determination on the fact that the initial shot showing the two hands building the Megazord was clear and conspicuous, the standard for depicting movement in CARU’s Toy Guidance.

Bandai, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “is committed to ensuring its advertising is not deceptive, unfair or inappropriate for intended audience.  We appreciate CARU’s efforts in promoting responsible children’s advertising and strive to uphold the CARU guidelines in all of our advertising efforts.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary