CARU Finds Advertising For Bandai’s “Megazord” Does Not Mislead Children

New York – August 11, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that advertising for the Samurai Megazord, advertised by Bandai America Incorporated, did not mislead children about the product’s performance.

Broadcast advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The advertising at issue depicts three boys playing with “zords,” smaller component that can be combined to build a “Megazord – the ultimate fighting machine.”  The advertising features shots of the Megazord pivoting as it wields a sword. In one shot, a small part of child’s thumb is visible as he manipulates the Megazord. In a second shot, a child’s hand is mostly obscured is behind the Megazord.

CARU questioned whether children viewing the commercial could take away the impression that the Megazord moves on its own.

CARU’s Guidance on Advertising Depicting Movement of Stationary Toys (“Toy Guidance”) states, “to avoid misleading children, commercials for toys that do not move on their own, but that are depicted as moving, should clearly and conspicuously demonstrate how the toys are made to move.”

After carefully reviewing the commercial, CARU determined a child viewing the commercial would not expect that the toy would move on its own.  CARU based its determination on the fact that the initial shot showing the two hands building the Megazord was clear and conspicuous, the standard for depicting movement in CARU’s Toy Guidance.

Bandai, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “is committed to ensuring its advertising is not deceptive, unfair or inappropriate for intended audience.  We appreciate CARU’s efforts in promoting responsible children’s advertising and strive to uphold the CARU guidelines in all of our advertising efforts.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary