CARU Finds Commercial That Aired on Disney Channel Was in Compliance with CARU Guidelines
New York, NY – April 21, 2017 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) has determined that a commercial for Mattel’s “Minnie’s Sparkle n’ Spin Fashion Bow-tique” didn’t contravene CARU’s guidelines on the blurring of advertising and program content.
CARU, an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation, monitors advertising directed to children in all media and across all platforms. CARU is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
The advertising at issue aired on Disney Channel and CARU was initially concerned that the commercial, featuring Minnie Mouse and friends, appeared adjacent to a television program in which the same characters appeared and may present concerns of blurring between advertising and editorial/program content. Host Selling Rules set by the Federal Communications Commission under the Children’s Television Act of 1990 (CTA) prohibit airing commercial content featuring a character during or adjacent to a children’s program that features the same character.
In response to CARU’s inquiry, Disney Channel noted that the FCC has acknowledged short segment programming as “programming” for purposes of applying general limits to the amount of commercial content that could be aired during children’s programming under the CTA.
In this case, Disney said, the Mattel ad aired after unrelated short-form content – Molang and Big Block SingSong. Both short features were bracketed with five second bumpers at the open and close of the program to further delineate them as program content. The Mattel commercial also aired from four to six minutes after the character-related program.
After reviewing the commercial and all of the evidence in the record, CARU determined that in this case, the short-form programming was sufficient to separate commercial material from the related program content.
Disney, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “takes its obligations with respect to children’s programming seriously and is pleased with CARU’s decision.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...