CARU Finds Computer-Generated Imagery In Jakks ‘Fly Wheels’ Advertising Does Not Mislead Consumers

New York, NY – August 10,  2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has determined that computer-general imagery (CGI) in television advertising for Jakks Pacific “FlyWheels 2.0,” does not mislead child viewers. CARU has recommended, however, that the advertiser modify the commercial to better depict adult supervision.

The advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, though its routine monitoring practices. 

The 30-second commercial opens with a shot of the product, which is composed of a base handle, a launch cord and a wheel.  A child holds the handle and pulls the launch cord, sending the wheel flying through the air. The commercial features sequences of children in different environments playing with the products; in a street, in a field, and on a racetrack, using a stunt ramp to make the toy jump over a car, a truck and an airplane. As the wheels fly over each vehicle, a blue computer generated image marks the trail each toy travels. A small, white video super flashes on the screen each time the graphic is shown, which states “Simulated Trail Graphic.”

What appears to be an adult is shown briefly standing behind the children in three shots and there is a quick audio disclosure at the end of the commercial, which states “Adult supervision required.”

Upon its initial inquiry, CARU questioned whether children could be misled as to the toy’s performance capabilities because the advertisement features CGI and whether the advertisement adequately depicted adult supervision.

Following its review, CARU determined that the CGI featured in the commercial served as a visual aid to focus viewers’ attention on the toy and would not mislead children as to the toy’s performance capabilities.

CARU further determined, however, that the advertisement did not adequately depict adult supervision. CARU noted in its decision that the toy is capable of flying at high speeds and, depending on where it is aimed, could easily hit a child and cause injury. CARU noted that the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined that flying toys are the cause of the second highest number of injuries to young children. 

JAKKS Pacific, in its advertiser’s statement, said it was “glad that CARU agrees that JAKKS did not in any way mislead children with our use of computer-generated imagery in our FlyWheels 2.0 commercial.”

The company said that it disagreed with CARU’s findings regarding the depiction of adult supervision, but will “continue to develop and refine our rigorous commercial development review process in conformance with (CARU’s) Principles and Guidelines … .”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary