CARU Finds Fischer Price “Power Wheels Ford F-150” Advertising Adequately Depicts Adult Supervision

New York, NY – April 1, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that television advertising for the Power Wheels Ford F-150 Truck, marketed by Fisher Price, adequately depicts the need for adult supervision. 

The advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU through its routine monitoring practices.  

The commercial featured two children driving a Power Wheels Ford F-150 Truck. The commercial featured an adult male throwing a bag into the bed of his truck and then turning around to look at the children as they mimicked his actions and put a bag into the bed of their toy truck.  As the boys drove away in the vehicle, the passenger turned around and waved to the adult. The advertisement also included a voiceover and a written super stating that “parental supervision is required.”   

CARU’s guidelines on “Unsafe and Inappropriate Advertising to Children” state that advertisers should take into account that children are prone to exploration, imitation and experimentation and may imitate product demonstrations or other activities depicted in advertisements without regard to risk. Further, the guidelines note that when an activity would be unsafe without adult supervision, supervision should be depicted. 

Following its review of the advertising at issue, CARU determined that the advertising provided a meaningful depiction of adult supervision. The back-to-back scenes of supervision, with the adult observing the children’s actions and the child waving to the adult, demonstrated a sense of constant supervision and understanding of this supervision by the child.  This continuity served to strengthen the take-away message for viewers that adult supervision is required. 

Fisher-Price, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “appreciates the opportunity to participate in the self-regulatory process.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

NAD Finds Certain Claims for Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks Supported or Outside NAD’s Jurisdiction; Recommends General Mills Discontinue or Modify Other Claims

New York, NY – November 25, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that General Mills discontinue or modify certain express and implied claims regarding the fruit and vegetable content of Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks and the nutritional benefits of those ingredients.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge, Drip Hydration Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for its Ketamine IV Therapy

New York, NY – November 22, 2024 – Following a challenge brought by the National Advertising Division as part of its routine monitoring program, Drip Hydration voluntarily discontinued advertising claims for its Drip Hydration Ketamine IV Therapy.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NAD Finds Patented and Safety Claims for POOPH’s Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator Supported; Recommends Other Claims Be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – November 21, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ikigai supported patented and safety claims for their POOPH Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator, but recommended that other claims, including claims that POOPH eliminates odors and strains, be discontinued.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends SharkNinja Discontinue Certain Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Claims

New York, NY – November 19, 2024 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that SharkNinja discontinue the claim “The Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Among Full-Sized Deep Carpet Cleaners** Based on ASTM F2828 vs. full-sized carpet cleaners above 14 lbs.”     

Read the Decision Summary