CARU Recommends Big Time Toys Modify “Dippin Dots” Ads To Better Disclose Items Included With Initial Purchase; Company Agrees Does So

New York – Jan. 28, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Big Time Toys modify broadcast advertising for the “Dippin Dots Frozen Dot Maker,” to better disclose the items included with the initial purchase. The company has done so. 

The broadcast advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children. 

The commercial opened with several children dancing around the Dot Maker machine as the following jingle plays: “Dippin’ Dots they’re a taste sensation.  Lots of fun, lots of taste sensations.” 

The commercial featured two children using the Dot Maker machine as the announcer stated, “Pick a flavor you really like a lot then create your own frozen dots.  Chocolate, vanilla, strawberry, banana split, cookies’n’cream, cotton candy … .” 

As the announcer listed flavors, three packages of Dippin’ Dots Flavor Packs danced over a child’s head. The commercial closed with a shot of the Dot Maker, two templates, four bowls, two pens, and three trays. 

Underneath the shot, a very small white super stated, “Flavor Packs Sold Separately.” 

After reviewing the product and advertising, CARU was concerned that children might believe that the Flavor Packs were included in the purchase of the Dot Maker. 

In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser said it would modify the advertising to address CARU’s concerns. The company did so by adding a clear and understandable audio disclosure stating, “Flavor packs sold separately.” 

CARU noted in its decision that the advertiser acted expeditiously to address concerns. Big Time Toys, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “agrees with the principles that CARU operates on. Their feedback ultimately made our commercial better.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary