CARU Recommends Build-A-Bear Modify Website to Address Privacy Concerns; Company Does So

New York, NY – May 14, 2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit recommended that Build-a-Bear Inc., operator of Buildabear.com, install a neutral age-screening mechanism at the site and eliminate links to the adult-directed sites Pinterest and Twitter that do not age screen. The company said it will do so.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU monitors websites for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on Online Privacy Protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Advertisers must obtain prior “verifiable parental consent” when they collect personal information from children under the age of 13, including email addresses or phone numbers.

Children are directed to Buildabear.com by a television advertisement that references the website.

At Buildabear.com, visitors can create an account that allows them to play bear-themed games, download desktop themes and shop for Build-A-Bear merchandise. To create an account, visitors must enter an email address, password and birthdate. CARU noted during its initial review of the site that children under the age of 13 who wanted to register for an account could circumvent the age-screening mechanism by hitting the back button.

Elsewhere on the site, CARU noted, were links to other areas of the Internet – Twitter and Pinterest – that are directed to adults and do not age-screen.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, the company said that a session cookie designed to prevent visitors from circumventing the age-screening process had been inadvertently overwritten and had since been restored.

Further, the company said it would remove links to Twitter and Pinterest from the site’s front page.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “shares CARU’s goals for ensuring children’s safety and privacy on the Internet and thanks CARU for bringing these issues to its attention. Build-A-Bear Workshop welcomed this opportunity to work with CARU and is pleased with the satisfactory conclusion of CARU’s inquiry.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary