CARU Recommends Build A Bear Workshop Modify Future Advertising to Clarify Pricing

New York, NY –Nov. 14, 2008 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended Build-A-Bear Workshop (BABW)  modify or discontinue price advertising claims that may confuse child consumers.

Television advertising for BABW came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The commercial in question depicted a child at a BABW store, selecting a stuffed monkey, clothing and accessories. The announcer states, “You can make a new furry friend starting at $10.00 and continue the adventure online for free at Buildabear.com.”

The commercial closes with a shot of a bear.  The bear initially appears without clothing or accessories but within seconds is wearing a shirt, shorts, aviator sunglasses and sneakers.  There is a large video super at the bottom of the island shot which states, “Animals starting at $10.00.” 

CARU concluded that a child could reasonably believe that any fully clothed and accessorized animal would cost $10, although the monkey depicted cost $18 and outfitting the animal similar to the one depicted would cost approximately $40. Accordingly, CARU recommended that the advertiser clarify any reference to price in future advertising to include mention of the purchase of additional clothing and accessories.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser noted that the advertising in question was no longer running and that no additional air time for the commercial had been purchased.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said CARU’s concerns would be considered in future advertising. Further, the company said, it “reiterates its commitment to the goals of the CARU and will continue to develop its advertising in conformity with its understanding of CARU Guidelines.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary