CARU Recommends Crayola Add Audio Disclosure To Advertising For Its ‘Color Explosion 3d’

New York, NY – May 27, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that Crayola include an audio disclosure to broadcast advertising for its “Color Explosion 3-D” product to better assure that children understand what is included in the initial purchase.

The advertising at issue came to the attention of the CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The “Color Explosion” product comes in two versions, one with standard size black paper, and one with wider black paper.  Both versions include the paper, special markers, and 3-D glasses with which to view the finished pictures.  The only difference between the two versions is the size of the paper included.

The commercial featured children creating designs on the black paper with “Color Explosion Board Tip Markers.”  The final screen shot features both versions of the product, each in a separate box.  The shot also featured a pad and paper, four markers, and the 3-D glasses. At the bottom of the screen was a small visual disclosure – in gray type against a white background – that stated, “each sold separately.” 

It is well-established that an advertiser is responsible for all reasonable interpretations of its claims and not just the messages it intended to convey.  After carefully reviewing the advertisement, CARU determined that one reasonable take away message was that the two different paper sizes depicted in the commercial were included in the purchase of one set. 

CARU further determined that the super did not sufficiently convey to a child audience that it was necessary to purchase both sets to receive both paper sizes. 

Further, CARU noted, it has routinely held that an audio voiceover should accompany a written disclosure in advertisements directed to children, because younger children may not be able to read or otherwise understand a written disclosure.

CARU recommended that a separate audio disclosure be added to inform children that the standard paper version and the wide paper version must be purchased separately. 

Crayola, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company appreciated the opportunity to participate in the CARU process.  The company noted that although it “views the facts and circumstances of the instant case differently than CARU,” it will take CARU’s decision into account if it plans to re-run the advertisement.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary