CARU Recommends Glow Crazy Modify Advertising to Better Disclose Material Information; Company Agrees to Do So

New York, NY – June 7, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Glow Crazy, which markets the Glow Crazy glow wand, modify its advertising to include the necessary disclosure that batteries are not included.

 Broadcast and Internet advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s ongoing monitoring of advertising directed to children.

 The advertising at issue featured children playing with the glow-in-the-dark product. Broadcast advertising directed viewers to the product’s official Website, www.GlowCrazy.com. Neither the television nor Website advertising contains a disclosure stating that the product requires batteries and/or that batteries are not included.  The actual product packaging states, “Requires 4 AAA Batteries (Not Included).”

 CARU was concerned that the advertising at issue did not disclose that the product required batteries and that batteries were not included.

 In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser said that it recognized the absence of disclosures and would modify the advertising to address CARU’s concerns.

 Glow Crazy, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “accepts CARU’s decision and has agreed to include both written and audio versions of material disclosures such as “batteries not included,” in its advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary