CARU Recommends Hampton Direct Modify Broadcast Ad for ‘Lumi Dough,’ Company Agrees to Do So
New York, NY – Aug. 7, 2014 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that Hampton Direct modify broadcast advertising for the company’s “Lumi Dough” product to better disclose to children the products included in an initial purchase. The company has agreed to do so.
CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
CARU monitors advertising to children in all media. CARU also examines websites and apps for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising – which includes guidelines on online privacy protection – as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
Lumi Dough is a luminous silicone product for children ages four and up. Lumi Dough stretches like rubber and molds like dough. A package of Lumi Dough comes with five sheets of glowing dough in clear, green, pink, purple, blue and black. However, CARU noted, the advertising at issue feature molded creations in colors that also included orange, yellow, sky blue, purple, black and white and appeared to feature more projects than could reasonably been made with five sheets of the product.
After carefully considering all the evidence in the record, CARU concluded that the commercial did not clearly communicate what comes with an initial purchase of Lumi Dough. CARU recommended the company modify its advertising to make clear what comes with an initial purchase of the advertised product.
Hampton Direct, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company values CARU’s role “administering and monitoring advertising directed towards children keeping in mind the ‘vulnerability and susceptibility’ of children. We respect the CARU Guidelines. Accordingly, in this case, we accept CARU’s decision in its entirety and agree to modify our advertising.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...