CARU Recommends Innovation First More Clearly Disclose Information Material To Child Consumers; Company Agrees To Do So

New York, NY – Sept.  20, 2010 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has determined that broadcast advertising for Innovation First Labs, Inc.’s “Hexbug Nanos” did not adequately disclose which items are included with the initial purchase of the product.

The advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The Hexbug Nano is a small “battery powered robot,” that moves quickly on 12 rubber legs. Nanos are available in many colors.

The advertising at issue featured shots of children playing with multiple Nanos. In one shot, hundreds of vibrating Nanos were shown clustered together, as the voiceover stated “swarming now at Target.” A disclosure at the bottom of screen stated “each sold separately.”

CARU questioned whether the written disclosure, absent an accompanying audio disclosure, was adequate to alert child consumers that each Nano is sold separately.

CARU concluded that the advertising at issue could lead child consumers to believe that they would receive multiple Nanos with their initial purchase, although that is not the case. CARU recommended that the advertiser add a separate audio disclosure to inform children that the  Nanos were each sold separately. 

CARU noted in its decision that it has routinely held that an audio voiceover should accompany a written disclosure in advertisements directed to children because younger children may not be able to read or otherwise understand a written disclosure.

Innovation First, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “supports the self-regulatory process, has agreed with CARU to include audio disclosures in future airings of the subject advertisement and will continue to take CARU’s guidelines into consideration in future commercials.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary