CARU Recommends JAKKS Pacific Modify Broadcast Advertising to Better Disclose that Dolls Do Not Move on Their Own

New York, NY – June 19, 2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that JAKKS Pacific, Inc., modify broadcast advertising for the Winx Club Harmonix Dolls to better to disclose to a child audience that the dolls do not move on their own.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

A television advertisement for the Winx Club Harmonix Dolls came to the attention of the CARU through CARU’s ongoing monitoring of advertising directed to children.

To avoid misleading children, CARU stated in its decision, commercials for toys that do not move on their own, but that are depicted as moving, should clearly and conspicuously demonstrate how the toys are made to move. The demonstration should be of sufficient length and clarity that children viewing the commercial take away a clear understanding of how the toy operates in the real world during real play.

In this case, CARU noted the overall minimal use of hand movement throughout the commercial. For the majority of the advertisement, there were no hands or fingers shown, although there were several shots where the dolls appear to move independently, including turning their heads from side to side and standing without visible support.
Accordingly, CARU recommended that the advertiser include more shots of visible hand manipulation to avoid a misleading impression that the dolls can move and stand on their own.

JAKKS, in its advertiser’s statement, said that “while it believed hand manipulation was present, it appreciated CARU’s requests that more hands should be visible.”

The company said that the spot has been discontinued, but if it is run again, the company will implement changes to assure that hand manipulation is more prominent.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary