CARU Recommends Kidz Bop Modify Website To Better Protect Children’s Privacy; Company Agrees To Do So

New York, NY – June 24, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that Kidz Bop LLC take steps to better protect the online safety of  children who visit the company’s Website at www.kidzbop.com.

The site came to the attention of CARU through a consumer complaint. Kidz Bop is the name of a series of popular music albums recorded for children and sold by Kidz Bop LLC.  Website features amateur music videos from child fans, as well polls, information about Kidz Bop products, online games, a newsletter and e-cards.

During its initial review of the site, CARU discovered that the Kidz Bop site included link to a mobile marketing Website operated by a second company, Gameloft. A review of the Gameloft site, which CARU determined was not in compliance with CARU’s guidelines, including guidelines that address online privacy protection.

Further, CARU determined that the Kidz Bop Privacy Policy did not include the operator’s contact information as required by the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act COPPA.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, Kidz Bop asserted that it was unaware of the Gameloft advertisement, which was placed on the Website by Kidz Bop’s exclusive advertising agent, Gorilla Nation (Gorilla).  According to Kidz Bop, Gorilla will comply with its contractual obligation to exercise its reasonable best efforts to ensure that no advertisements on Kidz Bop’s Website contains links to content that is contrary to public policy or otherwise is unlawful.

Further, the operator agreed to include corporate contact information in the Website’s privacy policy to address CARU’s concern.

CARU noted in its decision that it is pleased Kidz Bop has made modifications to the site.

The company, in its operator’s statement, said that “Kidz Bop LLC believes that maintaining online privacy for children is an extremely important goal. CARU’s efforts in assisting the industry in meeting this goal are invaluable. We are happy to cooperate with CARU to ensure that www.kidzbop.com complies with CARU’s Guidelines and COPPA, and pleased with the satisfactory conclusion of this inquiry.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary