CARU Recommends Kraft Foods Modify Sweepstakes Advertising To Better Disclose Free Means Of Entry, Chance Of Winning
New York, NY – Sept. 30, 2010 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Kraft Foods modify online advertising for the “Ultimate Field Trip,” a sweepstakes promotion for the advertiser’s Lunchables product to better disclose the free means of entry and the likelihood of winning.
The advertising came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.
The advertising, which appeared on the Nickelodeon Website and linked to the advertiser’s Website, featured a red bus bearing the sign “ULTIMATE FIELD TRIP.” A voiceover stated, “this bus is your ticket to the ultimate field trip! Ultimate means your chance to go to the Kennedy Space Center, San Diego Zoo, or the Georgia Aquarium … or you could win the first prize, $150 for “your own awesome field trip.”
Listeners were instructed to “just find a code inside specially marked packages of Lunchables, go to www.lunchables.com and follow the directions to see where the bus takes you!” A written disclosure at the bottom of the screen stated, “No purchase necessary.”
Clicking on the advertisement took visitors to the advertiser’s Website, where they could click on an “Enter Now,” icon.
Following its review of the advertising at issue, CARU determined that Website visitors who heard the voiceover might conclude that they must purchase the product to enter the sweepstakes. CARU determined that neither the written disclosure nor the “Enter Now” icon at the advertiser’s site provided adequate information about the free means of entry. CARU recommended the advertiser CARU recommends that the Advertiser employ the use of an audible disclosure stating “no purchase necessary.” CARU further recommended the advertiser employ the use of an audio disclosure such as “many will enter, few will win,” to clearly describe a child’s likelihood of winning.
In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser agreed to revise the spot as recommended.
The company, in its advertiser’s statement said, CARU’s recommendations “will provide guidance going forward with respect to future executions. As strong supporters of CARU and its mission, we are grateful for this opportunity to work with you for the mutual benefit of CARU and Kraft.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.