CARU Recommends LEGO Modify Future Advertising for ‘Pirate Ship Ambush’ to Better Disclose What Comes with Initial Purchase

New York, NY – Dec. 5, 2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that LEGO Systems, Inc., modify future advertising for the “Lord of the Rings Pirate Ship Ambush” to make clear which products come with the initial purchase.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Broadcast advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s ongoing monitoring of advertising directed to children.

In this case, CARU had to determine whether children could be misled by viewing a 30-second commercial that featured the LEGO Lord of the Rings Pirate Ship depicted alongside several mini-figurines that were not included in an initial purchase of the advertised playset.

After reviewing the commercial, CARU determined that the commercial did not clearly communicate what comes with the initial purchase of the playset. Instead, CARU found that one message conveyed to the child audience was that the playset included more product than it actually did.

Although CARU acknowledged that it is not uncommon in children’s advertising to show additional items that are sold separately, in order to avoid confusion, CARU has consistently required advertisers to clearly disclose which products must be purchased separately like accessories or individual items in a collection. Because there were no disclosures clarifying what was included with the playset, CARU held that a child could reasonably believe that all of the product shown is included with the playset.

The LEGO Group, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “appreciates the ongoing efforts of CARU to ensure appropriate advertising to children, and as a CARU member since its’ inception, we fully support these endeavors and make every effort to ensure our advertising conforms to the CARU Guidelines.

“We will continue to keep CARU’s concerns and guidelines in mind as we develop new commercials, as always,” the company said.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Unilever Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Degree Advanced Antiperspirant

New York, NY – May 8, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Unilever discontinue claims that Degree Advanced completely prevents underarm sweat and sweat marks during intense exercise sessions, discontinue their side-by-side comparison with Old spice, and modify its "Samuel" commercial. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Lemongrass Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Claims

McLean, VA – May 6, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Lemongrass Spa Products modify or discontinue certain earnings and health-related product performance claims. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary