CARU Recommends Mattel Modify Barbie Sparkle Blast App to Better Disclose In-App Advertising; Company Does So

New York, NY –  Sept. 12, 2017  – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that Mattel, Inc., modify its Barbie Sparkle Blast mobile application to better disclose to a child audience the company’s in-app advertising. Mattel has done so.

CARU, an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation, monitors advertising directed to children in all media and across all platforms.

The Barbie Sparkle Blast mobile application came to CARU’s attention through CARU’s routine monitoring practices.

As CARU noted in its decision, the app’s description in the Apple App store states that Barbie Sparkle Blast is suitable for children and adults. The app features simple games for players, in which they match like-toned jewels. When players successfully complete the game, they unlock new game features and are rewarded with virtual currency in the form of gems. Players can use their gems to purchase a variety of virtual clothing to dress their Barbie avatar, change Barbie’s outfit depending on what she has in her virtual closet and purchase virtual gems with real money through in-app purchases.

Advertisements in the form of short videos run during game play when players transfer from one game level to the next. Once an ad begins, it cannot be stopped and users cannot exit the screen. Players can also collect additional gems by choosing to watch sponsored videos. In the top right corner of the home screen, there is a glowing icon that says “Watch Advert. Free Gems.” When a user chooses this option, a screen appears which says “Don’t miss out! Watch a video and receive a reward! 1 Gem!” If the user chooses this option, she is rewarded with one gem for each video she watches. The least expensive item in the clothing “store” costs 45 gems.

Upon initial review, CARU questioned whether the app clearly and understandably disclosed, as required by the Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, that the videos are advertisements.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, Mattel said that it has taken measures to assure that child-directed advertising is identifiable as such in instances where it may not otherwise be clear to a child and that it would add a disclosure to all advertising present within the app.

Mattel said that it previously believed that third-party ad-serving companies would include an advertising designation in ads served to children; however, since that process did not prove to be reliable, the company added “Watch a video Ad and receive a reward!” on a pop-up screen within the app before a child-directed commercial video is offered. As a further reminder, the button a child clicks to watch the video now reads “Watch Ad Now” instead of simply “Watch Now.”

Mattel also explained that the term “advert” is commonly used internationally to indicate that the content contains an advertisement. However, the company said, it appreciates the advantages of consistent industry terminology and has substituted the word “ad” instead. The company, Mattel said, supports the CARU process.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary