CARU Recommends McDonald’s Modify, Discontinue “SpongeBob” Spot

New York, NY – Jan. 3,  2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that McDonald’s Corporation discontinuing advertising for its Happy Meal product that emphasizes the toy available with each meal, rather than the meal itself.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry system of self-regulation and is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU’s guidelines require that when advertising contains a premium message, it should focus the child’s attention primarily on the product. The premium message should be made secondary.

In this case, CARU determined that a 30-second television commercial for a McDonald’s Happy Meal that included SpongeBob SquarePants toys – 16 toys in all – did not adequately distinguish between the product and the premium. In making its determination, CARU considered that the focus of the commercial was on SpongeBob SquarePants, the central character in a long running children’s television show. CARU noted in its decision that the show’s theme played through the commercial and clips from the show were woven into the advertisement.

By contrast, the food sold in a Happy Meal appeared briefly and was mentioned only once during the commercial.

CARU determined that the commercial in its entirety, including the audio and visual components, focused children’s attention primarily on the SpongeBob SquarePants premium and only secondarily on the product. CARU recommended the advertiser modify or discontinue the spot.

McDonald’s, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company values the self-regulatory process and will take CARU’s comments into consideration in future ads.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary