CARU Recommends MGAE Modify Advertising For ‘Rescue Pets’ To Better Depict Adult Supervision; Company Agrees To Do So

 New York, NY – August 12, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that MGA Entertainment modify advertising for the “Rescue Pets Swim to Me Puppy” to better depict adult supervision of children in a swimming pool.

Television advertising for the toy came to the attention of CARU through its routine monitoring for advertising directed to children. The 30-second commercial features children playing with their “Rescue Pets” – plastic toys that can both swim and walk – in a pool. The commercial featured three brief shots of a woman in the background, reading a book. There were no audio disclosures or supers that stated adult supervision was required. Both the product packaging and the “quick start” and “safety instructions” sections of the product manual stated: “CAUTION: DO NOT ALLOW CHILDREN TO PLAY IN WATER WITHOUT ADULT SUPERVISION.”

CARU strives to assure that advertising directed to children is truthful and accurate, and that it conveys the appropriate safety message when children are shown participating in activities that present the risk of harm.

Following its review of the commercial, CARU determined that the commercial did not adequately depict adult supervision. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify future advertising for “Rescue Pets” to visually depict prominent adult supervision and include a voiceover stating “adult supervision required.”  The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it was “disappointed” with CARU’s decision. However, the company noted, “children’s safety is our utmost concern and we remain committed to depicting our products in a manner consistent with applicable advertising guidelines. Should we elect to air the … commercial again, we will make the appropriate modifications to this commercial.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary