CARU Recommends MGAE Modify Advertising For ‘Rescue Pets’ To Better Depict Adult Supervision; Company Agrees To Do So

 New York, NY – August 12, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that MGA Entertainment modify advertising for the “Rescue Pets Swim to Me Puppy” to better depict adult supervision of children in a swimming pool.

Television advertising for the toy came to the attention of CARU through its routine monitoring for advertising directed to children. The 30-second commercial features children playing with their “Rescue Pets” – plastic toys that can both swim and walk – in a pool. The commercial featured three brief shots of a woman in the background, reading a book. There were no audio disclosures or supers that stated adult supervision was required. Both the product packaging and the “quick start” and “safety instructions” sections of the product manual stated: “CAUTION: DO NOT ALLOW CHILDREN TO PLAY IN WATER WITHOUT ADULT SUPERVISION.”

CARU strives to assure that advertising directed to children is truthful and accurate, and that it conveys the appropriate safety message when children are shown participating in activities that present the risk of harm.

Following its review of the commercial, CARU determined that the commercial did not adequately depict adult supervision. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify future advertising for “Rescue Pets” to visually depict prominent adult supervision and include a voiceover stating “adult supervision required.”  The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it was “disappointed” with CARU’s decision. However, the company noted, “children’s safety is our utmost concern and we remain committed to depicting our products in a manner consistent with applicable advertising guidelines. Should we elect to air the … commercial again, we will make the appropriate modifications to this commercial.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary