CARU Recommends Nickelodeon Modify Broadcast Advertising to Better Disclose Odds of Winning ‘SpongeBob’ Sweepstakes

New York, NY – May 23, 2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that Nickelodeon modify broadcast advertising for a “SpongeBob” Splashpants Sweepstakes to better disclose the odds of winning.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Television advertising for the SpongeBob Splashpants Sweepstakes, marketed by Nickelodeon, came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The commercial, which aired during children’s programming, directed children to a sweepstakes website where they would see a sign for the “SpongeBob SplashPants Sweepstakes.”

Below the sign was a video of the commercial for the limited edition SpongeBob Pirate’s Booty snacks, with descriptions of the sweepstakes prizes, as follows:
“1 Grand Prize: Set sail from New York on Norwegian Cruise Line’s newest ship, Norwegian Breakaway, for an action-packed vacation with Nickelodeon and SpongeBob. Dive into the SpongeBob-themed water area and dine with your favorite yellow sponge at the Pajama Jam Breakfast.

First Prize: 50 first-prize winners will win one DVD from the SpongeBob Squarepants Super Square Collection!”

CARU questioned whether the odds of winning were clearly disclosed during the commercial or on the website and recommended that the company modify the advertising to
include an audio voiceover in the commercial as well as a visual disclosure on its website, which will explicitly state the odds of winning.

Nickelodeon, in response to CARU’s concerns, said that it accepted CARU’s decision and has stopped airing the spot.  “Moving forward, Nickelodeon will ensure that sweepstakes promotions include the odds of winning in prominent and clear ways,” the company said.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary