CARU Recommends Pulse Performance Products Modify Website, Advertising Claims For Scooter

New York, NY – Dec. 3,  2008 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Pulse Performance Products modify or discontinue certain advertising for the company’s Kick N’ Go scooter and modify its Website to better protect children’s privacy. The company has agreed to do so.

CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, examines advertising directed to children under 12 in all media and monitors Websites for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on Online Privacy Protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).

CARU examined broadcast advertising for the Pulse Kick N’ Go scooter (Kick N’ Go), marketed by Pulse Performance Products. The commercial came to CARU’s attention through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.  The advertising in question directed viewers to visit the company’s Website, www.pulsekickngo.com, where children could sign up to join the “Pulse Team.” 

The commercial opens with a boy riding a Kick N’ Go scooter down a residential street while several children cheer him on.

An announcer states, “Part rocket… part science… part kid.  Introducing the Pulse Kick ‘N Go, loaded with turbo fastronomic kick ‘n go technology, which means… the more you kick it, the more it screams.  You can get your Pulse Kick ‘N Go today.  For more information, go to pulsekickngo.com. ”

The advertisement contains alternate shots of the boy riding in slow motion, real time and what appeared to be high speed photography accompanied by sound effects that create the illusion of speed.  At the bottom of a screen is a disclosure stating, “Visual and sound effects used.”

The Pulse Website provided information and videos  about the Kick N’ Go scooter and other Pulse products.  An area called “The Pulse Zone” allowed visitors to play games and submit product related comments and videos.  

A video labeled, “Pulse Street Team Cruise,” featured three boys riding Kick N’ Go scooters on the sidewalk and on the street in a residential neighborhood.  The video appeared to be shot using real time photography and did not contain sound effects.

The Website also allowed visitors to join the “Pulse Team” and receive emails about product information and contests.  To sign-up, a user had to supply first name and email address.  Below it stated,

“I certify that I am at least 13 years of age and have read the Pulse Online Safety Policy for Kids and Terms & Conditions.”

CARU questioned whether the advertisement created the impression that the scooter goes faster than it actually does; whether it is safe and appropriate to depict children riding scooters in the street and whether the product Website collected email addresses from children under 13 without providing proper notice to parents. 

After reviewing the net impression of the advertisement, CARU concluded that one reasonable take away message conveyed to children was that the scooter would perform as fast as the one shown in the advertisement.  CARU recommended an audio disclosure to inform children that special effects were used to achieve the appearance of speed.

With regards to safety, CARU concluded that the television commercial and Website promotional video did not comply with its Guidelines on safety by depicting children riding scooters on a road in addition to showing children riding the scooters without the recommended elbow and knee pads in the promotional video on the Website.  

Finally, CARU determined that the Website did not neutrally age screen for the “Pulse Team” sign-up.  CARU recommended that the Website age screen in a neutral manner by asking for age or birth date and either notify a parent and provide the opportunity to opt-out of the collection or prevent children under 13 from signing up for the promotional emails. 

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that while it does not “necessarily agree with CARU’s conclusions,” it would no longer air the commercial or promotional video at issue. The company also agreed to modify its Website to comply with CARU’s decision.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Problem Pregnancy Center to the MA Attorney General and Social Platforms for Review

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) referred advertising claims made by Problem Pregnancy, a crisis pregnancy center, to the Massachusetts Attorney General and social media platforms after the company failed to respond to NAD's inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Compostability Claims for HoldOn Bags Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that HoldOn Bags has a reasonable basis to claim that its trash bags break down in compost environments, but recommended other claims be discontinued. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge Aroeve Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for HEPA Air Purifiers

New York, NY – May 15, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge brought by competitor Vesync Corporation, Antadi LLC d/b/a Aroeve Direct voluntarily discontinued certain claims for its HEPA air purifiers.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends pawTree Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – May 9, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that pawTree, LLC discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and LinkedIn.  

Read the Decision Summary