CARU Recommends Reebok Discontinue Certain Claims for ZigTech Sneakers

New York, NY – June  7, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Reebok discontinue claims made in print advertising that might suggest Zigtech sneakers help children perform better in sports.

Print advertising for the Zigtech sneaker came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring practices. 

 The shoe, constructed with a zig-zag shaped sole, was prominently featured in the center of the advertisement at issue, along with a rendering of a child jumping to catch a football. 

 The text at the bottom of the advertisement stated: “Now for kids too.  Try the shoe with the energy boost.  Its unique zigzag shaped sole propels you forward with every step.” 

Upon its initial review, CARU questioned whether the advertisement could mislead children about the benefits of wearing the shoe or about the shoe’s performance or characteristics.

 In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser provided evidence related to the energy efficiency of the shoe’s design and argued that the advertising claims at issue could be understood, even by children, as an energy-efficiency message.

 CARU found, however, that children could believe, upon seeing the advertisement, that the shoe would help them perform better in sports, a message that was not supported by the advertiser’s evidence. CARU concluded that the advertising at issue could give rise to interpretations beyond those intended by the advertiser or supported by the advertiser’s evidence. CARU recommended the advertiser discontinue the claims at issue.

 Reebok, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company supports “CARU’s efforts to promote self-regulation.  Although it believes that the claims adequately reflect the underlying research that substantiates the energy return technology inherent in Zigtech sneakers, Reebok agrees to take CARU’s determination about the possible takeaway by children of a broader message into account in future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary