CARU Recommends Reebok Discontinue Certain Claims for ZigTech Sneakers

New York, NY – June  7, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Reebok discontinue claims made in print advertising that might suggest Zigtech sneakers help children perform better in sports.

Print advertising for the Zigtech sneaker came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring practices. 

 The shoe, constructed with a zig-zag shaped sole, was prominently featured in the center of the advertisement at issue, along with a rendering of a child jumping to catch a football. 

 The text at the bottom of the advertisement stated: “Now for kids too.  Try the shoe with the energy boost.  Its unique zigzag shaped sole propels you forward with every step.” 

Upon its initial review, CARU questioned whether the advertisement could mislead children about the benefits of wearing the shoe or about the shoe’s performance or characteristics.

 In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser provided evidence related to the energy efficiency of the shoe’s design and argued that the advertising claims at issue could be understood, even by children, as an energy-efficiency message.

 CARU found, however, that children could believe, upon seeing the advertisement, that the shoe would help them perform better in sports, a message that was not supported by the advertiser’s evidence. CARU concluded that the advertising at issue could give rise to interpretations beyond those intended by the advertiser or supported by the advertiser’s evidence. CARU recommended the advertiser discontinue the claims at issue.

 Reebok, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company supports “CARU’s efforts to promote self-regulation.  Although it believes that the claims adequately reflect the underlying research that substantiates the energy return technology inherent in Zigtech sneakers, Reebok agrees to take CARU’s determination about the possible takeaway by children of a broader message into account in future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary