CARU Recommends Rovio Modify Privacy Policy to Better Disclose Actual Practices, Company Said It Will Do So

New York, NY –  March 2, 2016  – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that Rovio, developer of The Star Wars Angry Birds App I and II and Angry Birds Rio App, modify its privacy policy to better disclose the company’s actual privacy practices. The company said it will do so.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU monitors websites and web services for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on Online Privacy Protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Upon its initial review, the privacy policy for the apps referenced a “Tell a Friend” feature and stated the following:

“1. How We Collect Your Data

Likely situations when you make personal data available to Rovio include, but are not limited to… (vi) using “Tell a Friend…”

Friends

If you choose to use Rovio’s “Tell a Friend” or a similar service about Rovio Services or order a gift certificate for your friend, Rovio may store your friend’s name and contact details that you provide to Rovio. [Emphasis added]The advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU through a consumer complaint.”
In response to CARU’s inquiry, Rovio immediately informed CARU that it did not actually operate a “Tell a Friend” feature in any jurisdiction, and was also not planning to operate any such feature in the U.S. prospectively.  Rovio stated that in the event that such a feature were made available in the U.S., Rovio would be sure to place it behind a COPPA compliant age screen.

CARU noted its appreciation for the company’s response.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary