CARU Recommends Telebrands Add Audio Disclosure to ‘Wow Cup’ Advertising

New York, NY – July 17, 2014 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that that Telebrands, Inc. modify advertising for the company’s “Wow Cup” to better disclose the full cost of the product. The company has agreed to do so.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU monitors advertising to children in all media. CARU also examines websites and apps for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising – which includes guidelines on online privacy protection – as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).

Television advertising for the patented non-spill cup came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s ongoing monitoring of advertising directed to children. The advertising at issue aired on Cartoon Network during the program “Codename: Kids.”

The advertising showed Wow Cups manipulated in ways that would cause liquid to spill from standard cups or glasses. The commercial featured a shot of Wow Cups held over a computer without spilling, along with the cost of a single cup displayed in a large font: “$10.”

A small written disclosure stated: “$5.99 S&H and $6.99 Separate Fee.”

The final voiceover of the commercial stated “Must be 18 years or older to order.” The voiceover did not mention the additional fees.

CARU questioned whether the commercial adequately informed children of the price of the Wow Cup. Following its review, CARU recommended that Telebrands add an audio disclosure that clearly states the price, including all additional fees.

Telebrands, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “believes that the terms of the offer as expressed in the commercial are clear enough to be fully comprehended by anyone who would be purchasing the product. As the decision notes, a purchaser must be 18 years of age or older to order. Additionally, they presumably, have access to a credit card, so the audience for the pricing terms is not an unsophisticated one. That said, out of regard for the self-regulatory process, Telebrands agrees to add the audio disclosure recommended by CARU.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary