CARU Recommends Topps Modify Website To Clearly Disclose Advertising, Company Does So

New York, NY – March 30, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Topps Company Inc., modify the Ring Pops section of its Website to clearly disclose that games available to children on the site are advertising.

The Website, www.Topps.com/candy, came to the attention of CARU – the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum – through CARU’s routine monitoring of Websites and advertising directed to children.

Upon CARU’s initial review, the Ring Pops page of the Website featured five interactive games, two of which integrate animated Ring Pops into the activity of the game.

CARU was concerned that children would not understand that the games on the Website promote the sale of Ring Pops and therefore should be clearly denoted as advertising under the CARU Guidelines.  

In response to CARU’s inquiry, the company asserted that it had developed an age-appropriate written disclosure, which states “HEY KIDS THIS IS ADVERTISING.” which has been added to each page where a game appears on its Website.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that “Topps accepts CARU’s decision in its entirety.  Topps shares CARU’s goals of ensuring that when it integrates advertising into its websites’ games and activities, it makes it clear and understandable to the intended audience that such content is advertising.  All recommended modifications to the websites are in place at the time of this decision.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary