CARU RECOMMENDS ZURU MODIFY BROADCAST ADVERTISING FOR SHNOOKS DOLLS; COMPANY DOES SO

New York, NY – March 6, 2012 –The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Zuru modify broadcast advertising for the company’s “Shnooks” dolls to better communicate the toys’ capabilities.

Advertising for the products came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through its routine monitoring practices.   The commercial aired during children’s programming.

The commercial depicts two children playing with six soft “Shnooks” dolls. Throughout the commercial, there are shots of the dolls blushing, blinking and smiling. In the closing shot, the dolls’ hair, initially flat, “pops” into dramatic volume.

CARU was concerned that children viewing the advertising might believe that the dolls blink, blush and smile, when they do not do so.

When reviewing advertising directed to children, CARU is sensitive to children’s susceptibilities and vulnerabilities. Further, CARU looks at an advertisement as a whole to determine what messages are conveyed.  Where no consumer perception evidence is supplied, CARU routinely steps into the shoes of the child consumer and uses its experienced judgment to determine the reasonable messages conveyed.

In this case, because no consumer studies were submitted, CARU used its experienced judgment to determine what messages a child could take away from the advertising

Zuru recognizes CARU’s concerns with the referenced television commercial.

In response to CARU’s inquiry,  Zuru said that it has already taken action by making revisions to the commercial to address CARU’s concerns.

“We will not use the earlier version of this television commercial again in the United States.  Zuru has always fully respected and supported CARU’s mission, Core Principles and Guidelines and will continue to follow these when developing our advertising in the future,” the company said.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary