CARU Refers Advertising for Dynacraft Cyco Cycle to FTC, CPSC After Advertiser Fails to Respond to CARU Inquiry
New York – July 25, 2011 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus referred advertising for Dynacraft’s Cyco Cycle to the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety Commission after the advertiser failed to respond a CARU inquiry.
Broadcast advertising for the Cyco Cycle came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring practices. The advertising at issue aired during children’s programming.
The advertising featured six adolescents performing stunts on Cyco Cycles – one-wheescents on Cyco Cycles –children’me to the attention of CARU, the children’ following the advertisled vehicles that do not have brakes or handlebars. The young people are depicted riding the cycles on a wet, slippery floor, doing stunts on stairways and with two riders on a single cycle.
The front page of the Owner’s Manual explicitly states, “FOR AGES THIRTEEN AND UP.”
The manual goes on to state, “A SPECIAL NOTE FOR PARENTS This product is easy to tip over and should not be used by minors that are under the recommended size and no one twelve or under. Uses such as aggressive riding, downhill riding, jumping, tricks, stunting and other extreme uses are not recommended and if you allow minor to do such things with this CYCO CYCLE you must assume sold responsibility for any harm that may result.”
Following its initial review, CARU questioned whether it was appropriate to advertise the product to children aged 12 and under.
Because the advertiser elected not to participate in the CARU process, CARU has referred the matter to the FTC and CPSC for further review.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...