CARU Refers Advertising From TRIOPS, INC. To FTC For Review

New York, NY – August 6,  2008 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has referred advertising for the Triassic Triops kit, marketed by Triops, Inc., to the Federal Trade Commission.  Advertising for the Triops Kit came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s ongoing monitoring. 

Triassic Triops are described as shrimp-like creatures dating back to the Triassic period.  Product packaging includes the statements “Triassic Triops are actual prehistoric creatures which are identical to their prehistoric kin.  They survived the centuries during interrupted states of suspended animation or ‘diapause.’  This state of suspended animation enables the Triops to survive seasonal drought.  Triassic Triops permits you to grow and study the behavior of an amazing creature that hasn’t changed in a million years.”

The claim, “Just add water” appears on three sides of the product’s package.

The instruction booklet, which is available only after the product is purchased and opened, specifies that distilled or spring water must be used to rinse and fill the tank.  Additionally, a continuous light source must be used to keep the tank at a constant 74-84 degree temperature.  These additional requirements do not appear on the product’s packaging.

CARU questioned whether the product’s packaging complies with its Guidelines on material disclosures and disclaimers. Specifically, CARU questioned whether the necessity for distilled (or spring) water and a constant light source (kept at a specific temperature) were material information that should be conspicuously disclosed on the product’s package, in light of the claims made.

The advertiser failed to provide a substantive response to CARU’s inquiry. CARU, pursuant to its policies and procedures, has referred the matter to the Federal Trade Commission.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary