CARU Refers Game Publisher UCool to FTC After Company Declines to Participate in CARU Process

New York, NY –  Sept. 12, 2017  – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has referred video game publisher UCool to the Federal Trade Commission after the company failed to respond to CARU’s inquiry concerning UCool’s “Heroes Arena” mobile application.

CARU, an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation, monitors websites and apps for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on privacy protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. CARU is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

The Heroes Arena app came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring practices.

Heroes Arena is a virtual world in which multiple players choose avatar heroes to fight and overcome monsters and ultimately the “enemy’s generator.”  The game enables multiple mobile players to unite against a common in-game enemy.

According to the Apple App Store, Heroes Arena is rated 12+ for “Infrequent mild sexual content and nudity” and “Infrequent/Mild Cartoon or Fantasy Violence.”

The App Store included the following information from the developer: “NOTICE: Under our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, you must be at least 13 years of age to play or download Heroes Arena.”

CARU was concerned that advertising an app with a 12+ rating that one must be at least 13 to play during children’s programming violated CARU’s guidelines.

UCool declined to participate in the self-regulatory process and did not file a substantive written response to either CARU’s original inquiry letter or CARU’s 15-day follow-up letter.

In light of the operator’s decision against participation, CARU has referred this matter to the Federal Trade Commission for further review.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary