CARU Refers Genesis Toys, Maker of Cayla ‘Connected’ Doll, to FTC After Company Fails to Respond to Privacy Inquiry

New York, NY – July 12, 2017  – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has referred Genesis Toys, the maker of “My Friend Cayla Party Time” doll and the operator of an accompanying  app and website, to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for further review, after the company failed to provide a substantive response to CARU initial privacy inquiry.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. CARU monitors websites and apps for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on privacy protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. CARU is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU, as part of its initial privacy review, asked Genesis Toys:

  • Whether the app collects personally identifiable information in the form of name, address, geolocation, persistent identifiers and audio recordings of a child’s voice without first giving notice to parents of its actions or obtaining verifiable parental consent as required by COPPA and the Guidelines.
  • Whether the Privacy Policy contains a complete description of what information the operator collects from children, how it uses that information and how that information may be disclosed.
  • Whether Genesis provides information about third parties that collect and use children’s voice recordings.
  • Whether the Privacy Policy contains adequate contact information.
  • Whether the Privacy Policy provides procedures for a parent to review, have the child’s personal information deleted or for parents to refuse to permit further collection or use of such personal information.
  • Whether Genesis provides a prominent link to a Privacy Policy on the homepage of its website or anywhere within its app.
  • Whether the operator provides direct notice to parents of its information practices, including direct notice of any material changes to those practices.
  • Whether Genesis employs reasonable security measures, such as authentication within the app, to ensure there is no unauthorized use of the doll.
  • Whether Genesis follows COPPA’s deletion and data retention requirements.
  • Whether Genesis’ packaging for the doll is deceptive because it does not explain to parents that children’s personal information can be collected and represents that the doll is equipped with “Kid Safe Internet.”

The company failed to file a substantive written response to either CARU’s original inquiry letter or CARU’s 15-day follow-up letter.

Given the advertiser’s decision against participation in the self-regulatory process, CARU has referred the advertising at issue to the FTC for review, pursuant to NAD/CARU Procedures.

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary