CARU Refers Haribo Advertising to FTC for Further Review

New York, NY – May 27,  2010 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has referred broadcast advertising for Haribo of America, Inc.’s Gold-Bears Gummy Candy to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for further review.

 CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, recommended in 2010 that the advertiser modify broadcast advertising for the product to avoid the depiction of over-consumption. The advertiser agreed “to take CARU’s concerns into account in future advertising.”

In March 2011, CARU reviewed a commercial for Gold-Bears which was substantially the same as the commercial reviewed in 2010.

In the advertising at issue, several children in business attire are seated around a conference-room table, discussing the product. The table holds four large bowls of candy and each child is eating from a bag of Gold-Bears that contains 3.5 servings.

CARU’s guidelines, which offer guidance to advertisers on food marketing to children, state in part that the amount of product featured “should not be excessive or more than would be reasonable to acquire, use or consume by a person in the situation depicted.  For example, if an advertisement depicts food being consumed by a person in the advertisement, or suggests that food will be consumed, the quantity of food shown should not exceed the labeled serving size on the Nutrition Facts panel … .”

 In response to CARU’s compliance inquiry, the advertiser responded that it did not believe that the referenced commercial encouraged excessive consumption of Gold-Bears.  The advertiser noted that the commercial at issue had not been edited.

 CARU was disappointed the Advertiser did not address CARU’s concerns in its advertising.  Pursuant to CARU’s procedures, the advertising has been referred to the FTC for further review.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary